NH Primary

Anything else. Post a funny site or tell us about yourself. Discuss current events or whatever else you want. Post off topic threads here.
User avatar
dom
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9962
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:46 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: västkustskt

Post by dom »

Jstar1 wrote:you do know that this is merely a regional war? America doesn't have as many troops fighting either, nor are there any powerful enemy soldiers like nazi germany. All we have are occasional car bombs that kill soldiers in hummers, not huge firefight battles like stalingrad or normandy



In late 2003, the Department of Defense plan was to reduce the number of American troops in Iraq to 105,000 by May 2004.

However, in November 2006, there were approximately 140,000 troops there. We no longer know what the breakdown is between active and reserve forces (including National Guard). The last time those data were available, there were 90,000 active forces and 60,000 reserve.


Not many soldiers at all.
Image

User avatar
Nuklear
Veteran Member
Posts: 3272
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:46 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: off topic

Post by Nuklear »

redneck wrote:..Its not a big deal...

I absolutely agree. As long is it isn't a lot of Americans dead it's ok with me. I can't stand those pussies with all the head injuries either. They should be glad they're not dead. So ungrateful.

Also, Hillary is maintaining her lead.
Image
No government?!?! Oh, noes! Total chaos! Or would it be? http://freekeene.com/free-audiobook/

User avatar
Jstar1
Senior Member
Posts: 4757
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:30 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by Jstar1 »

dom wrote:
Jstar1 wrote:you do know that this is merely a regional war? America doesn't have as many troops fighting either, nor are there any powerful enemy soldiers like nazi germany. All we have are occasional car bombs that kill soldiers in hummers, not huge firefight battles like stalingrad or normandy



In late 2003, the Department of Defense plan was to reduce the number of American troops in Iraq to 105,000 by May 2004.

However, in November 2006, there were approximately 140,000 troops there. We no longer know what the breakdown is between active and reserve forces (including National Guard). The last time those data were available, there were 90,000 active forces and 60,000 reserve.


Not many soldiers at all.


We don't have many FIGHTING soldiers. FIGHTING soldiers. Many are just there for peacekeeping and patrolling neighborhoods. Iraq is a pretty large country you know.

And its common sense to know that since there aren't anything about massive gunbattles with terrorists, there aren't large death tolls.
Image

redneck
Advanced Member
Posts: 2342
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:15 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by redneck »

Nuklear wrote:
redneck wrote:..Its not a big deal...

I absolutely agree. As long is it isn't a lot of Americans dead it's ok with me. I can't stand those pussies with all the head injuries either. They should be glad they're not dead. So ungrateful.

Also, Hillary is maintaining her lead.


Lol they lose a little blood and get a purple heart...
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>

redneck
Advanced Member
Posts: 2342
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:15 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by redneck »

Jstar1 wrote:
dom wrote:
Jstar1 wrote:you do know that this is merely a regional war? America doesn't have as many troops fighting either, nor are there any powerful enemy soldiers like nazi germany. All we have are occasional car bombs that kill soldiers in hummers, not huge firefight battles like stalingrad or normandy



In late 2003, the Department of Defense plan was to reduce the number of American troops in Iraq to 105,000 by May 2004.

However, in November 2006, there were approximately 140,000 troops there. We no longer know what the breakdown is between active and reserve forces (including National Guard). The last time those data were available, there were 90,000 active forces and 60,000 reserve.


Not many soldiers at all.


We don't have many FIGHTING soldiers. FIGHTING soldiers. Many are just there for peacekeeping and patrolling neighborhoods. Iraq is a pretty large country you know.

And its common sense to know that since there aren't anything about massive gunbattles with terrorists, there aren't large death tolls.


Should have sent as many troops as possible to end it within a year or two...We had the same problem with Vientnam...Not enough troops sent in to get the job done
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>

User avatar
Jstar1
Senior Member
Posts: 4757
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:30 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by Jstar1 »

redneck wrote:
Nuklear wrote:
redneck wrote:..Its not a big deal...

I absolutely agree. As long is it isn't a lot of Americans dead it's ok with me. I can't stand those pussies with all the head injuries either. They should be glad they're not dead. So ungrateful.

Also, Hillary is maintaining her lead.


Lol they lose a little blood and get a purple heart...


you guys are cruel. Being a soldier is very hard, emotional, and tough. You don't have to be a WWII veteran to have psycological pain from seeing dead bodies or friends killed in battle.

maybe you should be a soldier in iraq and I guarentee you will be scared shitless when your driving through a street in iraq when you never know when theres a car bomb or rpg headed your way. And maybe when you "lose a little blood" you'll be grateful that theres medics and a clean hospital for you to stay until your better. And you'll be thankful when general petreus comes and shakes your hand and tells you that you make a difference here.

at least the US army gives you a purple heart for getting hurt. And when you mean by "losing a little blood" are you telling me about a scratch you got when you tripped on your foot walking on a street in iraq? A little "scratch" can be a leg shot or arm shot and thats what usually is the case for getting a purple heart. Seriously be a little more understanding
Image

User avatar
Jstar1
Senior Member
Posts: 4757
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:30 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by Jstar1 »

redneck wrote:
Jstar1 wrote:
dom wrote:
Jstar1 wrote:you do know that this is merely a regional war? America doesn't have as many troops fighting either, nor are there any powerful enemy soldiers like nazi germany. All we have are occasional car bombs that kill soldiers in hummers, not huge firefight battles like stalingrad or normandy



In late 2003, the Department of Defense plan was to reduce the number of American troops in Iraq to 105,000 by May 2004.

However, in November 2006, there were approximately 140,000 troops there. We no longer know what the breakdown is between active and reserve forces (including National Guard). The last time those data were available, there were 90,000 active forces and 60,000 reserve.


Not many soldiers at all.


We don't have many FIGHTING soldiers. FIGHTING soldiers. Many are just there for peacekeeping and patrolling neighborhoods. Iraq is a pretty large country you know.

And its common sense to know that since there aren't anything about massive gunbattles with terrorists, there aren't large death tolls.


Should have sent as many troops as possible to end it within a year or two...We had the same problem with Vientnam...Not enough troops sent in to get the job done


no 1 million soldiers cant make a difference. They have the support of the people, the terrorists, and they have a continues supply of young arabs you are brainwashed into thinking americas stupid and join terrorists to fight. They never run out of car bombs and soon america will be too exhausted and annoyed to fight, just like vietnam
Image

redneck
Advanced Member
Posts: 2342
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:15 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by redneck »

Jstar1 wrote:
redneck wrote:
Nuklear wrote:
redneck wrote:..Its not a big deal...

I absolutely agree. As long is it isn't a lot of Americans dead it's ok with me. I can't stand those pussies with all the head injuries either. They should be glad they're not dead. So ungrateful.

Also, Hillary is maintaining her lead.


Lol they lose a little blood and get a purple heart...


you guys are cruel. Being a soldier is very hard, emotional, and tough. You don't have to be a WWII veteran to have psycological pain from seeing dead bodies or friends killed in battle.

maybe you should be a soldier in iraq and I guarentee you will be scared shitless when your driving through a street in iraq when you never know when theres a car bomb or rpg headed your way. And maybe when you "lose a little blood" you'll be grateful that theres medics and a clean hospital for you to stay until your better. And you'll be thankful when general petreus comes and shakes your hand and tells you that you make a difference here.

at least the US army gives you a purple heart for getting hurt. And when you mean by "losing a little blood" are you telling me about a scratch you got when you tripped on your foot walking on a street in iraq? A little "scratch" can be a leg shot or arm shot and thats what usually is the case for getting a purple heart. Seriously be a little more understanding


Hmm where are those videos that reise posted.. The soldiers running over the cab with a tank. emotional eh?

You talk like you know from experience?

Thought the army took your emotions away?
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>

User avatar
Nuklear
Veteran Member
Posts: 3272
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:46 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: off topic

Post by Nuklear »

redneck wrote:
Nuklear wrote:
redneck wrote:..Its not a big deal...

I absolutely agree. As long is it isn't a lot of Americans dead it's ok with me. I can't stand those pussies with all the head injuries either. They should be glad they're not dead. So ungrateful.

Also, Hillary is maintaining her lead.


Lol they lose a little blood and get a purple heart...

You're so sick. You didn't even notice my sarcasm.

Looks like Hillary is going to take it unless Obama gets most of the college voters.
Image
No government?!?! Oh, noes! Total chaos! Or would it be? http://freekeene.com/free-audiobook/

User avatar
Jstar1
Senior Member
Posts: 4757
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:30 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by Jstar1 »

redneck wrote:
Jstar1 wrote:
redneck wrote:
Nuklear wrote:
redneck wrote:..Its not a big deal...

I absolutely agree. As long is it isn't a lot of Americans dead it's ok with me. I can't stand those pussies with all the head injuries either. They should be glad they're not dead. So ungrateful.

Also, Hillary is maintaining her lead.


Lol they lose a little blood and get a purple heart...


you guys are cruel. Being a soldier is very hard, emotional, and tough. You don't have to be a WWII veteran to have psycological pain from seeing dead bodies or friends killed in battle.

maybe you should be a soldier in iraq and I guarentee you will be scared shitless when your driving through a street in iraq when you never know when theres a car bomb or rpg headed your way. And maybe when you "lose a little blood" you'll be grateful that theres medics and a clean hospital for you to stay until your better. And you'll be thankful when general petreus comes and shakes your hand and tells you that you make a difference here.

at least the US army gives you a purple heart for getting hurt. And when you mean by "losing a little blood" are you telling me about a scratch you got when you tripped on your foot walking on a street in iraq? A little "scratch" can be a leg shot or arm shot and thats what usually is the case for getting a purple heart. Seriously be a little more understanding


Hmm where are those videos that reise posted.. The soldiers running over the cab with a tank. emotional eh?

You talk like you know from experience?

Thought the army took your emotions away?


I'm stating the obvious. Its not hard to imagine yourself as a marine. If some kid like you comes up to one of them and tells them that they are baby-killers, how would you feel if you did nothing wrong but try to do what is right?

@nucklear

I just know that if hilary wins NH, your gonna come and say ZOMG HILARY PWNZ0RD YOU ALL!!1!1!11

its one primary or caucus, theres a lot more ahead..
Image

User avatar
Nuklear
Veteran Member
Posts: 3272
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:46 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: off topic

Post by Nuklear »

Jstar1 wrote:@nucklear

I just know that if hilary wins NH, your gonna come and say ZOMG HILARY PWNZ0RD YOU ALL!!1!1!11

its one primary or caucus, theres a lot more ahead..

See me whoring Ron Paul? Yea? I don't care if Hillary wins, I care if Obama loses. I only care because it'll be ironic. All polls had Obama>Hillary and, what seemed like a week, the MSM were just constantly sucking Obama's dick over that and his win in Iowa.
Just Deserts if you will.

Oh, and stop misspelling my username please.
Image
No government?!?! Oh, noes! Total chaos! Or would it be? http://freekeene.com/free-audiobook/

User avatar
Jstar1
Senior Member
Posts: 4757
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:30 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by Jstar1 »

Nuklear wrote:
Jstar1 wrote:@nucklear

I just know that if hilary wins NH, your gonna come and say ZOMG HILARY PWNZ0RD YOU ALL!!1!1!11

its one primary or caucus, theres a lot more ahead..

See me whoring Ron Paul? Yea? I don't care if Hillary wins, I care if Obama loses. I only care because it'll be ironic. All polls had Obama>Hillary and, what seemed like a week, the MSM were just constantly sucking Obama's dick over that and his win in Iowa.
Just Deserts if you will.

Oh, and stop misspelling my username please.


yeah well early on, a lot of people were saying hillary was the juggarnaut among the dems, where is she now? shes not sweeping the polls in any place. Obama and edwards have caught up
Image

User avatar
Nuklear
Veteran Member
Posts: 3272
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:46 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: off topic

Post by Nuklear »

No, just Obama. Also, the early showing was of national polls where most people have heard of Clinton but most likely not Obama. Most of it was just MSM hype per usual.
Image
No government?!?! Oh, noes! Total chaos! Or would it be? http://freekeene.com/free-audiobook/

User avatar
Jstar1
Senior Member
Posts: 4757
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:30 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by Jstar1 »

Nuklear wrote:No, just Obama. Also, the early showing was of national polls where most people have heard of Clinton but most likely not Obama. Most of it was just MSM hype per usual.


whats MSM?

and its a little obvious that we all know hilary and not the other candidates. She was the first lady before so of course people would recognize her
Image

User avatar
Nuklear
Veteran Member
Posts: 3272
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:46 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: off topic

Post by Nuklear »

Main Stream Media.
ABC
CBS
NBC
FOX
CNN
and their affiliates.

Hillary has a 6k lead. Looks about official.
Image
No government?!?! Oh, noes! Total chaos! Or would it be? http://freekeene.com/free-audiobook/

User avatar
Nuklear
Veteran Member
Posts: 3272
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:46 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: off topic

Post by Nuklear »

Hilliary just won. :D
Image
No government?!?! Oh, noes! Total chaos! Or would it be? http://freekeene.com/free-audiobook/

User avatar
Jstar1
Senior Member
Posts: 4757
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:30 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by Jstar1 »

heres a cookie enjoy yourself


Image
Image

User avatar
Nuklear
Veteran Member
Posts: 3272
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:46 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: off topic

Post by Nuklear »

You don't get it, do you? >_>
Image
No government?!?! Oh, noes! Total chaos! Or would it be? http://freekeene.com/free-audiobook/

User avatar
Jstar1
Senior Member
Posts: 4757
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:30 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Off Topic

Post by Jstar1 »

Nuklear wrote:You don't get it, do you? >_>


get what :P
Image

User avatar
Aiyas
Loyal Member
Posts: 1679
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:31 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: JENGAAAA!!!!

Post by Aiyas »

Nuklear wrote:Hilliary just won. :D


For what it's worth. :P

*sigh* Is this the best the Democrats could come up with?

User avatar
shoto
Frequent Member
Posts: 1459
Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 10:54 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Alps
Contact:

Post by shoto »

lots of older and female voters went for hillary (45%)

and she will/has won
Image

Mysterious Death Desert
Mysterious desert that causes mysterious deaths

User avatar
Caras
Frequent Member
Posts: 1337
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:15 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Place to place.

Post by Caras »

Nuklear wrote:Hilliary just won. :D


Oh my god :banghead:

Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Lounge”