Page 1 of 1

Questionable Build

Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:57 pm
by keshi21
Okay so I've been thinking, I have a 2:1 Build spear int hybrid. But I've been noticing the force skills that weaken an enemy: decay, weaken and impotent. And I kinda want all of those so I can hit harder and take less damage. But the problem is i need it to be lvl 80 to have all three. So for masteries I was thinking 80 Heuksal 80 fire 80 Force and 60 light. The problem here is losing out on phys def and snow. But with impotent will the weakening of mag and phys attack make up for it? So please give me constructive feedback and inputs. Please not crap like "thats stupid" or "your build will suck" cuz those are quite annoying. Thank you =)

Re: Questionable Build

Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:18 pm
by alcoholic
seems very good to me i might even do this build.

there is a little problem to me tho at 90 cap your light would be lvl 30 thats not very effeictvive to me.
i suggest for 90 cap
90 hueskal
90 light
90 force
30 fire.

dont worry about not having snowsheild. i have a hybrid int 1:4 spear and i surive perfectly fine with out snow sheild.

Re: Questionable Build

Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:22 pm
by keshi21
Nice =) I was thinking of that too for the 90 cap. Thanks for the reply.

Re: Questionable Build

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:50 am
by keshi21
Anyone else have any input? =/

Re: Questionable Build

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:45 am
by monkey289
I'd do what alcoholic said, but personally I'd go for ice over fire. Also, lightning nukes are stronger than fire nukes :)

Re: Questionable Build

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:01 am
by gorste91
Hey all,

well a force build is something really nice. I will go force pure str archer. There r basically two buildvariations force will be pointless against. This is against another force and any cleric build. Cleric is immune.. and other force builds can simply heal themselves from stats.
So everybody who picks this build will weaken it at the same time.
Well but reskilling force to another element wont take too long eigther so its not that bad.

Re: Questionable Build

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:01 pm
by keshi21
monkey289 wrote:I'd do what alcoholic said, but personally I'd go for ice over fire. Also, lightning nukes are stronger than fire nukes :)

haha well, eventually i'll lose either fire or cold by 100 cap, even by 90 cap 30 fire/cold isn't too great. And since I'm a 2:1 int hybrid, I don't use nukes so I need the phys damage buff. Thank you for your input =)

gorste91 wrote:Hey all,

well a force build is something really nice. I will go force pure str archer. There r basically two buildvariations force will be pointless against. This is against another force and any cleric build. Cleric is immune.. and other force builds can simply heal themselves from stats.
So everybody who picks this build will weaken it at the same time.
Well but reskilling force to another element wont take too long eigther so its not that bad.


This is very true but I guess, with force I'll be able to heal myself out of status effects as well. And those who dont have force that I pvp will have trouble with the status effects. But overall its not just pvp but pve as well cuz the debuff effects will work great on enemies. And for future caps, for losing phys damage on fire, the debuff of def will make it seem I have an attack buff. And for losing phys def on ice and the attack debuff will make it seem I have a def buff. So maybe force can give me best of both worlds? I don't know haha. Thank you for your input

Re: Questionable Build

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:54 pm
by -.-
pve not good since the cool down is too long for nukers to sit around and wait

you dont really need ice for snow shield :S people pvp before without it... they can still do it, just makes tanking more troublesome but not impossible

Re: Questionable Build

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:16 am
by keshi21
-.- wrote:pve not good since the cool down is too long for nukers to sit around and wait

you dont really need ice for snow shield :S people pvp before without it... they can still do it, just makes tanking more troublesome but not impossible


Nukers? Oh I was mentioning this build for 2:1 or even perhaps 2:3 build so those builds don't really use nukes necessarily. True snow shield isnt necessary but man its like impossible to kill bladers who use it lol

Re: Questionable Build

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 4:40 am
by -.-
well with like a 30 second cooldown you wont be using it in pve since fights dont last that long :S

Re: Questionable Build

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 7:50 pm
by keshi21
lol thats true, mobs die so fast one on one lol its kinda sad. Thanks for your input =) I hope more people post their opinions.