wizard or warlock
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 6:44 pm
what is best when you are a higher level wizard or warlock
Silkroad Online Forums
Free Forums for Silkroad Online players.
https://dev.silkroadforums.com/
wizard or warlock
Page 1 of 1
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 8:20 pm
ill say wizard cuz he hae some strong attack and warlock are most debuff
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 4:56 pm
I'd say warlock if you want to have fun. In wizards, all you do is 1hit and kill, than someone else kills you. It's boring IMO. Warlock you have funner lasting PVPs in which others can't call you unfair/scared
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 4:57 pm
Warlock looks way more cooler ^^
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:51 pm
ok so what would be strongest killing monsters and people and what would be a good sub class
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:02 pm
ok so overall what would be best wizard or warlock and this is overall
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:08 pm
i'd say warlock, they look so cool in pvp and way more fun then a wizzy
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:17 pm
or you can get both >:O lol its up to you. i've tried both builds and as ppl have mentioned before me, wizard is mainly a 1hit (or 2) kill build. warlock requires a little more effort put in but warlocks can take on giants while wizards can't...alone anyways...atleast in my experience. 
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:47 am
awwh now i feel all stupid, im a wizard well im not yet but im farming to be, blahhh oh well wizards aere good in wars so thats good for me 
even tho im never awake for fortress wars 
maybe ill make a warlock next? hmmm or maybe i could even just de level wizard and switch it to warlock IDK
well im not yet but im farming to be, blahhh oh well wizards aere good in wars so thats good for me even tho im never awake for fortress wars maybe ill make a warlock next? hmmm or maybe i could even just de level wizard and switch it to warlock IDK Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:07 am
exact wrote:i'd say warlock, they look so cool in pvp and way more fun then a wizzy
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:26 am
warlock all the way.
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:35 pm
wizzies owns. if you want to kill mostly every1 1 hit choose a wizard but if u think its funnier to suck up the hp of others and have a long boring pvp spending pots btw
choose warlock
choose warlock
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:37 pm
I voted for wizards just that massive damage 
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:08 pm
Sir_Nicolas wrote:wizzies owns. if you want to kill mostly every1 1 hit choose a wizard but if u think its funnier to suck up the hp of others and have a long boring pvp spending pots btw
choose warlock
In a warlock pvp, if you use your character correctly, the only pots used will be mp, and the fight wont be longer then 10 seconds, regardless of gear. And any real warlock doesnt suck hp for the hp, but rather for the status effect it gives.
And in 1v1, warlock is the best pvp build, without a doubt. At level 74, a warlock can take down a fully sun set, sun weapon, level 80 fully farmed player. Blader, glaive, or whatever the build doesnt really matter. Only downside is that warlock cant go invisible lol
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:18 pm
iam warlock it fun to do status effects on multiple mobs and suck the like out of the monsters. and run from them well they die from the ststus effects.
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:40 pm
ok so what if i had wizard with warlock sub class or other way round, would that be good
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:55 pm
better take a cleric as sub 
warlock/cleric
wizard/cleric
warlock/cleric
wizard/cleric
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 3:53 am
maybe i should de level my wizard stuff since its so low since im farming, then add warlock.
hmm just a thought, idk if i should do it
hmm just a thought, idk if i should do it
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:04 am
I like risking my life Lolz, ive tried both builds and I say wiz hurray ~ !
You gotta run alot and kill alot lolz...
You gotta run alot and kill alot lolz...
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:15 am
why not both? perfect combination.
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:19 pm
Zycor wrote:Sir_Nicolas wrote:wizzies owns. if you want to kill mostly every1 1 hit choose a wizard but if u think its funnier to suck up the hp of others and have a long boring pvp spending pots btw
choose warlock
In a warlock pvp, if you use your character correctly, the only pots used will be mp, and the fight wont be longer then 10 seconds, regardless of gear. And any real warlock doesnt suck hp for the hp, but rather for the status effect it gives.
And in 1v1, warlock is the best pvp build, without a doubt. At level 74, a warlock can take down a fully sun set, sun weapon, level 80 fully farmed player. Blader, glaive, or whatever the build doesnt really matter. Only downside is that warlock cant go invisible lol
sounds like u pvped zeros warlock b4 u were hacked
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:15 pm
I would go warlock because they are so cool. For ur warlock/wiz question, u could do that build but it takes a lot of sp an dies more then warlock/cleric, but the damage is insane.
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 1:31 am
miladq88 wrote:Zycor wrote:Sir_Nicolas wrote:wizzies owns. if you want to kill mostly every1 1 hit choose a wizard but if u think its funnier to suck up the hp of others and have a long boring pvp spending pots btw
choose warlock
In a warlock pvp, if you use your character correctly, the only pots used will be mp, and the fight wont be longer then 10 seconds, regardless of gear. And any real warlock doesnt suck hp for the hp, but rather for the status effect it gives.
And in 1v1, warlock is the best pvp build, without a doubt. At level 74, a warlock can take down a fully sun set, sun weapon, level 80 fully farmed player. Blader, glaive, or whatever the build doesnt really matter. Only downside is that warlock cant go invisible lol
sounds like u pvped zeros warlock b4 u were hacked
either that, or i played zero's warlock. we been friends since early 70 cap, mayb 60 cap, dun rememba that far back.
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:52 pm
Life Control sucks.
I managed to kill 7x wizzard botter (72+5 staff) when i was lv57.
Warlocks, especially with cleric sub are so hard to kill, there's like no pot delay for them you know.
Disease + Bloody Trap + Sleep = Rape (every build; you can laugh them in the face - they can't do a thing)
I managed to kill 7x wizzard botter (72+5 staff) when i was lv57.
Warlocks, especially with cleric sub are so hard to kill, there's like no pot delay for them you know.
Disease + Bloody Trap + Sleep = Rape (every build; you can laugh them in the face - they can't do a thing)
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:59 pm
wiz/warlock
calculated, 324k sp for only the skills necessary fr both class
calculated, 324k sp for only the skills necessary fr both class
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:28 am
I think that of all the Euro chars A Warlock/Cleric would be pretty much untouchable
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 4:44 pm
Warlocks arenn't that fun, some people like them i tried multiple times to like it and i coudlnt' like it. They are how ever usefull to have around
Though a wizzard now thats fun, people say kill and get killed is boring, blah makes it exciting. Those are just str typical types speaking. Listen to another int, wizzards are fun, i like being able to die easily, it means i have to be carefull, it means i have to kill fast, and some times it means i have to run fast.
Though a wizzard now thats fun, people say kill and get killed is boring, blah makes it exciting. Those are just str typical types speaking. Listen to another int, wizzards are fun, i like being able to die easily, it means i have to be carefull, it means i have to kill fast, and some times it means i have to run fast.
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:10 pm
foudre wrote:Warlocks arenn't that fun, some people like them i tried multiple times to like it and i coudlnt' like it. They are how ever usefull to have around
Though a wizzard now thats fun, people say kill and get killed is boring, blah makes it exciting. Those are just str typical types speaking. Listen to another int, wizzards are fun, i like being able to die easily, it means i have to be carefull, it means i have to kill fast, and some times it means i have to run fast.
Make up your mind foudre, cause so far, you don't know what you want for your sub.
Re: wizard or warlock
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:25 pm
foudre wrote:Warlocks arenn't that fun, some people like them i tried multiple times to like it and i coudlnt' like it. They are how ever usefull to have around
Though a wizzard now thats fun, people say kill and get killed is boring, blah makes it exciting. Those are just str typical types speaking. Listen to another int, wizzards are fun, i like being able to die easily, it means i have to be carefull, it means i have to kill fast, and some times it means i have to run fast.
if you combine warlock and wizard you wont need to run.