Silkroad Online Forums

I Finally get lucky.

i see a 76 Lock rod with +1 int and +3 str for 1.9m in the Stall net so i buy it i break it down and i find not one but TWO lucky 9th dg stones and 1 focus tab
(Look at bottom right)

Yup. Destroying stuff is the way to make money.

And O_o I thought Narc sold his char? Wasn't he like banz0red from BH?

Your cool.

AkillerNXC wrote:Yup. Destroying stuff is the way to make money.

And O_o I thought Narc sold his char? Wasn't he like banz0red from BH?

No. SG/BHA are deciding or already decided to "back" Narc up the whole way ... SG says its kool to sell accounts but not buy ... gg

SuicideGrl wrote:that being said, the thread i started on the confed forum about selling characters is no longer there, but the ruling on it was that there is no rule on SELLING a character, only BUYING one.

_Panu_ wrote:

AkillerNXC wrote:Yup. Destroying stuff is the way to make money.

And O_o I thought Narc sold his char? Wasn't he like banz0red from BH?

No. SG/BHA are deciding or already decided to "back" Narc up the whole way ... SG says its kool to sell accounts but not buy ... gg

<sigh> It's being decided in the Senate, how about you read everything before you decide to jump to these conclusion. That would avoid a lot of drama.

AngelEyes wrote:

_Panu_ wrote:

AkillerNXC wrote:Yup. Destroying stuff is the way to make money.

And O_o I thought Narc sold his char? Wasn't he like banz0red from BH?

No. SG/BHA are deciding or already decided to "back" Narc up the whole way ... SG says its kool to sell accounts but not buy ... gg

<sigh> It's being decided in the Senate, how about you read everything before you decide to jump to these conclusion. That would avoid a lot of drama.

that would be to easy, clearly he's an idiot....

dont go off topic >.>
grats mate ^^

Gzzzzzzzzzzzz menz..! u lucky bish. XD

XemnasXD wrote:

AngelEyes wrote:<sigh> It's being decided in the Senate, how about you read everything before you decide to jump to these conclusion. That would avoid a lot of drama.

that would be to easy, clearly he's an idiot....

LOL i like how im called the idiot when SG clearly said he would do whatever it takes to "save" Narc. and then Angeleyes said he doesnt want to lose another close friend even tho narc has seemed to "back stabbed" him. i know its being decided by the senate as SG is pussing it too, thats why i didnt say anything further than what i've said so far. i also didnt jump to any sort of conclusions, all i said was you guys (BHA) are deciding to (knowing mikes point of view on this story) or already have decided to back narc up (this part i dont know of) ... but hell thanks for calling me an idiot when you are even considering of allowing a bot-plvl'd char to enter a so called legit guild back in.

CHEERS!!!!

Are you even in a BHA guild at all?

MrJoey wrote:Are you even in a BHA guild at all?

i was in odyssey long ago and PE for a lil while. Then i quit playing for a real life ... lulz

_Panu_ wrote:

XemnasXD wrote:

AngelEyes wrote:<sigh> It's being decided in the Senate, how about you read everything before you decide to jump to these conclusion. That would avoid a lot of drama.

that would be to easy, clearly he's an idiot....

LOL i like how im called the idiot when SG clearly said he would do whatever it takes to "save" Narc. and then Angeleyes said he doesnt want to lose another close friend even tho narc has seemed to "back stabbed" him. i know its being decided by the senate as SG is pussing it too, thats why i didnt say anything further than what i've said so far. i also didnt jump to any sort of conclusions, all i said was you guys (BHA) are deciding to (knowing mikes point of view on this story) or already have decided to back narc up (this part i dont know of) ... but hell thanks for calling me an idiot when you are even considering of allowing a bot-plvl'd char to enter a so called legit guild back in.

CHEERS!!!!

Quite rude to discuss / repeat stuff from a private forum..

Toasty wrote:Quite rude to discuss / repeat stuff from a private forum..

I can say it was rude yes.

of course some things were repeaten from somewhere else, thats called proof. if it was ingame then everyone would be seeing some flashy screenshots.

_Panu_ wrote:

Toasty wrote:Quite rude to discuss / repeat stuff from a private forum..

I can say it was rude yes.

of course some things were repeaten from somewhere else, thats called proof. if it was ingame then everyone would be seeing some flashy screenshots.

Panu you lil fck tard. Good going by you to fck up Fansy's great feat.


Fansy, Good Job man. I havnt had that godd of luck, lol cant even get 1 luck stone non the less 2 of em. Awesome job. (ps, can I have a loan......lmao) j/k man. Gratz

DeputyDan wrote:Panu you lil fck tard. Good going by you to fck up Fansy's great feat.

And you guys say im rude. How did i ruin Fansy's great feat? i just told akiller why narc wasnt banned, dunno if he is .. doubt it tho. still theres no need to personally attack someone like that.

_Panu_ wrote:

DeputyDan wrote:Panu you lil fck tard. Good going by you to fck up Fansy's great feat.

And you guys say im rude. How did i ruin Fansy's great feat? i just told akiller why narc wasnt banned, dunno if he is .. doubt it tho. still theres no need to personally attack someone like that.

Ofcourse people will get angry when you dissrespect the trust you were given for having access to that section. We have had enough of unecessary drama already because of others acting just like you did. Taking words out of its context leads only to misinterpretation. So does sharing another person's opinion, without them being able to explain it themselves.

Try to be more responsible the next time you are trusted with something.