Page 1 of 2
Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 5:56 am
by itikew
I can't post in the Exposed Botters Forum so here it goes:
SRF ID: bluetoN
SRO ID: Gift
Server: Neptune
By
itikew at 2008-03-05
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:07 am
by Calico
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:58 pm
by itikew
If I understand his other post correctly, he admits to botting with another character named bluetoN that he no longer plays except to murder. In the above SS, it is clear that he claims to bot with his current character, Gift.
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 6:36 pm
by non ego man
Rev6 shows TeMpLaRiOs for Neptune as well as BufferDanisz so server is confirmed.
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 6:49 pm
by Rush4Life
it's clear, no doubt about it, he is a bot, just ban him!
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:17 pm
by Xyzzzy
It says do you want some time?
Correct me if I'm wrong but does that not imply that you yourself bot?
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:38 pm
by Amelie
Xyzzzy wrote:It says do you want some time?
Correct me if I'm wrong but does that not imply that you yourself bot?
i'm assuming the botter asked him if he wanted to join (to leech exp), since he was letting his bot ON.
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:42 pm
by Azilius
Pic = Not proof
Can't people understand that?
The topic on the other hand...
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:42 am
by MrFudge
Azilius wrote:Pic = Not proof
Can't people understand that?
The topic on the other hand...
pic=proof check the chatbox
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 2:36 pm
by Untitled_
*ban*
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:23 pm
by Xyzzzy
Azilius wrote:Pic = Not proof
Then what is proof?
My god its worse than a witch hunt -.-
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:17 pm
by Jantje
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:26 pm
by Juicy
What the hell u think i was trying to prove in his guild recruitment topic, he botted on bluetoN meaning he bots or has botted so shouldnt he be banned anyways???
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:29 pm
by NuclearSilo
Xyzzzy wrote:Azilius wrote:Pic = Not proof
Then what is proof?
My god its worse than a witch hunt -.-
Proof =/= pic
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:42 pm
by Juicy
A forum screenshot and a ingame screenshot are two different things...
and read the forum posted by sum1 in this topic about bluetoN recruiting for his guild.
He said it himself he botted although i had some information mixed around.
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Fri Mar 07, 2008 10:56 pm
by NuclearSilo
Depends on what u are talking about in pic. In a ingame pic, in the chat board, u can cheat on it using an old tool called nuBot that u can send the packet for the whisper and chat. But I think that tool is outdated or not work and no one mentioned about it now.
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 7:17 am
by bluetoN
itikew wrote:I can't post in the Exposed Botters Forum so here it goes:
SRF ID: bluetoN
SRO ID: Gift
Server: Neptune
By
itikew at 2008-03-05
First of all Im no where to be found in the pic,
2.Hes face down dead.
3.Im not in his party
4.Screenshot toooken march 6 obviously cuz he just posteed it but if u look on rev6 hes already lvl 37? woah? (check rev6 says lvl35 but i was in a pt with him)
5.his guild is a big known botting guild called Recycle_bin
Cough* AKA BLACKWOLF AKA PAPER_BAG *COUGH.
Leader ^^ ^^^ ^^^^ he runs 20 multi clients
Oh one more thing why are you talking to one of my bottin friends??
Merlinda?? i use to hang with her all the time on char bluetoN
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:44 am
by MrBow
foudre wrote:i examined the photo closly, and the letter distance matches as though it were typed to the pixel count, some one photoshoping this or paint would most likily not have made sure that distance was that exact btw its 7 pixels bettween the the bottom of one line to the top of the next one if its a lower case letter, using the gm notice as a guidline i examined the rest of the chat box, i see no evidence to suggest it is false
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:42 am
by Zing
Just to show it is possible to edit the image in MSPaint. It was fairly easy to do, due to the bad quality of the image. This just shows that images cannot be the primary evidence against a person. Though, it's great as supporting evidence.
My edited version of the image:
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:02 am
by MrBow
Great example
You've used the wrong text colour though
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:16 am
by Zing
You can put the blame on the bad quality. Now, MrBow, confess your sins.
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:19 pm
by foudre
Zing wrote:Just to show it is possible to edit the image in MSPaint. It was fairly easy to do, due to the bad quality of the image. This just shows that images cannot be the primary evidence against a person. Though, it's great as supporting evidence.
My edited version of the image:
have to admit you lined everything up perfectly and by the same logic i used to examine the first one, i would have to say it wasn't fake, aside from a slightly misscolored name
but like i said no evidence to say the 1st one was fake, other then word against word
but the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 6:20 pm
by Zing
The whole point of the example was not to point out if it was fake or not. It was made to point out that a picture alone does not provide enough evidence. Weigh for weigh, it doesn't work out.
You can still continue to use this piece of evidence, just gain more material. But without any supporting evidence, other than the picture, bluetoN cannot be banned alone on this. That's justice for you. It was made this way to protect the innocent, though it can be turned around, backfired to shield the criminal. It's a trade off.
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 6:42 pm
by Juicy
IF you read his recruiting topic he said himself he botted, shouldnt he still be banned?
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 6:47 pm
by NuclearSilo
Juicy wrote:IF you read his recruiting topic he said himself he botted, shouldnt he still be banned?
where?
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:44 pm
by bluetoN
lol this forums bunch of a tards ignores my photos.
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:28 pm
by Orotiagito
bluetoN wrote:
Hes admitting to botting right on his own screenshot.
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:09 pm
by Barotix
Orotiagito wrote:bluetoN wrote:
Hes admitting to botting right on his own screenshot.
LoL, self owned. I wonder what the others have to say about this.
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 12:35 am
by bluetoN
Wow LOL!!! i think u guys are really retarded...
It was a point to show the guy who posted the SS of me named kumitsum is in a botting GUILD U DUMB FU*KIN RETARD LOOOOL
Re: Evidence: Another Botter
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 12:43 am
by Barotix
bluetoN wrote:Wow LOL!!! i think u guys are really retarded...
It was a point to show the guy who posted the SS of me named kumitsum is in a botting GUILD U DUMB FU*KIN RETARD LOOOOL
And in the process you indirectly admitted to botting. Anything else you would like to type before you call us "F
ucking Retards" or is your vocabulary high enough to utilize words, other than vulgar slang?
