Page 1 of 1

warlock + bard. OR bard+cleric

Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:32 pm
by maxie2
Please tell me what you think :). with the bard - cleric i will take the bard as mane clas and cleric as sub ;)

Re: warlock+ bard sub or Cleric +bard sub

Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:38 pm
by noobert mclagg
Warlock/bard: Pros: very good a pve, vast moving speed, useful in parties, good in pvp, somewhat unique.
Cons: not as good at pvp as warlock/cleric, u will die more then warlock/cleric.

Cleric/bard: Decent at pve, can tank ok with the cleric and bard buffs on, very useful in parties, decent at pvp, guild will want u.
Cons: needs a lot of sp to max both trees, does not do that much damage, kinda slow at lvling

Re: warlock + bard. OR bard+cleric

Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:46 pm
by Bounzzer
noobert mclagg wrote:Warlock/bard: Pros: very good a pve, vast moving speed, useful in parties, good in pvp, somewhat unique.
Cons: not as good at pvp as warlock/cleric, u will die more then warlock/cleric.

Cleric/bard: Decent at pve, can tank ok with the cleric and bard buffs on, very useful in parties, decent at pvp, guild will want u.
Cons: needs a lot of sp to max both trees, does not do that much damage, kinda slow at lvling



I agree whit all.

Re: warlock + bard. OR bard+cleric

Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:06 pm
by maxie2
noobert mclagg wrote:Warlock/bard: Pros: very good a pve, vast moving speed, useful in parties, good in pvp, somewhat unique.
Cons: not as good at pvp as warlock/cleric, u will die more then warlock/cleric.

Cleric/bard: Decent at pve, can tank ok with the cleric and bard buffs on, very useful in parties, decent at pvp, guild will want u.
Cons: needs a lot of sp to max both trees, does not do that much damage, kinda slow at lvling


Ok i think bard and cleric will do good. I like the point that your good in a party :). Love partying :D

Re: warlock + bard. OR bard+cleric

Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:56 pm
by Bounzzer
be sure to find a good party and your stuck on this char 8)
goodluck.