Should low level bards be attacking mobs???
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:03 pm
Ok, I've been asked this a few times, so I'll pipe up with my thoughts here, I'm keeping it to Venus because this is where the questions are coming from in game. If Guardia, Flow or any other high lvl bards want to chip in with their own experiences/opinions, feel free.
I've heard people that bard getting complaints from party members that they aren't battle barding, in addition to keeping the mana up on the party at lower levels (and by that I mean lower than 60). First off, if the bard is only a sub, it's possible they don't want to invest the sp in the attack skills, that's fine, obviously they aren't going to attack, so asking them too is a waste of typing (of course once you get to wings, where bards have mana orbit, you better get some).
As for those that are pure/primary bard, should they be battle barding at the lower levels. This is my experience, I was the only bard in party all the way up to pegs, Why? well one, there wasn't a lot of bards around, and two it wasn't until around that lvl, that the % increase to damage from the dance was greater than having a 4th wiz. So simply keeping mana up for the whole pty was a full time job, you've only got 16 seconds before you have to start again. Now, if you have two bards in the low level and you have the party split for mana cycling, you should have time to attack right? yes, you have time, but do you have the protection, no you don't. With only two tanks in a party, all the fences and quota go to the wizzies and clerics, what does that leave the bards, well the reason we don't get any is because of Noise, we don't get attacked except by champs and giants as everyone knows. This is the benefit of bards, you don't need to fence us. Of course as soon as you attack you draw aggro (same if you use Mana wind/breeze), and while other ints don't care, they have fences, a bard gets one shotted because all he's got to protect him is his soft squishy robes. I truly didn't start attacking regularly until guards, and only then I kept my targets to mobs I was POSITIVE the tank had aggro on or was a non-party mob, if I screwed up and used AoE, I was usually dead soon after. By Gens, my HP, tambours and gear was sufficent enough that I could handle a couple of shots until someone else killed the mob or drew it away.
Also, it's not until 60 that a bard gets it's 2nd ranged nuke, which is around when your heading to guards or Yachas. If a bard before then has to use it's AoE attack that centres around the bard, he's probably going to be dead very soon, either from the inital mob, or the others it aggros.
Guardia made a great guide on barding, and his videos show the true power of a bard, but those videos are of a higher level bard doing the battle barding don't let this colour your thinking to all bards being able to do that. My thoughts on this, is at the low levels, a bard can probably practice targeting mobs and getting used to attacking an OCCASIONAL mob, but if you expect them to attack consistently, then expect them to die, then expect your cleric to run out of mana, and then your tanks die, then everyone dies. Ease up on giving them a hard time.
I've heard people that bard getting complaints from party members that they aren't battle barding, in addition to keeping the mana up on the party at lower levels (and by that I mean lower than 60). First off, if the bard is only a sub, it's possible they don't want to invest the sp in the attack skills, that's fine, obviously they aren't going to attack, so asking them too is a waste of typing (of course once you get to wings, where bards have mana orbit, you better get some).
As for those that are pure/primary bard, should they be battle barding at the lower levels. This is my experience, I was the only bard in party all the way up to pegs, Why? well one, there wasn't a lot of bards around, and two it wasn't until around that lvl, that the % increase to damage from the dance was greater than having a 4th wiz. So simply keeping mana up for the whole pty was a full time job, you've only got 16 seconds before you have to start again. Now, if you have two bards in the low level and you have the party split for mana cycling, you should have time to attack right? yes, you have time, but do you have the protection, no you don't. With only two tanks in a party, all the fences and quota go to the wizzies and clerics, what does that leave the bards, well the reason we don't get any is because of Noise, we don't get attacked except by champs and giants as everyone knows. This is the benefit of bards, you don't need to fence us. Of course as soon as you attack you draw aggro (same if you use Mana wind/breeze), and while other ints don't care, they have fences, a bard gets one shotted because all he's got to protect him is his soft squishy robes. I truly didn't start attacking regularly until guards, and only then I kept my targets to mobs I was POSITIVE the tank had aggro on or was a non-party mob, if I screwed up and used AoE, I was usually dead soon after. By Gens, my HP, tambours and gear was sufficent enough that I could handle a couple of shots until someone else killed the mob or drew it away.
Also, it's not until 60 that a bard gets it's 2nd ranged nuke, which is around when your heading to guards or Yachas. If a bard before then has to use it's AoE attack that centres around the bard, he's probably going to be dead very soon, either from the inital mob, or the others it aggros.
Guardia made a great guide on barding, and his videos show the true power of a bard, but those videos are of a higher level bard doing the battle barding don't let this colour your thinking to all bards being able to do that. My thoughts on this, is at the low levels, a bard can probably practice targeting mobs and getting used to attacking an OCCASIONAL mob, but if you expect them to attack consistently, then expect them to die, then expect your cleric to run out of mana, and then your tanks die, then everyone dies. Ease up on giving them a hard time.