Explanation please?
- CloudStrider
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Away
Explanation please?
I ask this question out of pure curosity, I;m not trying to flame, or troll or start stuff, or w/e.
I was looking through my old posts and I saw the "tedtwillger" (sp?) is banned.
And I think I have seen JKME banned.
Could I please know why?
I ask this because I used to play with them for a bit and I'm curious.
Thanks.
I was looking through my old posts and I saw the "tedtwillger" (sp?) is banned.
And I think I have seen JKME banned.
Could I please know why?
I ask this because I used to play with them for a bit and I'm curious.
Thanks.
penfold1992 wrote:durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S

Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
- CloudStrider
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Away
Re: Explanation please?
Ahh, I see, thanks rek.
penfold1992 wrote:durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S

Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
- Blindfire
- Site Contributor
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:36 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: ...
Re: Explanation please?
On the same general note, why was Crumpets banned?
- rek
- Ex-Staff
- Posts: 5607
- Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 10:46 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: darkroot garden
- Contact:
Re: Explanation please?
I wasn't aware of his ban until i saw it in Priams sig, but im pretty sure it was because of being a consistent problem to some people.
:l
imo, i want him unbanned
:l
imo, i want him unbanned

<3
0len
Re: Explanation please?
About tedwilliger, not sure, but I think it's because he made a really pointless bot accusation.
And Crumpets for arguing with a mod so he got banned (guess which mod.
). Basically, he got banned for not shutting up when told repeatedly. And all in all I myself don't miss him.
And Crumpets for arguing with a mod so he got banned (guess which mod.

- Priam
- Forum Legend
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:38 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: At the apple store, Cause i'm an iAddict.
Re: Explanation please?
meh, everyone knows Crumps likes to argue, so do i, it's not that big of a deal.
His post history around the ban date, shows nothing exceptional. Guess that's deleted.
Just some real clever stuff like:
Clever stuff.
His post history around the ban date, shows nothing exceptional. Guess that's deleted.
Just some real clever stuff like:
_Lana_ wrote:
Stop acting,you will never be Dom
Crumpets: Haha, made me smile.
Go check post history please. I have always been like this .. Dom used to be care bear. How about you go hop back onto Satman's cock and ride back to India.
Clever stuff.

-
cin
Re: Explanation please?
crumpets was heavily warned several times before
he got banned. basically he was pushing the limits
at least twice a week. sure, he was one of the faces
of srf, and priam, you also know how i feel about
his ban. but rule-wise, his ban was completely legit.
he was banned for a good reason and had it coming for
a long time. so i stand behind his ban 100%.
he got banned. basically he was pushing the limits
at least twice a week. sure, he was one of the faces
of srf, and priam, you also know how i feel about
his ban. but rule-wise, his ban was completely legit.
he was banned for a good reason and had it coming for
a long time. so i stand behind his ban 100%.
- CloudStrider
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Away
Re: Explanation please?
Priam wrote:meh, everyone knows Crumps likes to argue, so do i, it's not that big of a deal.
His post history around the ban date, shows nothing exceptional. Guess that's deleted.
Just some real clever stuff like:_Lana_ wrote:
Stop acting,you will never be Dom
Crumpets: Haha, made me smile.
Go check post history please. I have always been like this .. Dom used to be care bear. How about you go hop back onto Satman's cock and ride back to India.
Clever stuff.
Reading that, reminds me of him, and TBH I hope he doesn't come back.
penfold1992 wrote:durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S

Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
- Priam
- Forum Legend
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:38 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: At the apple store, Cause i'm an iAddict.
Re: Explanation please?
Beh, sad everyone's got a cock up their ass about a little sarcasm. I know your opinion on the ban Cin, but still.
He was a cock to some people, people that have it coming to them, as you also know, since you've been around nearly as long as me. Him being a dick to those, in my eyes, is way beyond justified.
Him having a conflict with a mod, is no reason to ban. Again to me that is.
Anyways, no-one will be larger then life and unban him, so there I am. Stuck with Kirk. F*cking bollox.
He was a cock to some people, people that have it coming to them, as you also know, since you've been around nearly as long as me. Him being a dick to those, in my eyes, is way beyond justified.
Him having a conflict with a mod, is no reason to ban. Again to me that is.
Anyways, no-one will be larger then life and unban him, so there I am. Stuck with Kirk. F*cking bollox.

-
cin
Re: Explanation please?
as you said, it's all in your eyes. not banning him
after so many warnings would be playing favourites.
we've let him try to keep it down a bit, like not use
the personal attacks, but he decided he could do what
he wanted. and it cost him. new members have as much
right to be here as old members.
after so many warnings would be playing favourites.
we've let him try to keep it down a bit, like not use
the personal attacks, but he decided he could do what
he wanted. and it cost him. new members have as much
right to be here as old members.
- Priam
- Forum Legend
- Posts: 7885
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:38 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: At the apple store, Cause i'm an iAddict.
Re: Explanation please?
never said they didn't, just that some members have the right to burn their asses, as they deserve it in most cases.

- Ryoko
- Site Owner
- Posts: 6390
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:32 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
- Contact:
Re: Explanation please?
Poor treatment toward new users is one of the worst, in my eyes.
We want the forum to grow.
The statue of liberty is holding a torch to light the way, not a machine gun to keep out people we might not like
We want the forum to grow.
The statue of liberty is holding a torch to light the way, not a machine gun to keep out people we might not like
- CloudStrider
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Away
Re: Explanation please?
Priam wrote:Beh, sad everyone's got a cock up their ass about a little sarcasm. I know your opinion on the ban Cin, but still.
He was a cock to some people, people that have it coming to them, as you also know, since you've been around nearly as long as me. Him being a dick to those, in my eyes, is way beyond justified.
Him having a conflict with a mod, is no reason to ban. Again to me that is.
Anyways, no-one will be larger then life and unban him, so there I am. Stuck with Kirk. F*cking bollox.
What's with you and penises in this post?
So was ted banned because of his bot accusations and their uselessness?
penfold1992 wrote:durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S

Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
- CloudStrider
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Away
Re: Explanation please?
Vinyl is bann'd nao?
penfold1992 wrote:durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S

Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
- CloudStrider
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Away
Re: Explanation please?
Which thread was it?
penfold1992 wrote:durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S

Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
- CloudStrider
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Away
Re: Explanation please?
Yeah, he deserved it.
penfold1992 wrote:durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S

Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
- Ryoko
- Site Owner
- Posts: 6390
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:32 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
- Contact:
Re: Explanation please?
Your sig quote is terrible. Btw.
- fckerr
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 5:02 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Bulgaria
Re: Explanation please?
Im sure Crumpets is lurking around 
And for JKME, he posted banned user's message.
And for JKME, he posted banned user's message.
- CloudStrider
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Away
Re: Explanation please?
Ryoko wrote:Your sig quote is terrible. Btw.
It's more for memories, kind of a inside joke.
penfold1992 wrote:durka durka muhammad gihad allah 10k plys. thats all i hear :S

Mad props to Verfo for the sig, ty!
- Doppleganger
- Addicted Member
- Posts: 2706
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 8:58 am
- Location: Resistance Headquarters
Re: Explanation please?
Has no one thought about a reform in these policies yet?
There are going to be flames that's a given without them this place would freeze over, they keep this place toasty warm and a lot of the time there deserved. The concept of banning someone that uses a loader for 7 days is hilariously absurd and the fact that it's been going this long is ridiculous. They get to come back and yet there still using it so what was the point? I see absolutely no logic in that. This needs to be reversed.
You give the temporary bans to the people that cause a forest fire and you give the permanent bans to the people that use 3rd pt programs. At least when a person gets a temporary ban for flames they would come back and remember that they got a temporary ban and they'll think twice in causing another major fire. You give them warnings but giving them a short temporary ban is more effective.
Code: Select all
Basically
There are going to be flames that's a given without them this place would freeze over, they keep this place toasty warm and a lot of the time there deserved. The concept of banning someone that uses a loader for 7 days is hilariously absurd and the fact that it's been going this long is ridiculous. They get to come back and yet there still using it so what was the point? I see absolutely no logic in that. This needs to be reversed.
You give the temporary bans to the people that cause a forest fire and you give the permanent bans to the people that use 3rd pt programs. At least when a person gets a temporary ban for flames they would come back and remember that they got a temporary ban and they'll think twice in causing another major fire. You give them warnings but giving them a short temporary ban is more effective.
Code: Select all
Basically



Re: Explanation please?
Priam wrote:Beh, sad everyone's got a cock up their ass about a little sarcasm. I know your opinion on the ban Cin, but still.
He was a cock to some people, people that have it coming to them, as you also know, since you've been around nearly as long as me. Him being a dick to those, in my eyes, is way beyond justified.
Him having a conflict with a mod, is no reason to ban. Again to me that is.
Anyways, no-one will be larger then life and unban him, so there I am. Stuck with Kirk. F*cking bollox.

