New sig (should I use it?)

Post by **dom** » Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:00 am

I didn't really do anything other than playing with lightning and burn/dodge. Here's a sample of what it looked like at about half way

and here's the original

InsertName · Post by **InsertName** » Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:11 am

perfect world? looks good

maybe a border

Post by **dom** » Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:00 am

InsertName wrote:perfect world? looks good maybe a border

There is one, I darkened it a bit though. Thanks for the comments - oh, and it's guildwars.

Cmon guys, anyone else?

cin · Post by **cin** » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:09 am

i like the colors a lot. has a pretty good depth as well.
i'd only work on the text if i were you, i mean it does
fit the tag at the moment, but perhaps you can play around
with it a bit more because its now static in the bottom
left, and doesn't really go with any flow in the sig :]

and perhaps you could like fancy it up a little bit, for
example, with glowy pentool lines going up from beneath
the character. this could also add up to the flow of the
sig, which is basically the only thing i'm really missing
here.

Hostage · Post by **Hostage** » Wed Sep 03, 2008 10:16 am

You usually have the most kick ass text I've ever seen in sigs but I'm not loving it to much here, that blur effect isn't helping much either.

Other then that I like it but remember to play around with the "intensity" and "exposer" settings next time you use "lighting effects" to make a light source because as of right now it seems to bright around his face.

Melez · Post by **Melez** » Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:23 pm

Great. The trees are used as a c4d. Great.
(And the Chaos Axe and Tormented Shield look kewl)

8.5/10 Very good.

cin · Post by **cin** » Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:32 pm

Melez wrote:Great. The trees are used as a c4d. Great.

dont get it O.o

a c4d is a render made by the program cinema4d which is
a 3d modelling program. idk how he could use trees like
that T_T

Post by **dom** » Wed Sep 03, 2008 2:59 pm

Thanks guys, I see what you're saying. I'll fix it.

Melez · Post by **Melez** » Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:25 pm

cin wrote:
Melez wrote:Great. The trees are used as a c4d. Great.

dont get it O.o

a c4d is a render made by the program cinema4d which is
a 3d modelling program. idk how he could use trees like
that T_T

Lal, from the lil' help i got for using PS I understood it as a "raw effect" in your sig. Didn't know the origin of it, or exactly what it means. Sorry, I still don't know/understand the terms, I'm a newb (noob).

I appologize again.

guess the humiliation level is high now :banghead:

cin · Post by **cin** » Wed Sep 03, 2008 4:58 pm

Melez wrote:guess the humiliation level is high now

lol no worries you just learned something new.

the program is called cinema4d. it's a 3d modelling program like
3d max. you can make nice renders with them that can be used in
a signature or artwork, to add flow/direction, depth, etc.

the program is a bitch to work with tho (imo). you can find some
c4d renders at http://www.planetrenders.net. search for c4d.

Melez · Post by **Melez** » Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:56 pm

cin wrote:
Melez wrote:guess the humiliation level is high now

lol no worries you just learned something new.

the program is called cinema4d. it's a 3d modelling program like
3d max. you can make nice renders with them that can be used in
a signature or artwork, to add flow/direction, depth, etc.

the program is a bitch to work with tho (imo). you can find some
c4d renders at http://www.planetrenders.net. search for c4d.

Thanks for the link. And for the big tip(s).

_Angels · Post by **_Angels** » Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:25 pm

nice job :O seriously=p i usually hate sigs that r made out of screenshots lol>.<
but this one..is really nice.. nice effects nice quality char image @_@
wuutwuut *thumbs up*

rek · Post by **rek** » Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:54 am

Nice work. Its hard working with screenies.

Tig3ress · Post by **Tig3ress** » Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:01 pm

**** DOM, WHITE DyE IS EXPENSIVE. YOUR MAKING ME FEEL BAD >.<

EDIT: EotN ftw :3

CrimsonNuker · Post by **CrimsonNuker** » Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:47 pm

Lol dom, you're in game graphics are so great that people think its c4d xD

Love · Post by **Love** » Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:06 pm

i dont like it to be honest, try adding some magic like effects coming off the shield maybe to make it look better couse honestly i dont think you have much to work with

Post by **dom** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:45 pm

Tig3ress wrote:**** DOM, WHITE DyE IS EXPENSIVE. YOUR MAKING ME FEEL BAD >.<

EDIT: EotN ftw :3

lulzies

so is black dye

Melez · Post by **Melez** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:20 pm

dom wrote:
Tig3ress wrote:**** DOM, WHITE DyE IS EXPENSIVE. YOUR MAKING ME FEEL BAD >.<

EDIT: EotN ftw :3

lulzies

so is black dye

Wooooot. Pretty great stuff. Though the chaos axe is req. 10.

(Btw, why over 9000 armors?)

Post by **dom** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:21 pm

Melez wrote:
dom wrote:
Tig3ress wrote:**** DOM, WHITE DyE IS EXPENSIVE. YOUR MAKING ME FEEL BAD >.<

EDIT: EotN ftw :3

lulzies

so is black dye

Wooooot. Pretty great stuff. Though the chaos axe is req. 10.

(Btw, why over 9000 armors?)

Was wrong setup when I took the picture. I use that for e-denial, I use this:

Melez · Post by **Melez** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:40 pm

Still, why over 9000 armors? For all classess.

Toasty · Post by **Toasty** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:56 pm

Needs to be ready to change with the fashion ofcourse. And probs for different situations.

MasterKojito · Post by **MasterKojito** » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:51 pm

dom wrote:
Melez wrote:
dom wrote:lulzies

so is black dye

Wooooot. Pretty great stuff. Though the chaos axe is req. 10.

(Btw, why over 9000 armors?)

Was wrong setup when I took the picture. I use that for e-denial, I use this:

10k please

Silkroad Online Forums

New sig (should I use it?)

New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)

Re: New sig (should I use it?)