Silkroad Online Forums

The creater of multiple bots, and he has an account here. I am surprised he has not been banned yet.

A past mod has pmed me that the SRF staff knows they are the same person

Unless he was lying of course

proof that srf drew_benton = drew_benton that made those bots?

could just be a simple name steale.. happens alot.

izmeister, your sig makes me lol.

On Topic: Yeah, you need proof. Some of my friends a while ago would name themselves bot names just to have fun. It could just be a joke. Or not...

Hmm correct me if im wrong but, didnt he just invent tools that later allowed people to create bots? Like I belive he created a wide varity of pk2 editing tools, that would be like saying because he made tools that allow us to pk2 edit, he is directly responsible for the stealth pk2 edit we have to day.. although plz do correct me if im mistaken.

you know ur new when...

omg magisuns gtfo

Well, a past mod has pmed me that the SRF team knows they are the same person

Unless he was lying of course



Added to first post

chesticles wrote:omg magisuns gtfo

stop spam and troll post

i lold...



lol

izmeister wrote:Well, a past mod has pmed me that the SRF team knows they are the same person

Unless he was lying of course

Spoiler!

mods hack and boot too noooooooooo FACK selkradfuraam

Drew_Benton created the bot, but he doesn't bot though.

therefore if he doesnt bot, he doesn't get banned.

not so hard to see why the admins/mods dont banned him. rules are rules just like laws.

ThiefzV2 wrote:Drew_Benton created the bot, but he doesn't bot though.

He didnt create any bots, he just made the crack for isrobot, tell the difference.
Creating bot is subjected as bot supporter => banned. He didnt support bot, but only do business to gain money by cracking the bot...

Well, i should offer u some words: "If u want to live happily in peace, let one eye close, one eye open. There is no need to stricly apply a rule or do smt u dont like. Otherwise, the outcome is just war and hatred."

NuclearSilo wrote:

ThiefzV2 wrote:Drew_Benton created the bot, but he doesn't bot though.

Well, i should offer u some words: "If u want to live happily in peace, let one eye close, one eye open. There is no need to stricly apply a rule or do smt u dont like. Otherwise, the outcome is just war and hatred."

Wise.

xD

So I guess supplying bots is ok but using them is wrong according to what NuclearSilo and ThiefzV2 are saying right? So if I made a script meant to DoS these forums but I did not actually use it, I just told people to use it, I would not be guilty at all. Unless I am misunderstanding something from NuclearSilo's and ThiefzV2's logic.

izmeister wrote:So I guess supplying bots is ok but using them is wrong according to what NuclearSilo and ThiefzV2 are saying right? So if I made a script meant to DoS these forums but I did not actually use it, I just told people to use it, I would not be guilty at all. Unless I am misunderstanding something from NuclearSilo's and ThiefzV2's logic.

I'll let u answer your own question:

"A factory manufactures guns and destruction weapons. They sell them to vendors in each city. Then the vendors sell them to the buyers. A police bought one gun. A mafia bought one gun. A mafia uses guns to kill a person. That's person's friend sues the mafia for killing his friend. The mafia sues the vendor for selling guns. The vendor sues the factory's owner for making the guns. Who is right?"

NuclearSilo wrote:

izmeister wrote:So I guess supplying bots is ok but using them is wrong according to what NuclearSilo and ThiefzV2 are saying right? So if I made a script meant to DoS these forums but I did not actually use it, I just told people to use it, I would not be guilty at all. Unless I am misunderstanding something from NuclearSilo's and ThiefzV2's logic.

I'll let u answer your own question:

"A factory manufactures guns and destruction weapons. They sell them to vendors in each city. Then the vendors sell them to the buyers. A police bought one gun. A mafia bought one gun. A mafia uses guns to kill a person. That's person's friend sues the mafia for killing his friend. The mafia sues the vendor for selling guns. The vendor sues the factory's owner for making the guns. Who is right?"

There is no legit who buys bots so your logic failed

Before someone buy a bot, he can be considered legit coz he never used bot before.
My logic share the same analogy as yours. If mine fails, is because yours failed.

NuclearSilo wrote:Before someone buy a bot, he can be considered legit coz he never used bot before.
My logic share the same analogy as yours. If mine fails, is because yours failed.

I am assuming the only reason you put the police officer that bought the gun in there is to represent legit. No legit would buy the bot, else he would not be legit would he?

izmeister wrote:

NuclearSilo wrote:Before someone buy a bot, he can be considered legit coz he never used bot before.
My logic share the same analogy as yours. If mine fails, is because yours failed.

I am assuming the only reason you put the police officer that bought the gun in there is to represent legit. No legit would buy the bot, else he would not be legit would he?

Im not talking about legit or bot who buy/use a bot, but about the seller and the distributor.
So ur saying the vendor and the factory are guilty for selling guns?

NuclearSilo wrote:

izmeister wrote:

NuclearSilo wrote:Before someone buy a bot, he can be considered legit coz he never used bot before.
My logic share the same analogy as yours. If mine fails, is because yours failed.

I am assuming the only reason you put the police officer that bought the gun in there is to represent legit. No legit would buy the bot, else he would not be legit would he?

Im not talking about legit or bot who buy/use a bot, but about the seller and the distributor.
So ur saying the vendor and the factory are guilty for selling guns?

Drew_Benton uses his own bots too, so its not the same exact situation

So if have proof he uses bot, feel free to post, i wont argue.

NuclearSilo wrote:So if have proof he uses bot, feel free to post, i wont argue.

How else do you think he tests his bots?

It seems logic that he tests the bot but it's just only deduction. U dont have the real proof. Drew is not the only one in the programmer team in 0x33. Could be another person, like Clockwork made the crack, drew only give idea and code suggestion, for example.

it doesnt matter if he uses it or not. we all know that he made it and that he distributes it.
syl and deacon were banned for this kind of behavior y not drew benton?

mike2007 wrote:it doesnt matter if he uses it or not. we all know that he made it and that he distributes it.
syl and deacon were banned for this kind of behavior y not drew benton?

It? What does this "it" refer to?
He only made the crack. And the bot is made by the ISROBOT developper team.

Regardless, its obvious he is a bot supporter.

To call someone a bot supporter: first you have to prove that that person is a bot, second is to prove the person is supporting a bot Atm, for me he's just an innocent person got accused without proof but only by deductions and imaginations.
If u cant prove both cases, better watch out your mouth.

NuclearSilo wrote:To call someone a bot supporter: first you have to prove that that person is a bot, second is to prove the person is supporting a bot Atm, for me he's just an innocent person got accused without proof but only by deductions and imaginations.
If u cant prove both cases, better watch out your mouth.

uve been failing a lot in ur logic recently. u dont have to prove the person is a bot to prove their a supporter. if they give out information on how to bot, where to get them, etc then theyre a supporter, doesnt mean they use it themselves.
drew distributes them. game over, end of story, do not pass go, do not collect $200.

mike2007, you are the biggest dumbass on the face of this planet. show us a post where he "support botting". until u do everyone is assumed innocent until proven guilty.

show us a post where Drew "give out information on how to bot, where to get them" and show me a post where "drew distributes" the bot on SRF. u are delusional.

just because he programs the bot, doesnt mean he bots. he did it to intellectually challenge himself. and he never distribute the bot. people flock to his forum to pay for the bot.

rules are rules. without them we are savages

in order for Drew to get banned, you must prove the following per Suicidegrl rule:

SG wrote:[*]Proof of botting MUST be submitted in the following accepted formats:

• Screenshots of in-game chat with admission by the accused
• Multiple screenshots of the accused being harrassed/purpled/non-responsive, wall-humping, etc.
• CLEAR in-game video of the accused botting, using the same criteria as screenshots above
• Links to admission by the accused on silkroadforums.com ONLY

therefore u fail the test idiot

u are just jealous that Drew Benton is better than like the other person