It seems you missed the word BUT. I'm growing tired of your insults toward me and going to start reporting you.Eukanuba wrote:Da_Realest wrote:The point was to prove which build is better. The fighting ground was not equal. Of course the pure str is going to do significant less damage because his opponent is using armor. You're only saying this because you know if they had the same gear the 70:70 bow would lose. Don't believe me? Tell them to wear npc gear except for weapon and I guarantee the pure str will win.
The protection you wear does matter. Wearing armor or garment is the difference between life and death for int builds and pretty much all builds. Of course they are equally available but when you're trying to prove something like this the playing field needs to be near equal.
You fail at logic and reading comprehension.
You are criticizing him because he chooses to wear armor. Big deal. It doesn't matter what protector class he chooses. You must have a very bad memory, because right before you say "the playing field needs to be near equal" (which I am in agreement with), you say, "Of course [armor, protectors, and garments] are equally available..."
Equal availability is one of the most important things that level the playing field. You even used the words "equally" and "equal" to describe each situation and in the same sentence.
The type of protection he chooses to use is as much a part of his character as the stat distribution. Yes, it does matter in terms of partiality. It does not matter in terms of what is fair or not. What DOES need to be addressed his is use of alchemy, but you made no mention of that and instead whined that he was using armor against a str build. Your bias is evident when you imply that the hybrid should not be allowed to wear armor against a str build. To be completely fair in this situation, you should have proposed that they fight naked, which is actually not a bad idea. If the class of gear someone is going to use must be dictated by others, then EVERY build has the great potential to suck.
Again, if you are going to say that he sucks for almost dying (which, by the way, took place without fire shield and he did not yet pot back up to full HP after the first fight like his opponent most likely did), then you have to acknowledge that the str archer he fought sucks even harder for losing to him. If you are not willing to admit that, then you are clearly incapable of offering impartial insight on the matter.
I will again reiterate that I do not believe the video is proof of anything other than the fact that alchemy is helpful. Without knowing the information for both characters, trying to say one sucks over the other is moot, as no comparison can be drawn.
I didn't whine. I stated facts. He wore armor. If you want to test something then the conditions need to be as equal as possible. I didn't whine about anything, too bad you took it that way. Biased? Why do you think I said near equal? They both can fight naked in armor, garment, or whatever. We're trying to prove which build is better not a casual fight, that is why we need some controlled variables. I didn't need to state alchemy because its apparent that he has a good bit of it in order to obtain 80:80.
You couldn't see if he was still potting or not when the match began because the screen went blue. When it got to the fight the player in the third person perspective had already lost most of his hp so the fight may have been going for some time now.
I never said the 70:70 build was bad because of the video. My word still stands. I believe any str heavy bow build will do better than a 70:70 bow.




