Page 1 of 1
should i take fire?
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:45 pm
by Rakion
well i currently playing pserver but enough about that.
i'm a 73% mag. balanced nuker. planning for 70 heuk.,70 cold, 70 light, yeah very big HP

around 2.2k on lvl 37 and i am gaping 7 right now i got 10k sp should i get fire nukes?
or is anyone disagreeing about my mag. balance?...
or should i continue on my build and never add fire?
last Q: should i use prot. or armor?
Re: should i take fire?
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:30 am
by ontaria
73% mag balance shouldn't really use nukes IMO, unless you have full INT gear. Anyways, maybe you should consider taking fire over ice since the extra damage can only help you

Re: should i take fire?
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:12 am
by MrSonic
Definitely drop Fire, you will sacrifice a bit of damage at the lower levels and imbue-wise but the Snow Shield will help you greatly, and after all you won't miss much, the flame body and passive are pretty much useless for nukers, and you already got loads of mag. defence so the only buff you will really miss is Fire Shield. As for the damage at higher levels, the last Lightning nuke does more damage then the Fire one.
Also raise your mag. balance to at least 85% or your nukes would be rather weak.
Re: should i take fire?
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:56 pm
by wdwarrior
agreed. dropping fire wont harm you. and even when it comes to imbues the difference between lightning and fire are marginal. an ice/lightning nuker has strong defence and exellent damage while a fire/lightning nuker will have about equal damage but a very weak defence so just keep maxing ice and lightning
Re: should i take fire?
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:01 pm
by Rakion
thanks guys i totally appreciate your replies ^^
now i think my mag. balance is a wreck ... would 83% mag. balance work?
and what should i use? armor, prot., garm?
Re: should i take fire?
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:03 pm
by Bounzzer
I would try to get around 90% mag balance, wear protector since your hybrid...(just my opinion)
Re: should i take fire?
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:53 pm
by Rakion
well i still need more replies on this thread before i make a final decision about my mag. balance.
I'm still sticking with 83% mag. bal. , i will have enough HP to tank.
@Bounzzer:
i like the idea your giving, since nukers are more about mag. damage, so i must rise the mag. balance to 90% , but the downfall though i that i got less HP thus making me the prime target or the most vunerable member among my team on PvP's and Wars since i wreak havok and stuff's. i agree to go with 90% if i'm S/S.
thanks btw for your opinion on the mag. balance ^^ , but my main point is "Tank" and also give a nerve racking mag. damage.