The Alternative to the "Confederation"
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
non ego man pwned everyone. 
Fly; lvl 90 s/s Warrior & LvL 6 Hunter [Avalon * Hero]

Roses are red, violets are blue. NS is a kunt, and so are you!

Roses are red, violets are blue. NS is a kunt, and so are you!
- the_wicked
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 1:49 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Whisperwind [US-PVE]
- seana49
- Hi, I'm New Here
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:13 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: World at large
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
Irony is that the word "jew" is blocked in game, so you would have to have a swear filter to use it in a global.
[/quote]


Last edited by seana49 on Tue Oct 21, 2008 8:00 am, edited 2 times in total.
u r candies, LOL
I_iMaJiCa_I int s/s
- Shazam!
- Regular Member
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:27 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
- Contact:
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
You need to upload the picture to a webserver first.
Venus------------------------------------------------------------------
[PureEntity] Oyukiyo (Level 73 Pure Int Spear Nuker)
[PureEntity] Oyukiyo (Level 73 Pure Int Spear Nuker)Status of PureEntity is LOL!
- SidiousX
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1619
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 5:35 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Everywhereee
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
Shazam! wrote:You need to upload the picture to a webserver first.
You write too much in this topic, and too little in an e-mail that will be sent to me

Thx Kraq for the sig <3
I want you to know that you're the only thing that makes this life so beautiful
- AngloKnight
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:37 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
GlennNL22 wrote:Hell March for Mother Venus! See our legits walking in those nice red suits!
Code: Select all
oh noez i see ppl riding me!!!!!
*** |
Avalon | T3DDY | Pure STR Warrior/lock | 8x ***
*** |
Avalon | SwiftSparrow | Pure STR Rogue/cleric | 4x ***

Avalon | T3DDY | Pure STR Warrior/lock | 8x ****** |
Avalon | SwiftSparrow | Pure STR Rogue/cleric | 4x ***
- AkillerNXC
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 8:49 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
For those idiots who think the confederation is a dictatorship, do you know what a dictatorship is? I'd consider it a perfect form of communism in the making.
Okay, lets consider the "existing government" as the bots. Overthrow of the government. Assrape the bots in every form possible (pvp, jobbing, FW). Simple.
Step 2: Dictator and/or group of people take power. In a way, The confederation could be considered the dictatorship. The "dictatorship" leads the overthrow of the "government". The confederation leads the overthrow of the bots. The "freedoms of western countries" could be considered the "freedoms to party/'play' the game however you want. Every other server would be considered a "Western country". The freedoms that these other servers have (botting, partying with bots, etc) are taken away, the whitelist system takes care of that. Communist system controls the way of life. To compare that to the game, the Communist government in making takes control of the server, the Confederation are the strong ones. Those that fought (bots, bot supporters) are destroyed.
Step 3: "Marx said that when all of the non-communists were destroyed or removed, the government could release its power, allowing every person to be completely equal, both politically and economically."
When all of the bots are destroyed or removed, The confederation would then no longer be needed as "leaders". After that, all legits are considered the same, because they all understand that the game is meant to be played without cheaters. Nobody will need to cheat to catch up, because there will not be any cheaters to catch up with. This produces "Utopia", according to Karl Marx. However same as in real life, this can not be achieved realistically. There will always be those who want more power (botters), and will do anything to get it.
Thats the way I've always thought of it. Works for me.
In his Communist Manifest, Marx said communism would happen in three phases:
1. Bloody Revolution:
In order to create this new society, the believers of communism would have to destroy the existing government. While the term Bloody might seem an unnecessary description, Marx truly believed that a revolution would require a violent destruction of all previous systems in order to set a proper stage for the second phase.
2. Dictatorship of the Proletariat:
One person (a dictator) or a few elite people (an oligarchy) would have to take absolute power to remove or destroy every person that conflicted with communism. Ideas about political and economic freedoms associated with democracy or capitalism had to be destroyed. Marx recommended that this be done with “re-education” of the Proletariat (common people) through propaganda. But Marx went on to say that people who resisted the “re-education” and insisted on religious, democratic or capitalistic freedoms should be imprisoned, tortured or even killed.
Under phase two of communist systems, all of the freedoms that many western countries take for granted are non-existent. Communist governments control every aspect of life, including what jobs people have, what level of education they receive, where they live, what items they can purchase, who they can marry, how many children they can have, and even whether they live or die.
For reasons explained in phase three, no communist nation has ever moved beyond phase two (or what we call ‘practical’ communism). People in communist systems, then, live in a constant state of oppression and tyranny, always fearful about saying the wrong thing or angering a government official. Approximately 100 million people have been murdered under communist oppression, in many cases for no crime other than saying a few words.
3. Egalitarian Utopia:
Marx said that when all of the non-communists were destroyed or removed, the government could release its power, allowing every person to be completely equal, both politically and economically. The word egalitarian refers to this perfect equality. Utopia, of course, refers to Plato’s idea of a political paradise. Marx hoped the world would become a perfect (ideal) communist paradise, filled with people who were completely equal and who would not be able to abuse others or be abused by others.
Okay, lets consider the "existing government" as the bots. Overthrow of the government. Assrape the bots in every form possible (pvp, jobbing, FW). Simple.
Step 2: Dictator and/or group of people take power. In a way, The confederation could be considered the dictatorship. The "dictatorship" leads the overthrow of the "government". The confederation leads the overthrow of the bots. The "freedoms of western countries" could be considered the "freedoms to party/'play' the game however you want. Every other server would be considered a "Western country". The freedoms that these other servers have (botting, partying with bots, etc) are taken away, the whitelist system takes care of that. Communist system controls the way of life. To compare that to the game, the Communist government in making takes control of the server, the Confederation are the strong ones. Those that fought (bots, bot supporters) are destroyed.
Step 3: "Marx said that when all of the non-communists were destroyed or removed, the government could release its power, allowing every person to be completely equal, both politically and economically."
When all of the bots are destroyed or removed, The confederation would then no longer be needed as "leaders". After that, all legits are considered the same, because they all understand that the game is meant to be played without cheaters. Nobody will need to cheat to catch up, because there will not be any cheaters to catch up with. This produces "Utopia", according to Karl Marx. However same as in real life, this can not be achieved realistically. There will always be those who want more power (botters), and will do anything to get it.
Thats the way I've always thought of it. Works for me.
- seana49
- Hi, I'm New Here
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:13 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: World at large
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
Not quoted. Those interested may go to the post by AkillerNxc above and read; it's worth the effort.
Oh, fun at last! A guy who's trying some analysis and moreover chooses not to to recur to assholes, cesspoles and other pleasantries of the sort!
AkillerNxc, what u say is really interesting imo (no irony). To stretch ur metaphor further, i think there have been at least three serious experiments in actualizing communist theories: USSR, PRC and Cuba. Results are there to be seen. All missed their initial aim in different ways (again imho), but always sharing the fact that their rulers eventually turned into "botters" i.e. dictators scarcely caring of proletariat and tending their absolute power instead. I share ur opinion about the unrealistic essence of marxist utopia, and history conforts this opinion, till now.
Yet, all the above said, i'm not able to recall even a single example of a dictatorship of any kind not producing evil and not ending badly, so maybe all dictatorships are not good, don't u think so?
I'm looking forward for a civil reply
Oh, fun at last! A guy who's trying some analysis and moreover chooses not to to recur to assholes, cesspoles and other pleasantries of the sort!
AkillerNxc, what u say is really interesting imo (no irony). To stretch ur metaphor further, i think there have been at least three serious experiments in actualizing communist theories: USSR, PRC and Cuba. Results are there to be seen. All missed their initial aim in different ways (again imho), but always sharing the fact that their rulers eventually turned into "botters" i.e. dictators scarcely caring of proletariat and tending their absolute power instead. I share ur opinion about the unrealistic essence of marxist utopia, and history conforts this opinion, till now.
Yet, all the above said, i'm not able to recall even a single example of a dictatorship of any kind not producing evil and not ending badly, so maybe all dictatorships are not good, don't u think so?
I'm looking forward for a civil reply
Last edited by seana49 on Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
u r candies, LOL
I_iMaJiCa_I int s/s
- Argonaut
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:58 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
seana49 wrote:Yet, all the above said, i'm not able to recall even a single example of a dictatorship of any kind not producing evil and not ending badly, so maybe all dictatorships are not good, don't u think so?
I'm looking forward for a civil reply
There are no good dictators because the very essence of "dictator" ceases to be related with the term "good". There have been monarchs who helped their country, as other similar governments have.
<< banned for being a constant problem. -cin >>
- seana49
- Hi, I'm New Here
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:13 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: World at large
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
Yes Argonaut, do u see where the argoments goes?:
1) Dictatorships are not good (premise)
2) Communist dictatorship is a dictatorship
Then:
3) Communist dictatorship is not good
Now, AkillerNxc, if i well understand, holds the opinion that confederation is similar to a communist dictatorship, then....
1) Dictatorships are not good (premise)
2) Communist dictatorship is a dictatorship
Then:
3) Communist dictatorship is not good
Now, AkillerNxc, if i well understand, holds the opinion that confederation is similar to a communist dictatorship, then....
u r candies, LOL
I_iMaJiCa_I int s/s
- [SD]Master_Wong
- Forum God
- Posts: 9509
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:02 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Plymouth, University
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
good dictatorship, Great Britain, ruled under someone who was not elected to power either gained there position from killing the other person or family
rome no one was elected emperor of rome
both examples of something that is not democracy
dictator under the
define: dictator function of good
# A system of government in which a country is ruled by a single person with absolute power.
A state ruled by a dictator holding absolute power and authority
rome no one was elected emperor of rome
both examples of something that is not democracy
dictator under the
define: dictator function of good
# A system of government in which a country is ruled by a single person with absolute power.
A state ruled by a dictator holding absolute power and authority
MaStEr

credits zelzin ^^

credits zelzin ^^
- XemnasXD
- Chronicle Writer
- Posts: 9841
- Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:20 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: US - Illidan
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
Monarchy is different from dictatorship. You kinda have an edge over the people when you say your right to rule comes from God.
Also roman Emperors still had a senate to answer to and most emperors gained power after the death/murder/assisination of another emperor...
Also roman Emperors still had a senate to answer to and most emperors gained power after the death/murder/assisination of another emperor...

signatures by Hostage Co. <3
~PoP is DEAD! My sTyLe is Supa-Flat!!~
- Argonaut
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:58 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
XemnasXD wrote:Monarchy is different from dictatorship. You kinda have an edge over the people when you say your right to rule comes from God.
Also roman Emperors still had a senate to answer to and most emperors gained power after the death/murder/assisination of another emperor...
Meh. If your people are foolish enough to believe in a deity, they deserve to be subjected to your rule.
<< banned for being a constant problem. -cin >>
- non ego man
- Addicted Member
- Posts: 2699
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 7:26 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Why I gotta do this???
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
Those are all autocracies. Fly would have retained much more "power" if he had not established the confederacy, transferred leadership of the union to Midnight, etc, etc. You guys need to stop thinking of this as a control grab by Fly.
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
You guys are all some silly mother Farking bitches 
<< banned for being a constant problem. -cin >>
- AkillerNXC
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 8:49 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
rofl t0rch. <3.
Someone please produce a Dictator handbook that says that a Dictator has to have bad intentions.
Definition = Leader. Simply put.
Head of state = Leader of a state = Leaders of server (to relate to the game).
Remember a dictator is not only one person, it can be a small group of people.
The direction that Venus is on is towards Marx's perfect state of "Utopia". Once this perfect state is reached (meaning botters/any other form of cheaters are completely removed), the need for the "Dictator" aka The confederation is eliminated. Confederation is gone = everyone is equal, in the sense of their status as a legit. Means that a level 20 nub is equally as legit as any Avalon member.
Now, the way venus works. A group of guild leaders form the confederation leaders. The "elite group" according to Marx. That group of guild leaders is the "Dictator" for the time being. Now, are their intentions bad? Of course not. The "dictator" leads to destroy the enemy, those who appose it. Meaning un-legits. Which is the step we are on now. Once the bots are destroyed, then the Confederation is no longer needed. The "dictator" is gone. After this society takes care of itself. If everyone is legit, anyone who attempts to bot on venus would be against the majority if not all of the server (society). The need for "leaders" of the server is gone.
The people that call Venus a "dictatorship" are referring to the commonly known ones such as the USSR, Cuba, and China (etc). Where the dictator is power hungry and they ran into this problem, with power comes greed, and if someone can't get what they want and they have power, they'll abuse it. (Which is the reason for killings, etc.)
So in a sense, yes, the confederation right now could be considered a dictatorship, and if that's considered an insult, then just lulz. Because there is absolutely NOTHING that states that ALL dictatorships aka LEADERSHIPS have bad intentions. And to prove my point, basically a dictator is a monarch that is not related to the previous leader. How many monarchs have there been that are considered great?
This is just my opinion on how the Confederation is run, and its working great.
Someone please produce a Dictator handbook that says that a Dictator has to have bad intentions.
Wikipedia wrote:A dictator is an authoritarian ruler (e.g. absolutist or autocratic) who assumes sole and absolute power without hereditary ascension such as an absolute monarch.[1] When other states call the head of state of a particular state a dictator, that state is called a dictatorship.
Definition = Leader. Simply put.
Head of state = Leader of a state = Leaders of server (to relate to the game).
Remember a dictator is not only one person, it can be a small group of people.
The direction that Venus is on is towards Marx's perfect state of "Utopia". Once this perfect state is reached (meaning botters/any other form of cheaters are completely removed), the need for the "Dictator" aka The confederation is eliminated. Confederation is gone = everyone is equal, in the sense of their status as a legit. Means that a level 20 nub is equally as legit as any Avalon member.
Now, the way venus works. A group of guild leaders form the confederation leaders. The "elite group" according to Marx. That group of guild leaders is the "Dictator" for the time being. Now, are their intentions bad? Of course not. The "dictator" leads to destroy the enemy, those who appose it. Meaning un-legits. Which is the step we are on now. Once the bots are destroyed, then the Confederation is no longer needed. The "dictator" is gone. After this society takes care of itself. If everyone is legit, anyone who attempts to bot on venus would be against the majority if not all of the server (society). The need for "leaders" of the server is gone.
The people that call Venus a "dictatorship" are referring to the commonly known ones such as the USSR, Cuba, and China (etc). Where the dictator is power hungry and they ran into this problem, with power comes greed, and if someone can't get what they want and they have power, they'll abuse it. (Which is the reason for killings, etc.)
This has never happened in any of the dozens of countries that have gone to communist systems. According to philosopher George Orwell, it will never happen for the simple reason that “power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Orwell pointed out that once a person has all the power humanly possible – and has even in some cases been called a god – that person can never give up the power and agree to a position among the common people, working as they work, and living as they live in relative poverty. (Orwell’s novel, Animal Farm, uses an allegory of Russia’s history to examine this idea further.)
So in a sense, yes, the confederation right now could be considered a dictatorship, and if that's considered an insult, then just lulz. Because there is absolutely NOTHING that states that ALL dictatorships aka LEADERSHIPS have bad intentions. And to prove my point, basically a dictator is a monarch that is not related to the previous leader. How many monarchs have there been that are considered great?
This is just my opinion on how the Confederation is run, and its working great.
- Sir_Nicolas
- Common Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Apollo
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
whats a dictatorship 
<<Banned For Rules Violation>> - Key-J
not really... muahahahaha
not really... muahahahaha
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
its when im in charge cuz im a big dic
Fly; lvl 90 s/s Warrior & LvL 6 Hunter [Avalon * Hero]

Roses are red, violets are blue. NS is a kunt, and so are you!

Roses are red, violets are blue. NS is a kunt, and so are you!
- AkillerNXC
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 8:49 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
Fly wrote:its when im in charge cuz im a big dic
Yeah, definitely all Fly. He's a bots hitler.
- Sir_Nicolas
- Common Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Apollo
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
Fly wrote:its when im in charge cuz im a big dic
Ya.... you do know about big dics.... you probably seen lots...
kiddin... no flames pls.... peace out
<<Banned For Rules Violation>> - Key-J
not really... muahahahaha
not really... muahahahaha
- XemnasXD
- Chronicle Writer
- Posts: 9841
- Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:20 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: US - Illidan
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
Fly wrote:its when im in charge cuz im a big dic

signatures by Hostage Co. <3
~PoP is DEAD! My sTyLe is Supa-Flat!!~
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
Sir_Nicolas wrote:Fly wrote:its when im in charge cuz im a big dic
Ya.... you do know about big dics.... you probably seen lots...
kiddin... no flames pls.... peace out
im home alone for about 7 hours a day and clothing is for noobs so yeah... i know all about big dics
ps: nb loves looking at it over webcam.
Fly; lvl 90 s/s Warrior & LvL 6 Hunter [Avalon * Hero]

Roses are red, violets are blue. NS is a kunt, and so are you!

Roses are red, violets are blue. NS is a kunt, and so are you!
- XemnasXD
- Chronicle Writer
- Posts: 9841
- Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:20 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: US - Illidan
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
awwww snap, Fly with the webc- wait...webcam....
seriously....
seriously....

signatures by Hostage Co. <3
~PoP is DEAD! My sTyLe is Supa-Flat!!~
- MrJoey
- Elite Member
- Posts: 5570
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:44 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Being the forum ritalin
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
and to summarize the thread... "Join confederation or gtfo"
Quoted from BuDo
(Except I Am Vegeta cuz we all know he is a used tampon when it comes to his personality)

(Except I Am Vegeta cuz we all know he is a used tampon when it comes to his personality)

- AngloKnight
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:37 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
argh I didn't read all the communism/dictatorship/democracy stuff but I see Venus ruled by democracy... Denying freedom to bots IS NOT dictatorship... it's like restoring order and applying laws enforced by the government that aren't applied in other servers....
*** |
Avalon | T3DDY | Pure STR Warrior/lock | 8x ***
*** |
Avalon | SwiftSparrow | Pure STR Rogue/cleric | 4x ***

Avalon | T3DDY | Pure STR Warrior/lock | 8x ****** |
Avalon | SwiftSparrow | Pure STR Rogue/cleric | 4x ***
-
nightbloom
- Elite Member
- Posts: 5492
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:11 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
- Contact:
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
Fly wrote:im home alone for about 7 hours a day and clothing is for noobs so yeah... i know all about big dics![]()
ps: nb loves looking at it over webcam.
Yes... Yes I do. Oh baby.
The Confederation isnt a dictatorship, its more like that old Roman senate. It is ruled by the group who suggest the laws, the laws are voted upon by the Senate and the police force is the actual Confederation itself. How can you call that a dictatorship? Each guild leader is like the leader of a state and his decisions for that state are absolutely his. The Confederation is powerful because four legit unions participate in it and respect it's rules. (honestly there are enough guilds for 5 but they are slow to group up)
<<banned from SRF for rules violations: being a constant problem. -SG>>
- Zero_Doom
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 6:58 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
nightbloom wrote:Fly wrote:im home alone for about 7 hours a day and clothing is for noobs so yeah... i know all about big dics![]()
ps: nb loves looking at it over webcam.
Yes... Yes I do. Oh baby.
The Confederation isnt a dictatorship, its more like that old Roman senate. It is ruled by the group who suggest the laws, the laws are voted upon by the Senate and the police force is the actual Confederation itself. How can you call that a dictatorship? Each guild leader is like the leader of a state and his decisions for that state are absolutely his. The Confederation is powerful because four legit unions participate in it and respect it's rules. (honestly there are enough guilds for 5 but they are slow to group up)
Language barriers have been the main reason for that. As time goes on, we are seeing more and more guilds joining one another, which is spiffy. ^_____^
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
caseyd4, you should be burned at the stake for your post111bbqomg
Really, it's sad to see the intense amount of seriousness and negativity this topic received. Especially since she (I'm assuming) was so humble about it and stuck right to the main issue (Being the rules, no botting, no buying from gold sellers). I only read one or two posts after but that was it, I couldn't care less about the rest. Only that it's a shame Venus is like the way it is, not for it's anti-bot ways, but for painfully obvious reasons.
Internets gone too serious here.
Flame if you like, I never go back to a thread I've posted on.
Really, it's sad to see the intense amount of seriousness and negativity this topic received. Especially since she (I'm assuming) was so humble about it and stuck right to the main issue (Being the rules, no botting, no buying from gold sellers). I only read one or two posts after but that was it, I couldn't care less about the rest. Only that it's a shame Venus is like the way it is, not for it's anti-bot ways, but for painfully obvious reasons.
Internets gone too serious here.
Flame if you like, I never go back to a thread I've posted on.
<<- Banned by request ->>
Cya 'round - Sacchin~
Cya 'round - Sacchin~
-
nightbloom
- Elite Member
- Posts: 5492
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:11 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Venus
- Contact:
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
I herd you leik mudkips Sacchin.
*rolls eyes*
Thank god you wont read that. What about Venus brings out the quitters to make posts about how we are doing it wrong? LOL
*rolls eyes*
Thank god you wont read that. What about Venus brings out the quitters to make posts about how we are doing it wrong? LOL
<<banned from SRF for rules violations: being a constant problem. -SG>>
Re: The Alternative to the "Confederation"
Communism, Dictatorship, Monarchy, Democracy: Pick your evil. All the same shit anyway. Venus has no governing body. Venus is run by the rule of law. Ideas, not people, run Venus. There is only the individual; Statism can go fck itself.
Maddening





