This is what I'm doing right now.
I've read up good and bad points on this, but would like to see what new things people could add about having a rogue with warlock as a second.
Currently I'm level 11, and have all rogue/warlock stuff up as much as I can, and am going full str.
Please give me any tips you can ^^
Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class
Re: Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class
imo lock is only good for pvp. i should go cleric
<< banned for being a constant problem. -cin >>
- Shadowfox542
- Active Member
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:16 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Olympus
Re: Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class
IMO, bad build.
Rouge:
Massive damage
Low defense
Warlock:
Deal more damage, no extra defense
Bard:
Faster, and noise helps for grinding with DD/CE on
Cleric:
A ton of defense for 45 seconds, and if you get the passives and the phy/mag buffs you have a lot more defense if your running away with a cleric rod in hand.
Also, the only problem a rouge should have is defense, and if the rouge can't deal enough damage to kill someone, then they are probably like 6 levels above you, and will resist most debuffs. At cap, a lot of debuffs will resist on enemies with holy spell, cept' for the lv10 ones, which division/decay are not.
Rouge:
Massive damage
Low defense
Warlock:
Deal more damage, no extra defense
Bard:
Faster, and noise helps for grinding with DD/CE on
Cleric:
A ton of defense for 45 seconds, and if you get the passives and the phy/mag buffs you have a lot more defense if your running away with a cleric rod in hand.
Also, the only problem a rouge should have is defense, and if the rouge can't deal enough damage to kill someone, then they are probably like 6 levels above you, and will resist most debuffs. At cap, a lot of debuffs will resist on enemies with holy spell, cept' for the lv10 ones, which division/decay are not.
- Stress
- Ex-Staff
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:42 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna
Re: Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class
Shadowfox542 wrote:IMO, bad build.
Rouge:
Massive damage
Low defense
Warlock:
Deal more damage, no extra defense
Bard:
Faster, and noise helps for grinding with DD/CE on
Cleric:
A ton of defense for 45 seconds, and if you get the passives and the phy/mag buffs you have a lot more defense if your running away with a cleric rod in hand.
Also, the only problem a rouge should have is defense, and if the rouge can't deal enough damage to kill someone, then they are probably like 6 levels above you, and will resist most debuffs. At cap, a lot of debuffs will resist on enemies with holy spell, cept' for the lv10 ones, which division/decay are not.
Sleep / Stun -> Debuff -> sleep/stun again -> DD -> Prick.
'nuff said.
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.
- Shadowfox542
- Active Member
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:16 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Olympus
Re: Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class
Stress wrote:Shadowfox542 wrote:IMO, bad build.
Rouge:
Massive damage
Low defense
Warlock:
Deal more damage, no extra defense
Bard:
Faster, and noise helps for grinding with DD/CE on
Cleric:
A ton of defense for 45 seconds, and if you get the passives and the phy/mag buffs you have a lot more defense if your running away with a cleric rod in hand.
Also, the only problem a rouge should have is defense, and if the rouge can't deal enough damage to kill someone, then they are probably like 6 levels above you, and will resist most debuffs. At cap, a lot of debuffs will resist on enemies with holy spell, cept' for the lv10 ones, which division/decay are not.
Sleep / Stun -> Debuff -> sleep/stun again -> DD -> Prick.
'nuff said.
Bless->DD->Stealth->Prick.
I suppose they are both good builds, but I think cleric is a lot better for group pvp/jobbing, as bless applies to party, without being any worse in 1v1. Ress has saved my trader and fellow hunters a whole lot.
Re: Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class
IMO i prefer speed over defense . i won't be buying horses any more . i won't spend 100k every time i go grind for speed scroll .
+ there are already plenty of clerics around like 80% of wizards has cleric as a sup & 80% of the warriors are the same .
though it's very rare to find a full bard .
-----------------------------------------
anyway warlock sub is a pure pvp build
+ it needs a lot of farming
------------------------------------
@ topic starter if you are not getting
pfarmed go pure rogue (only 1 weapon) with gap 0 till cap
+ there are already plenty of clerics around like 80% of wizards has cleric as a sup & 80% of the warriors are the same .
though it's very rare to find a full bard .
-----------------------------------------
anyway warlock sub is a pure pvp build
+ it needs a lot of farming
------------------------------------
@ topic starter if you are not getting
pfarmed go pure rogue (only 1 weapon) with gap 0 till cap
- Shadowfox542
- Active Member
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:16 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Olympus
Re: Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class
Ash wrote:IMO i prefer speed over defense . i won't be buying horses any more . i won't spend 100k every time i go grind for speed scroll .
+ there are already plenty of clerics around like 80% of wizards has cleric as a sup & 80% of the warriors are the same .
though it's very rare to find a full bard .
-----------------------------------------
anyway warlock sub is a pure pvp build
+ it needs a lot of farming
------------------------------------
@ topic starter if you are not getting
pfarmed go pure rogue (only 1 weapon) with gap 0 till cap
Yea, Bard is certainly helpful sub, but with xbow the range is enough that moving march isn't THAT useful, though noise helps when using CE.
Warlock/xbow/dags
Enjoy your farming, good in pvp/pve
Cleric/xbow/dags
Slightly less farming, slightly better in PvE, about the same in pvp (Imo)
Bard/Xbow/dags
Not a lot of farming, bard is useless in pvp, and excellent in pve.
bard/xbow
Little farming, levels quickly, not great in pvp
