Page 1 of 3

Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:29 pm
by HolyPure
hi

i was for a long time in defiance guild who belongs 2 a moderator here whos name is deacon

he did bot since some time and still claims he is legit, hisnam girlfriend bot a char since months and months and they stick together allways

deacon bot a char calld : hotti
his gf (Cloverdal) bot the char ed MingBums (hackd by deacon, or a so calld friend) since some months, plvl deacons/cloverdale char since months as well

2 prove here are ss

Image


he do alow nw botting in the union, that why 1 of the guilds did leave this eve, here ss
http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/5083 ... 949ue7.jpg

private union forum topic : (copyd from ts cuz i get ban from uni page)

- Sry, but im hallucinating in all colors, and I am not smoking!
I was just afk,and when I got back revised Uni Chat.. and.. surprise! Read the reason why Germans_Vip left the Uni.
Here screenshots:
http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/5083 ... 949ue7.jpg
http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/2593 ... 594cd3.jpg

And I don't know if you all want a explanation, but I want to read one.
How is it possible that the master of a ANTI-BOT-UNION is botting?!?!? WTF Rly u r crazy or what?
I agree with TheGeneral , maybe he does not bot on Deacon, but he use a BOT, and 1 = 100, 200, 1000 all server if u want.

It really suxs.

**EDIT: I forgot say something.. DD u was saying, this is a loader, but read Cloverdale: she agrees that Deacon bot on his other char.

Thu Mar 27 2008, 09:54PM Report Quote
This is Sparta!!!

Registered Member #2
Joined: Wed Sep 05 2007, 01:22PM
Posts: 44

Somni wrote ...

**EDIT: I forgot say something.. DD u was saying, this is a loader, but read Cloverdale: she agrees that Deacon bot on his other char.


That what they suspected on his desktop, was a loader, not softmod + i know how softmod looks like and i can say from what i saw that there was no softmod or any kind of bot there.

[00:15:46] - Deacon: No need to defend myself here.

All I say is. I never bot on Deacon, Deac0n, Defiance, Cloverdale or what char what so ever.

I do on a account that a friend made lvl 80(with botting) And gave it to me. Why would I go legit on it..

Anyway I don't have to talk right what I did. But all I say this is that we are not going on legit.. And Somni, your guild is not legit anymore either But we don't mind anymore =]

[ Edited Thu Mar 27 2008, 10:25PM ]

[00:15:47] *all* Somni: My post rulz ^^" with my nub english corrected by: Mr Hue
[00:16:32] Chin joined channel
[00:16:46] Chin Left channel
[00:16:52] HueHang Left channel
[00:16:57] Splesh Left channel
[00:17:02] Splesh joined channel
[00:17:14] - Pfft Pfft nd more Pfft
Rly u think im idiot or what?
U BOT is same if in Deacon, Deac0n, or on dghdghj name acc. We arent talking here if. my guild is legit or like, cuz all chars pwlvled r NON LEGIT, all ppl play with multiclient r NON LEGIT. But BOT SUXS.
But, anyway, if u r talking about BlackKnights non legit cuz RockLee is here, i can say that he was ask to u if can join or not. Nd u was say: - Yes, u write good english, can join. LOL.
Maybe for u isnt mind, but to other all yes.

TO WHO IS BORED OF PLAY, CHANGE TO OTHER BUT NO **** WITH BOTS. AMEN.

more ss with softmod on his desktop are 2 come, gimme time

bb, holy, still legit

p.s. i cant make threats in other forums, dont complain, just move it, thx

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:31 pm
by OL_Spongey
wrong section fatty.

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:36 pm
by Crumpets
All I see is written text.

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:36 pm
by Backfire
Wow. Nice evidence to go along with it. Didn't expect Deacon to bot <.<

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:38 pm
by Praseodymium
Deacon am not botter. we go wayyy back from the time of the war of the ring. deacon gave me 6 million gold when am was just a noob. deacon is honorable srf soldier!!!!! :)

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:38 pm
by Priam
Proves nothing.

Text can be photoshopped. ESPECIALLY text written in a forum post.

And the union Screenshots are doing the same as you are doing now, Accusing someone without solid proof.

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:39 pm
by HolyPure

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:40 pm
by HolyPure
Priam wrote:Proves nothing.

Text can be photoshopped. ESPECIALLY text written in a forum post.

And the union Screenshots are doing the same as you are doing now, Accusing someone without solid proof.



lol his GF admit in ss , cant u read ? lol

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:41 pm
by Priam
HolyPure wrote:
Priam wrote:Proves nothing.

Text can be photoshopped. ESPECIALLY text written in a forum post.

And the union Screenshots are doing the same as you are doing now, Accusing someone without solid proof.



lol his GF admit in ss , cant u read ? lol


Yep, i saw a screenshot/video of Stefanie writing that text. You know how it is on SRO dude, proves nothing. Photoshop anyone? We've been over this a million times. in the RIGHT section.

Deacon was Farking proud of getting this far in SRO, without bots, and more dedication then anyone, lame try to take that down.

And you were in his union, lal, gg.

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:41 pm
by AkillerNXC
Well...um, from the few words I can understand...it looks like you said he just uses the loader (no dc client -.-). Most people use that, and thats not botting. It lets him login... O_O

I can't figure out what you're saying in the bottom half though. =/

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:43 pm
by Quintus
Image

Image

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:45 pm
by Cresta
AkillerNXC wrote:Well...um, from the few words I can understand...it looks like you said he just uses the loader (no dc client -.-). Most people use that, and thats not botting. It lets him login... O_O

I can't figure out what you're saying in the bottom half though. =/

If he is using the loader, he is still using 3rd party software..

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:47 pm
by AkillerNXC
Cresta wrote:
AkillerNXC wrote:Well...um, from the few words I can understand...it looks like you said he just uses the loader (no dc client -.-). Most people use that, and thats not botting. It lets him login... O_O

I can't figure out what you're saying in the bottom half though. =/

If he is using the loader, he is still using 3rd party software..


Yes, but its still not technically botting. But anyways, how does anyone know thats his desktop and it hasn't been photoshopped, its extremely easy to Add in a desktop icon with PS. Especially with that really bright white background. -.-

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:47 pm
by Crumpets
Cresta wrote:
AkillerNXC wrote:Well...um, from the few words I can understand...it looks like you said he just uses the loader (no dc client -.-). Most people use that, and thats not botting. It lets him login... O_O

I can't figure out what you're saying in the bottom half though. =/

If he is using the loader, he is still using 3rd party software..



G15, Ventrilo, Teamspeak , Fraps.

All 3rd party software that is illegal according too the T.o.S.

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:48 pm
by SuperTanker
OL_Spongey wrote:wrong section fatty.

look who is talking -.-. he cant post in Expesed bot section, thats why he posted it here.

@topic maker: i dont know if thats solid proof... its just ppl talking in the union chat thing..i think u need a screen shot of him botting or something.

i hope he doesn't bot tho T_T. he is a mod.

@Crumpet: i think No-DC client is 1 week ban... isn't it?

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:49 pm
by Priam
Btw, that dsktop screenshot, how the **** are you gonna prove that's his? because his msn is open? lol.

Please enlighten me, and make me laugh.

SuperTanker wrote:
OL_Spongey wrote:wrong section fatty.

look who si talking -.-. he cant post in Expesed bot section, thats why he posted it hear.

@topic maker: i dont know if thats solid proof... its just ppl talking in the union chat thing..i think u need a screen shot of him botting or something.

i hope he doesn't bot tho T_T. he is a mod.


He doesn't, Holypure is a regular in that union, prolly got pissed, and is trying to be teh man now.

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:51 pm
by †erminal
HolyPure wrote:I bot

Proof enough?
:!:

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:53 pm
by buster5995
Priam wrote:Btw, that dsktop screenshot, how the **** are you gonna prove that's his? because his msn is open? lol.

Please enlighten me, and make me laugh.

SuperTanker wrote:
OL_Spongey wrote:wrong section fatty.

look who si talking -.-. he cant post in Expesed bot section, thats why he posted it hear.

@topic maker: i dont know if thats solid proof... its just ppl talking in the union chat thing..i think u need a screen shot of him botting or something.

i hope he doesn't bot tho T_T. he is a mod.


He doesn't, Holypure is a regular in that union, prolly got pissed, and is trying to be teh man now.


He has Soft mod loader icon on screen,

and since hes a mod, dont expect ANYTHING to happen.

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:53 pm
by Priam
u sure it's his screen?

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:56 pm
by SuperTanker
†erminal wrote:
HolyPure wrote:I bot

Proof enough?
:!:

and where exactly did u find that?

terminal wrote:i love botting

i dont know how to right that T :banghead:.

lets wait for Deacon to answer :). i hope he can defend himself.

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:57 pm
by Leon
Priam wrote:Btw, that dsktop screenshot, how the **** are you gonna prove that's his? because his msn is open? lol.

Please enlighten me, and make me laugh.

SuperTanker wrote:
OL_Spongey wrote:wrong section fatty.

look who si talking -.-. he cant post in Expesed bot section, thats why he posted it hear.

@topic maker: i dont know if thats solid proof... its just ppl talking in the union chat thing..i think u need a screen shot of him botting or something.

i hope he doesn't bot tho T_T. he is a mod.


He doesn't, Holypure is a regular in that union, prolly got pissed, and is trying to be teh man now.


Shut up alright, he's been good friends with deacon for some years, and holypure is tired of his hipocricy...

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:57 pm
by NuclearSilo
1. Give us a link to that private forum
2. Proove that that registered person in that forum is this Deacon
3. Give a video or SS (stucking in wall for ex) if possible. Anything related to chat box or SS or HTML are fail.
4. The only thing which is related to Deacon from the pics above is the word "Deacon". If someone edited it to "Cresta" for example, things will be completly different.

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:01 am
by STARNATION
Rofl.

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:02 am
by Leon
NuclearSilo wrote:1. Give us a link to that private forum
2. Proove that that registered person in that forum is this Deacon
3. Give a video or SS (stucking in wall for ex) if possible. Anything related to chat box or SS or HTML are fail.
4. The only thing which is related to Deacon from the pics above is the word "Deacon". If someone edited it to "Cresta" for example, things will be completly different.


Well that reply is unlike you, normally you flame right away at the accused person, making him even look more like a botter.. :banghead:

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:02 am
by Priam
Leon wrote:
Shut up alright, he's been good friends with deacon for some years, and holypure is tired of his hipocricy...


So then.. is this the point where I get emo and feel sorry for Holypure, whom is making false accusations?

i think not.

Leon wrote:
NuclearSilo wrote:1. Give us a link to that private forum
2. Proove that that registered person in that forum is this Deacon
3. Give a video or SS (stucking in wall for ex) if possible. Anything related to chat box or SS or HTML are fail.
4. The only thing which is related to Deacon from the pics above is the word "Deacon". If someone edited it to "Cresta" for example, things will be completly different.


Well that reply is unlike you, normally you flame right away at the accused person, making him even look more like a botter.. :banghead:


normally the evidence isn't retarded.

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:03 am
by blackfalcon
i agree, this proves nothing bro..........

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:04 am
by NuclearSilo
buster5995 wrote:He has Soft mod loader icon on screen,

and since hes a mod, dont expect ANYTHING to happen.

What is a "softmod loader"? I never heard about such thing.
Or "softmod", or "loader" ...
Mind u explain more plz? :D

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:04 am
by buster5995
Leon wrote:
NuclearSilo wrote:1. Give us a link to that private forum
2. Proove that that registered person in that forum is this Deacon
3. Give a video or SS (stucking in wall for ex) if possible. Anything related to chat box or SS or HTML are fail.
4. The only thing which is related to Deacon from the pics above is the word "Deacon". If someone edited it to "Cresta" for example, things will be completly different.


Well that reply is unlike you, normally you flame right away at the accused person, making him even look more like a botter.. :banghead:


+1000000

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:06 am
by HolyPure
we wasnt friend for years, more for 1year, we was brothers, i did belief him 110%

i did leave the game/union for other reasons who not belong 2 him, and they aint count here, its private, all i know, and who know all defiance union, that deacon bot on his laptop the char Hotti, claim leggit cuz he dont bot the char deacon, he did was now full uni, cuz some1 like me got the nutz 2 say someth... damit, i have no reason 2 blame innocent ppl, iam not that guy, but ppl who i thought they are friends, realy close friends, with givin them all the opportunity 2 set things in a good like, i just cant dare, so are f.e. Ephea/Lolly_Babe who turn bot 2 and get ban from Defiance guild after a shit load of time ....

gn now

Re: Deacon Exposed

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:06 am
by Leon
Anyway, you wont get a reply from Deacon for at least another 5-8 hours because currently, its 1:05 in Holland, so my guess is that he's sleeping right now...