Page 1 of 2

About zoomhack

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 10:13 am
by Confused
I saw a topic about vortex using zoomhack...
Just so u all know that Softmod has zoomhack too and there is no way that u can c that someone bots by looking on the screen only when someone use Softmod..
When i was on Zeus alot off ppl used Softmod and they say that and i knew alot of them..
The screen is the same as someone that is legit..
Only a few bot programs shows some kind of a sign if u bot on the screen..
So everyone that has zoomhack can also use softmod cuz its a part of softmod bot..

Iam not saying that i belive that vortex bots..
Hes name just show up in a topic about zoomhack

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:16 am
by Necrobat
Zoomhack is an illegal hack/3rd party program which is against Joymax's ToS, and most client which have zoomhacks in are generally also able to double as bot clients.

If Joymax wanted you to have a long zoom, they would have implemented it in the first place.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:15 pm
by PR0METHEUS
Necrobat wrote:Zoomhack is an illegal hack/3rd party program which is against Joymax's ToS, and most client which have zoomhacks in are generally also able to double as bot clients.

If Joymax wanted you to have a long zoom, they would have implemented it in the first place.


Exactly. Zoomhack != bot, but it is still 'illegal hack/3rd party software'.

I saw another thread somewhere where they were talking about running a script that drops 1 gold on the ground over and over and over faster than a human could do it. People would use it to trap gold bots. I'd say this script should be illegal, and bannable, as well. It's not the intended purpose of the modification that matters. It's the fact that the client is altered, or 3rd party software is used to modify how the client acts, that matters.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:07 pm
by NuclearSilo
zoomhack = hack
bot = bot

To hard to differentiate? :?

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:02 pm
by chesticles
PR0METHEUS wrote:I saw another thread somewhere where they were talking about running a script that drops 1 gold on the ground over and over and over faster than a human could do it. People would use it to trap gold bots. I'd say this script should be illegal, and bannable, as well. It's not the intended purpose of the modification that matters. It's the fact that the client is altered, or 3rd party software is used to modify how the client acts, that matters.


+1. Anything that alters or modifies the client or that is 3rd party is againist JM TOS

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:47 am
by Confused
NuclearSilo wrote:zoomhack = hack
bot = bot

To hard to differentiate? :?



Zoomhack is in some bot programs..
Same shit but diff names :roll:

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:19 am
by NuclearSilo
Confused wrote:
NuclearSilo wrote:zoomhack = hack
bot = bot

To hard to differentiate? :?



Zoomhack is in some bot programs..

Zoomhack is in loader.
Loader is not a bot.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:23 am
by PR0METHEUS
NuclearSilo wrote:
Confused wrote:
NuclearSilo wrote:zoomhack = hack
bot = bot

To hard to differentiate? :?



Zoomhack is in some bot programs..

Zoomhack is in loader.
Loader is not a bot.


Why argue semantics? Both are illegal in this game. Illegal bot software, illegal third party software, illegal client modifications.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 12:41 pm
by CloudStrider
Pro, details matter when it comes to the bannning rpocess.

Illegal 3rd Party Software -- 7 day ban [I think]

Botting -- Life time ban

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 3:10 pm
by NuclearSilo
PR0METHEUS wrote:
NuclearSilo wrote:
Confused wrote:Zoomhack is in some bot programs..

Zoomhack is in loader.
Loader is not a bot.


Why argue semantics? Both are illegal in this game. Illegal bot software, illegal third party software, illegal client modifications.

Because the thread starter didnt agree that zoomhack =/= bot
No, it's not the same shit :roll:

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:59 pm
by PR0METHEUS
CloudStrider wrote:Pro, details matter when it comes to the bannning rpocess.

Illegal 3rd Party Software -- 7 day ban [I think]

Botting -- Life time ban


Good point. They have different penalties as far as SRF is concerned. Both still illegal in game.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:52 pm
by JKMB
I think the point the thread starter is making, is that zoomhack can be found Softmod, therefore if a SS has zoomhack in, its equally likly to be a botter using softmod, as it is to be a loader.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:37 am
by Phix
also most loaders have zoomhack and most loaders arent compatible with bots.

thats what i heard from dutch_botters guild in Olympus so most of them have softmod.. >_>

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:36 am
by CloudStrider
PR0METHEUS wrote:
CloudStrider wrote:Pro, details matter when it comes to the bannning rpocess.

Illegal 3rd Party Software -- 7 day ban [I think]

Botting -- Life time ban


Good point. They have different penalties as far as SRF is concerned. Both still illegal in game.


True.

But some people use No-DC clients to login easier, not too bot, these might have a zoom feature.

In my opinion these players are not as bad as botters.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 7:04 pm
by Phix
CloudStrider wrote:
PR0METHEUS wrote:
CloudStrider wrote:Pro, details matter when it comes to the bannning rpocess.

Illegal 3rd Party Software -- 7 day ban [I think]

Botting -- Life time ban


Good point. They have different penalties as far as SRF is concerned. Both still illegal in game.


True.

But some people use No-DC clients to login easier, not too bot, these might have a zoom feature.

In my opinion these players are not as bad as botters.

i got banned for a week from srf for saying NoDC Client Ftw... >_>

i dont use one cuz i dont need one PREMIUM for the real win ^^

anyway its against the rules cuz its a 3rd pt programm.. blabla bla...

you know the rest.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:41 am
by [TS]=Hark=[TS]
well if its a recent ss then its more likly to be softmod because none of the loaders with zoomhack in them work anymore sence the update last tuesday.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:01 am
by Millenium
Its true and we know that zoomhack *usually* comes with bot or other multi-client stuff.

However we can't assume vortex bots from his video. That video only tells us that he does use 3rd part software, he probably has modded client and it probably came with a bot, but at this point we can't be sure.

Anyway he's gone for another 15 days or so, if he really bots we'll probably get the news somehow =)

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:55 am
by M3K0S
y post shit that everyone already knows?

/lock plz

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:59 am
by Grimm-.-
CloudStrider wrote:
PR0METHEUS wrote:
CloudStrider wrote:Pro, details matter when it comes to the bannning rpocess.

Illegal 3rd Party Software -- 7 day ban [I think]

Botting -- Life time ban


Good point. They have different penalties as far as SRF is concerned. Both still illegal in game.


True.

But some people use No-DC clients to login easier, not too bot, these might have a zoom feature.

In my opinion these players are not as bad as botters.

Tru.
Testosterone has no dc... also comes with zoom hack... curse filter thing... and other shiz

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 4:19 pm
by Teddybeer
I DONT BELIEVE TESTOSTERONE IS TOO ILLEGAL...
/CAPS
When using AGbot on it its illegal or another bot :S
i dont understand whats wrong with zoomhack tho...
No DC i can understand it makes harder login for legit....
I dont see the problem of loader
Correct me if im wrong but ppl shouldnt get ban from using just loader only proof of bot...
no BAN please as i said : Correct me if im wrong

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:04 pm
by Necrobat
Teddybeer wrote:I DONT BELIEVE TESTOSTERONE IS TOO ILLEGAL...
/CAPS
When using AGbot on it its illegal or another bot :S
i dont understand whats wrong with zoomhack tho...
No DC i can understand it makes harder login for legit....
I dont see the problem of loader
Correct me if im wrong but ppl shouldnt get ban from using just loader only proof of bot...
no BAN please as i said : Correct me if im wrong

Loader is still a 3rd party program.
3rd party programs are against the rules.
That is all there is to it.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:57 am
by Fury
yea and according to joymax's TOS, pk2 editing is also illegal, but its allowed here at srf. If you say pk2 editing doesn't affect other people or the game, nor does zoomhack...

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 1:28 pm
by CloudStrider
Fury wrote:yea and according to joymax's TOS, pk2 editing is also illegal, but its allowed here at srf. If you say pk2 editing doesn't affect other people or the game, nor does zoomhack...



Hmmm, seems a fair point.

But you don;t get banned for using zoomhack you get banned for using the actual loader, but in essence that doesn't really affect anyone either...

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 12:41 am
by Necrobat
Fury wrote:yea and according to joymax's TOS, pk2 editing is also illegal, but its allowed here at srf. If you say pk2 editing doesn't affect other people or the game, nor does zoomhack...

Only Pk2 allowed here is stuff that only affects you. (aka changing how degrees look to you) Pk2 editing that affects others (see: invisibility/stealth hack) is not allowed here.

Further more, zoomhack DOES affect people, as it increase how far you can see and allows you to select people you wouldn't be able to.

I will say it again. If Joymax wanted you to have a longer zoom, it would be in the game to begin with.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 6:10 am
by Glockshna
Ummmmmm, Zoom hack doesn't do that. I used the Testosterone loader once before i found out that its bann-able on SRF and SRO and the zoom hack has no effect on how far you can see other players. It zooms you out yes but you cant see anything except the scenery in the field of the zoom. And further more, you cannot select anyone past the normal field of sight. It doesn't change the area of Players/NPCs u can see it only shows the scenery. I see no reason for it to be banned.

Also... This can be achieved with a pk2 edit im sure. And pk2 editing is allowed on SRF.. so i don't see why this shouldn't As long as no one uses it for the Multi-client, or for botting purposes.

Also, 1 question. Are No-DC clients allowed? Im a bit fuzzy on that subject in the SRF rules. It does modify the way SRO acts but it has no effect on other players, like changing the way ur char looks to u... Is it allowed?

I will put emphasis on the fact that i only used it ONCE. I don't use it now seeing that its against the rules.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 2:22 pm
by Fury
No-dc clients aren't allowed here either cos that makes the "legits" harder to login.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:13 am
by KsqueaKJ
so ppl who are saying loaders , zoomhacks, and no dc clients are so bad?


even if what i say right here gets me banned from this site for 7 days then o well..


but honestly so u all are telling me that u never broke a law? and agree that EVERY LAW is right? and not wrong in anyway? fools.
im sure atleast 76% of u guys download music , so u think u all should be fined or put in jail? didnt think so

same goes for zoom hack and no dc client, zoom hack doesnt give u any advantage so why do u care if someone uses it? and no dc clients shouldnt be looked down upon, cuz lets see who makes it impossible to log in? o ya thats right gold bots. what do we all hate on this forum thats right gold bots. so whats the different from a legit player dishing out 20 bucks for a premium to a company who doesnt deserve that 20, compared to that same person just uses the no dc client? whats the difference? ud rather make a company money, who prefers botters to legits cuz they make more money off of them and who doesnt ban the gold bots cuz they make u guys all buy premium so they make more money, then just use a no dc client?

and i really hope this doenst get me banned from this site cuz im just arguing about what the topic is about so if u do ban me thats just immature



enjoy.

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:28 pm
by ImmortalKiller
KsqueaKJ wrote:but honestly so u all are telling me that u never broke a law? and agree that EVERY LAW is right? and not wrong in anyway? fools.
im sure atleast 76% of u guys download music , so u think u all should be fined or put in jail? didnt think so


Where the hell did you get 76 from :?

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:32 pm
by KsqueaKJ
ImmortalKiller wrote:
KsqueaKJ wrote:but honestly so u all are telling me that u never broke a law? and agree that EVERY LAW is right? and not wrong in anyway? fools.
im sure atleast 76% of u guys download music , so u think u all should be fined or put in jail? didnt think so


Where the hell did you get 76 from :?



rofl i just picked a % from 60-80% didnt want to pick to low of a % or too high :)

Re: About zoomhack

Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:02 am
by Glockshna
Fury wrote:No-dc clients aren't allowed here either cos that makes the "legits" harder to login.


So then everyone should use one. Same chances for all. And it also makes it easier for people that have shitty computers, that cant handle restarting SRO every 10 seconds.

KsqueaKJ wrote:so ppl who are saying loaders , zoomhacks, and no dc clients are so bad?


even if what i say right here gets me banned from this site for 7 days then o well..


but honestly so u all are telling me that u never broke a law? and agree that EVERY LAW is right? and not wrong in anyway? fools.
im sure atleast 76% of u guys download music , so u think u all should be fined or put in jail? didnt think so

same goes for zoom hack and no dc client, zoom hack doesnt give u any advantage so why do u care if someone uses it? and no dc clients shouldnt be looked down upon, cuz lets see who makes it impossible to log in? o ya thats right gold bots. what do we all hate on this forum thats right gold bots. so whats the different from a legit player dishing out 20 bucks for a premium to a company who doesnt deserve that 20, compared to that same person just uses the no dc client? whats the difference? ud rather make a company money, who prefers botters to legits cuz they make more money off of them and who doesnt ban the gold bots cuz they make u guys all buy premium so they make more money, then just use a no dc client?

and i really hope this doenst get me banned from this site cuz im just arguing about what the topic is about so if u do ban me thats just immature



enjoy.


+1 I totaly aggree. There is no reason to pay Joymax money that they don't deserve for a premium when u could just try 6 or 7 times with a NODC client and get in.

And also, no ones perfect. Thats the truest thing u said,

Honestly so u all are telling me that u never broke a law? and agree that EVERY LAW is right? and not wrong in anyway? fools.
im sure atleast 76% of u guys download music , so u think u all should be fined or put in jail? didnt think so