slimshady CSRO

[Memories]

Don't know if this is enough information...
Does Exposed Botters work even if they're on cSRO? XD
His in-game-name on cSRO is DixieNormus

[Achilles990]

Thats new idk we hated botter in csro too lol xD

[Fresh]

proof isn't sufficient enough, a bunch of other white people like slim shady.

[Zephyrir]

I would rather be interested why a legit visits sites that are well known for advertising illegal stuffs for MMOs.

[CeLL]

I would rather be interested why a legit visits sites that are well known for advertising illegal stuffs for MMOs.

probably because its none of your, mine, or anyone elses business what sites others visit...

[PR0METHEUS]

I would rather be interested why a legit visits sites that are well known for advertising illegal stuffs for MMOs.

Perhaps it's the same reasons that professional IT security personnel might visit illegal hacker websites. One good way to learn about and protect against hacking exploits is to learn about them from the source.

[CeLL]

^^ i was unaware that doctor fantasy worked for JM.

[Toasty]

EB doesnt seem like your kind of place Cell.

[Grounded]

Actually i think botting in cSro is allowed from a certain lvl!
correct me if im wrong!

[XMoshe]

Where's the proof this is the one from SRF? Where is his char botting ingame?

[Toasty]

There is none. xD

[SwordCloud]

Actually i think botting in cSro is allowed from a certain lvl!
correct me if im wrong!

Yep bot in Csro is legal for the 70+ afaik.

[CeLL]

EB doesnt seem like your kind of place Cell.

lol, whats that supposed to mean? just because i dont feel the need to take it upon myself to decide what website others may or may not visit, i shouldnt be in eb?

[Toasty]

EB doesnt seem like your kind of place Cell.

lol, whats that supposed to mean? just because i dont feel the need to take it upon myself to decide what website others may or may not visit, i shouldnt be in eb?

Pretty much, yeah.

You understand Exposed Botters is for "Exposing" botters. That normally involves some investigation.

Looking at what websites people go on is one of the main ways to know what someone is like (investigating). If your against people doing that then maybe you shouldnt be commenting either.

[CeLL]

...thats rather ignorant. you litterally cant moniter anyones actions. i can go to every single botting website right now and make a ss of some random poster with a coincedental nick. does that mean im a botter? on top of that, the only way to know what those websites are is to have visited them yourself, therefore making your whole debate hypocritical from the start. the websites one visits arent anyones business, and if they are "bad" sites, and you know what they are, clearly YOU HAVE BEEN THERE TOO. there is nothing in that SS that indicates what website that is, but you knew now didnt you. hmmm maybe that superficial amount of "evidence" is enough to accuse several people in this thread of botting. i, of course, say this in jest as it is purely ignorant. just as ignorant as what you said previously.

[Toasty]

...thats rather ignorant. you litterally cant moniter anyones actions. i can go to every single botting website right now and make a ss of some random poster with a coincedental nick. does that mean im a botter? on top of that, the only way to know what those websites are is to have visited them yourself, therefore making your whole debate hypocritical from the start. the websites one visits arent anyones business, and if they are "bad" sites, and you know what they are, clearly YOU HAVE BEEN THERE TOO. there is nothing in that SS that indicates what website that is, but you knew now didnt you. hmmm maybe that superficial amount of "evidence" is enough to accuse several people in this thread of botting. i, of course, say this in jest as it is purely ignorant. just as ignorant as what you said previously.

Erm.. your not too bright, are you?

[CeLL]

maybe im missing something.
lemme do a small recap and you fill me in on what im missing

DrFantasy made a very very superficial accusation based off of another gaming site.

then the good doc got told off for excersizing his will to surf the internet as he sees fit.

i question the the authority to moniter other peoples websurfing, then im told im wrong for doing so.

what am i missing?

[Toasty]

maybe im missing something.
lemme do a small recap and you fill me in on what im missing

DrFantasy made a very very superficial accusation based off of another gaming site.

then the good doc got told off for excersizing his will to surf the internet as he sees fit.

i question the the authority to moniter other peoples websurfing, then im told im wrong for doing so.

what am i missing?

This is EB!

EB is where all the accusations happen.

If you question people's authority to monitor what other people are viewing, then maybe you should be questioning people monitoring what other people are doing / using. Therefore EB doesn't seem a very suitable place for you to be commenting, as surely you would be against the idea of such a forum.


Besides, anyone with half a brain knows that most people who have proof of people botting here bot themselves anyway.

[CeLL]

yeah, i know what eb is. but last i recall, its still wrong to make accusations without real proof. if you use someones websurfing as a basis of accusation than that seems fairly weak, if not entirely void. And again, if someone is able to post a screen shot like that, and you can identify the site you are just as guilty as the accused.


I don’t know. Maybe these rules changed secretly within your underground organization.
viewtopic.php?f=72&t=79269

But last I looked they still apply. But then again, im not very bright. I must be the reason this entire thread is fail from the get go...

[Toasty]

But last I looked they still apply. But then again, im not very bright. I must be the reason this entire thread is fail from the get go...

At least your honest.

[PR0METHEUS]

yeah, i know what eb is. but last i recall, its still wrong to make accusations without real proof. if you use someones websurfing as a basis of accusation than that seems fairly weak, if not entirely void. And again, if someone is able to post a screen shot like that, and you can identify the site you are just as guilty as the accused.


I don’t know. Maybe these rules changed secretly within your underground organization.
viewtopic.php?f=72&t=79269

But last I looked they still apply. But then again, im not very bright. I must be the reason this entire thread is fail from the get go...

Don't listen to Toasty. You're 100% correct. Just the simple fact that someone browses a "bad" website does not mean that the person is guilty of doing the "bad" things that the website talks about.

Otherwise, I could be accused of currently playing iSRO just because I browse and post in SRF's GD subforum, since that forum is all about iSRO.

If someone found me posting in a cooking forum, does that mean that cooking is my hobby? Perhaps I'm just trying to find information about cooking some recipe to pass on to my wife.

Now if someone is found posting pro-bot posts in a botting forum, they could be accused of bot support, but not botting itself. Besides, PR0METHEUS on <insert bot forum> isn't necessarily the same as PR0METHEUS on SRF even if the avatar and sig are the same.

Best proof is in-game proof, not some screenshot from a "bad" forum.

[Swindler]

Actually i think botting in cSro is allowed from a certain lvl!
correct me if im wrong!

Yep bot in Csro is legal for the 70+ afaik.

NO ITS NOT. Fucking bullshit some people made up just to keep all the botters away from the beginning.

[Toasty]

yeah, i know what eb is. but last i recall, its still wrong to make accusations without real proof. if you use someones websurfing as a basis of accusation than that seems fairly weak, if not entirely void. And again, if someone is able to post a screen shot like that, and you can identify the site you are just as guilty as the accused.


I don’t know. Maybe these rules changed secretly within your underground organization.
viewtopic.php?f=72&t=79269

But last I looked they still apply. But then again, im not very bright. I must be the reason this entire thread is fail from the get go...

Don't listen to Toasty. You're 100% correct. Just the simple fact that someone browses a "bad" website does not mean that the person is guilty of doing the "bad" things that the website talks about.

Otherwise, I could be accused of currently playing iSRO just because I browse and post in SRF's GD subforum, since that forum is all about iSRO.

If someone found me posting in a cooking forum, does that mean that cooking is my hobby? Perhaps I'm just trying to find information about cooking some recipe to pass on to my wife.

Now if someone is found posting pro-bot posts in a botting forum, they could be accused of bot support, but not botting itself. Besides, PR0METHEUS on <insert bot forum> isn't necessarily the same as PR0METHEUS on SRF even if the avatar and sig are the same.

Best proof is in-game proof, not some screenshot from a "bad" forum.

When did anyone say anything about viewing a website as being evidence to something.


I give up with people who dont even read what i say.

Common sense is lacking.

[Crowley]

I could actually prove that he's botting. He's my academy guardian and is botting 24/7. All I have to do is run over to Roc Mountain, go purple on him and post a few screenshots.

[Swindler]

I could actually prove that he's botting. He's my academy guardian and is botting 24/7. All I have to do is run over to Roc Mountain, go purple on him and post a few screenshots.

Still cant proove that it is slimshady unless he has his cSRO nick in the signature or have posted a screenie in the past showing of his character.

[Zephyrir]

Being interested does not mean it is my business what he does, which sites he visits, not at all. The point of it is that people that report a botter on the way how DrFantasy did would deserve a warn, in my honest opinion.

[CeLL]

he does deserve a warn, for not actually reporting anything.

[NuclearSilo]

Actually i think botting in cSro is allowed from a certain lvl!
correct me if im wrong!

Yep bot in Csro is legal for the 70+ afaik.

NO ITS NOT. Fucking bullshit some people made up just to keep all the botters away from the beginning.

or some made up just to avoid being banned from SRF

[Swindler]

^Dont think so.

[CeLL]

^Dont think so.

dont question silo, his oujia board knows all.