Glaive, force or ice ?

[Snazzi]

I would like to know which you guys would prefer; force or ice ? I know the pros of both builds ..

Force
- good in pvp
- weak against euros, half of them have cleric sub
- no snow shield
- max damage

Ice
- great for tanking
- alright at pvp
- weaker than force (damage wise)
- ice imbue

Just wanna know your thoughts.

[larrylhm]

personally my opinion is more leaning towards Force

as you mentioned, half the euros have cleric as subclass. so which means the other half doesnt, and you can add in chinese class.

imagine if 100% is Euro, and 100% is chinese, total will be 200%.

50% are Euro Cleric Subs
meaning the other 150% are Euro Non cleric sub + Chinese

you'll still have the advantage. thats provided its really 50%

go for force. it had been deemed useless for far too long

[MeNii]

force is not weak against holyspell , is same like glavier-cold and glavier-light , have same skills, maybe he cant debuff.
but as i know glavier/cold/light cant debuff too [1debuff , dull]
so i dont see in this a "weak".

maybe he dont have snow and high defence, but he is nice against chinese and against euro if you have good set.

my glavier-force had 2050 phy def and 520parry ratio, i know alot light and cold 100 masterry players with less def/pr than what i had.

[Alkali]

voted for force, it fits glaivers nicely with all the debuffs and nice dmg, and if you want snow, go for 100 heuksal, 100 force, 80fire and 20 cold, the mag def and like ~2% phy dmg wont affect the dmg by much, the snow shield is more worth it.