[SD]Kratos wrote:bump dammit
Ze bumpers!
Amelie wrote:
B
U
M
P

Niyoke wrote:err i know ium soudning weird but .. Mr Bow is my p.e teacher .. ARE YOU MR BOW? LMAO ?

Priam wrote:IRC has bots, which protect channels against abuse. On Quakenet, where i used to be, there's a large scripting community that custom builds bots to prevent spamming, further abuse, bad words etc.
I used to build those, it's not that hard and possibility's are endless. Quakenet also supplies free channel admin bots like L, Q, S, etc.
Limited support is the cause of nobody visiting Site Discussion.

[SD]Kratos wrote:Priam wrote:IRC has bots, which protect channels against abuse. On Quakenet, where i used to be, there's a large scripting community that custom builds bots to prevent spamming, further abuse, bad words etc.
I used to build those, it's not that hard and possibility's are endless. Quakenet also supplies free channel admin bots like L, Q, S, etc.
Limited support is the cause of nobody visiting Site Discussion.
easiest for SRF users would be to bring back the chat room (simple click and u're in). IRC would be cool but our last tries failed

Priam wrote:IRC has bots, which protect channels against abuse. On Quakenet, where i used to be, there's a large scripting community that custom builds bots to prevent spamming, further abuse, bad words etc.
I used to build those, it's not that hard and possibility's are endless. Quakenet also supplies free channel admin bots like L, Q, S, etc.
Limited support is the cause of nobody visiting Site Discussion.
pr0klobster wrote:Priam wrote:IRC has bots, which protect channels against abuse. On Quakenet, where i used to be, there's a large scripting community that custom builds bots to prevent spamming, further abuse, bad words etc.
I used to build those, it's not that hard and possibility's are endless. Quakenet also supplies free channel admin bots like L, Q, S, etc.
Limited support is the cause of nobody visiting Site Discussion.
Yeah, I know all that, but bots never completely filter all the crap or the takeover attempts (that is, if we did not establish a permanent chatroom). It's not like it's tough to jump into an #srf chatroom and post the channel/provider with a link to a Java IRC chat client. Not like I can get IRC past my firewall anyway.
Are you saying limited support is the reason nobody visits Site Discussion?

Priam wrote:Have been on IRC for 2.5 years straight, scripting bots, it damned easy to stop takeover attempts, and filter all the crap. Most hosts are known anyway,
And read that sentence about limited support backwards, that's how i meant it ;p Nobody is showing support for this irc thing, cause no1 is ever visiting here.

Dyegov wrote:It doesn't seem to recognize my password only because I used a lot of non alphabetic symbols... Nah, I pass ¬¬

[SD]Kratos wrote:Dyegov wrote:It doesn't seem to recognize my password only because I used a lot of non alphabetic symbols... Nah, I pass ¬¬
the password thing doesnt work yet, acehart is still working on it!

Niyoke wrote:err i know ium soudning weird but .. Mr Bow is my p.e teacher .. ARE YOU MR BOW? LMAO ?
MrBow wrote:lol, it's empty most of the times.
how about a news announcement to get more members in there.
I think about 1% of the forums visitors read the SD...
