The "Nude" patch.
Stallowned wrote:Bare chested I guess is cool, but wanting a nude patch to see their peckers and lips and melons, please reach down and unplug your computer, step away, lock yourself in a room and just sit for about 30 minutes and think of how much of a failure you are. Then dissapear off the face of the earth
o.O lol read wat u posted "peckers lips melons"
dude..... i'am wordless.
btw the patch only makes that u can see men barechest and have like 6 packs they do wear undies as for women they're pretty much all wearing pj's so its not rly a nude patch.
I WANT IT BACK I WANT B A BARE CHESTED SHAOLINMONK & TANKING 15 NOOBS AT A TIME(TO LVL 20S IM A PURE STR lol)[/b]
The only sickness here is the people who think nude automatically equals porn, and that it's some sort of sick and terrible thing to see drawings of unclothed bodies.
Isn't nature just art? Is art not beautiful? Is computer generated imagery not also art? Then where exactly do you draw such vindication from? What closet society has raised you to be so poor, so sheltered from the realities of the world that you shy from mere depictions - or even the slightest mention of - something we all have, and all were born with?
*Shakes her head sadly*
I truely pity you. You miss the entire point of things like this in your massively naive assumption that all anybody wants out of nudity is to gain sexual pleasure from it. How about holding your poison tongues for a second longer and considering a healther point of view, before branding everyone as predators of the flesh or "sick" and "perverted"? It is you who needs to sit in a room, alone, and consider what upbringing has caused you to become so offended by beauty, and so disgusted by those who actually appreciate it.
If I ever figured out how to make such a patch, I would release it for everyone to enjoy. Why not? I'm sure most people DO only want it for sexual gratification, but then, it is nothing we can't see in the real world anyway. So what really is the problem with that, if it were to come with an age requirement?
On the other hand, there are those of us who would want it for the beauty of the body, and that is perfectly fine too. Your opinions are as incredible as they are heartbreaking. It is people like you who make the rest of us lose a little bit of our faith in humanity every time you come up with such garbage and try to force it like gospel upon everybody else.
In summary, shove your accusatory faux indignation back up your butts, where I'm sure you keep all such ridiculous opinions.
^ I love that line, and I'm going to keep it for future use. xD
Isn't nature just art? Is art not beautiful? Is computer generated imagery not also art? Then where exactly do you draw such vindication from? What closet society has raised you to be so poor, so sheltered from the realities of the world that you shy from mere depictions - or even the slightest mention of - something we all have, and all were born with?
*Shakes her head sadly*
I truely pity you. You miss the entire point of things like this in your massively naive assumption that all anybody wants out of nudity is to gain sexual pleasure from it. How about holding your poison tongues for a second longer and considering a healther point of view, before branding everyone as predators of the flesh or "sick" and "perverted"? It is you who needs to sit in a room, alone, and consider what upbringing has caused you to become so offended by beauty, and so disgusted by those who actually appreciate it.
If I ever figured out how to make such a patch, I would release it for everyone to enjoy. Why not? I'm sure most people DO only want it for sexual gratification, but then, it is nothing we can't see in the real world anyway. So what really is the problem with that, if it were to come with an age requirement?
On the other hand, there are those of us who would want it for the beauty of the body, and that is perfectly fine too. Your opinions are as incredible as they are heartbreaking. It is people like you who make the rest of us lose a little bit of our faith in humanity every time you come up with such garbage and try to force it like gospel upon everybody else.
In summary, shove your accusatory faux indignation back up your butts, where I'm sure you keep all such ridiculous opinions.
^ I love that line, and I'm going to keep it for future use. xD
I actually did that thing in Mixmax's Sig!
- BlueFeather
- Active Member
- Posts: 609
- Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 7:42 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: xian
- SilentKnight
- Regular Member
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 4:59 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Xian
- Contact:
I'm sure it's not as bad as undressing Barbie dolls (or Ken dolls if they swing that way).
There isn't much else to censor with all these people calling everything gay or ****** and telling them to suck their **** and stuff.
This game is bloody, what will it teach them about killing endlessly? And killing anyone that pisses them off? And what would killing tigers teach them also?
There isn't much else to censor with all these people calling everything gay or ****** and telling them to suck their **** and stuff.
This game is bloody, what will it teach them about killing endlessly? And killing anyone that pisses them off? And what would killing tigers teach them also?
- Bakemaster
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4732
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:06 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Babel
Moogie wrote:The only sickness here is the people who think nude automatically equals porn, and that it's some sort of sick and terrible thing to see drawings of unclothed bodies.
It doesn't need to be porn and it doesn't need to be sick or terrible to qualify as inappropriate. The fact remains that there is a strong general taboo against children + nudity in many cultures, yours and mine included (with obvious exceptions). It may be that this taboo is unnecessary or even ridiculous, but it would still be unethical not to respect a parent's right to enforce that taboo when dealing with their own children. And there are a lot of 10-15 year olds who've played SRO.
Personally, I believe that nudity can be artistic and not gratuitous, but I wouldn't want to introduce a child of mine to nudity via an MMORPG. The kid needs to understand to realize that he or she is looking at a nude person, and game models are not people.
LOL
- ShizKnight
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 3104
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:01 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: _______
Moogie wrote:The only sickness here is the people who think nude automatically equals porn, and that it's some sort of sick and terrible thing to see drawings of unclothed bodies.
Isn't nature just art? Is art not beautiful? Is computer generated imagery not also art? Then where exactly do you draw such vindication from? What closet society has raised you to be so poor, so sheltered from the realities of the world that you shy from mere depictions - or even the slightest mention of - something we all have, and all were born with?
*Shakes her head sadly*
I truely pity you. You miss the entire point of things like this in your massively naive assumption that all anybody wants out of nudity is to gain sexual pleasure from it. How about holding your poison tongues for a second longer and considering a healther point of view, before branding everyone as predators of the flesh or "sick" and "perverted"? It is you who needs to sit in a room, alone, and consider what upbringing has caused you to become so offended by beauty, and so disgusted by those who actually appreciate it.
If I ever figured out how to make such a patch, I would release it for everyone to enjoy. Why not? I'm sure most people DO only want it for sexual gratification, but then, it is nothing we can't see in the real world anyway. So what really is the problem with that, if it were to come with an age requirement?
On the other hand, there are those of us who would want it for the beauty of the body, and that is perfectly fine too. Your opinions are as incredible as they are heartbreaking. It is people like you who make the rest of us lose a little bit of our faith in humanity every time you come up with such garbage and try to force it like gospel upon everybody else.
In summary, shove your accusatory faux indignation back up your butts, where I'm sure you keep all such ridiculous opinions.
^ I love that line, and I'm going to keep it for future use. xD
not surprising someone with a siggy like urs post like this lol
- ShizKnight
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 3104
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:01 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: _______
-
nightbloom
- Elite Member
- Posts: 5492
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:11 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
- Contact:
I kinda like JoyMax for respecting the culture into which they brought the game. Is it silly to think that seeing nudity is wrong? Maybe. But the majority rules and America is a pimarily Christian culture. I mean, on Xian I would much rather my son looked at the naked bodies of women with appreciation than Twiggy03 and ExDos' globals about having sex with eachother and any other man they can rope into it, but that is just a personal prefrence. America has a long history of condeming nudity and JoyMax merely made the game respect that. At least they did some research first....
<<banned from SRF for rules violations: being a constant problem. -SG>>
I shit on the nude patch...is it necessary ? And if u want a nude patch u can make it urself anyways...(Moogie's thread about reskining).
And afteru've made it u can just teach ppl how 2 make it with sum kind of tutorial and upload the shit. Joymax doesn't need 2 make it...make it urself if u wanna c sum1 naked posing in da game
And afteru've made it u can just teach ppl how 2 make it with sum kind of tutorial and upload the shit. Joymax doesn't need 2 make it...make it urself if u wanna c sum1 naked posing in da game
link 2 my sig
old sig
Quote: Life sux....but it's got hella good grafix
---For a completely new experience of music visit http://www.pandra.com
Quit SRO
old sig
Quote: Life sux....but it's got hella good grafix
---For a completely new experience of music visit http://www.pandra.com
Quit SRO
I totally agree with Bakemaster and nightbloom's opinions on children's exposure to 'inappropriate content' in games in modern societies. What I would enjoy seeing is an age-restricted patch, but I know that it would be all too easy for anyone with a brain to circumvent that measure by faking their date of birth (or whatever). In the end, I know it's not feasable, and I don't argue that it should be any other way.
My only beef is with the people who came in here yelling about how "sick" it is that people want to be able to unclothe their characters. That's one topic I will vehemently fight against any day. x]
XuChu: I was waiting for someone to point that out, lol.
Fortunately, the image in my sig is a photo of a real person. Still art, and still quite risqué, but I think we're mainly dealing with the issue of character nudity 'en masse' in games. Besides. I've seen shorter skirts just by walking down the street. :] But well spotted, you get a cookie. My sig is indeed not the best thing to come after such a post.
My only beef is with the people who came in here yelling about how "sick" it is that people want to be able to unclothe their characters. That's one topic I will vehemently fight against any day. x]
XuChu: I was waiting for someone to point that out, lol.
I actually did that thing in Mixmax's Sig!
Moogie wrote:XuChu: I was waiting for someone to point that out, lol.Fortunately, the image in my sig is a photo of a real person. Still art, and still quite risqué, but I think we're mainly dealing with the issue of character nudity 'en masse' in games. Besides. I've seen shorter skirts just by walking down the street. :] But well spotted, you get a cookie. My sig is indeed not the best thing to come after such a post.
oh thats a skirt of thought it was like a handbag or something
Someone hasn't read beyond the first post, then, or he would be removing his foot from his mouth as we speak. :]
Seriously, discussion on this is fun and a good idea. But at least read the thread first so you can say something worthwhile, and not make yourself look silly.
Seriously, discussion on this is fun and a good idea. But at least read the thread first so you can say something worthwhile, and not make yourself look silly.
I actually did that thing in Mixmax's Sig!
Moogie wrote:Someone hasn't read beyond the first post, then, or he would be removing his foot from his mouth as we speak. :]
Seriously, discussion on this is fun and a good idea. But at least read the thread first so you can say something worthwhile, and not make yourself look silly.
im just wondering moogie... y r u always flaming evry1?!?!
- [SD]Master_Wong
- Forum God
- Posts: 9509
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:02 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Plymouth, University
drey7000 wrote:Moogie wrote:Someone hasn't read beyond the first post, then, or he would be removing his foot from his mouth as we speak. :]
Seriously, discussion on this is fun and a good idea. But at least read the thread first so you can say something worthwhile, and not make yourself look silly.
im just wondering moogie... y r u always flaming evry1?!?!
Remind me.. who are you, again..? :]
I will speak my mind against anyone who shows themselves as shallow, singleminded, racist, sexist, or just plain -ist. Decent people, on the other hand, I treat with the utmost respect and friendliness, as they undoubtedly deserve it.
This means I am nice to about 90% of the people here. I only "flame" when there is reason to, and unless the person takes it upon themselves to become a forum-wide nuisance *cough-dop-cough*, I hold no grudges beyond the topic where the discussion originally took place.
And I am evil.
I actually did that thing in Mixmax's Sig!


