was destined for warlock/cleric but aft watching PurePainCrew 1H/warlock vid. i was abit swayed towards 1H, but mine was the reverse
i was thinking of pure int warlock in heavy armour, but since so many warrior skills will not stay aft weapon change, it seems the benefit of 1H subclass is only the shield trash/crush and heavy armour, which may not be worthwhile to lvl up the warrior class
warlock/cleric seems not too bad wif light armour, heal, bless spell staying aft weapon change (but glory armour etc. will not hv effect aft switching cleric rod to warlock rod)
warlock/1H seems a novel idea but the benefit of 1H subclass is far too few compared to cleric subclass...any opinions ppl?
PS: i dun really want a str char so 1H wif warlock sub like PurePainCrew is out of qn...
Warlock/Cleric vs. Warlock/1H Sword
-
juntakashi
- Active Member
- Posts: 751
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:48 am
Warlock/Cleric vs. Warlock/1H Sword
Mercury Blader 5X
9 gap farming lvl 60 @ yeti
Guild: Death_Note
Very keen in making another build:
Warlock/Cleric
9 gap farming lvl 60 @ yeti
Guild: Death_Note
Very keen in making another build:
Warlock/Cleric
-
Sylhana
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 3467
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 8:05 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Babel
As you correctly noted, 1h warrior/warlock is good only when 1h warrior attacks form part of the chars offensive arsenal (which means str heavy or pure str), with warlock skills being the sub and assisting.
Cleric skills would help your warlock main much more than warrior would (also being int heavy or pure int). Unless you want to level up another char, stick to your original char plan. Warlock main with cleric sub is an excellent choice
.
Cleric skills would help your warlock main much more than warrior would (also being int heavy or pure int). Unless you want to level up another char, stick to your original char plan. Warlock main with cleric sub is an excellent choice
-
juntakashi
- Active Member
- Posts: 751
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:48 am
okie...was thinking "hey no 1 mention warlock/1H before so maybe its a novel idea" and pure int warlock in heavy armour will look awesome (at least nv seen any 1 doing that yet)
if only warrior iron/mana skin stays aft weap change, i would hv gone for warlock/1H for sure
but meh....warlock/cleric will be final for me xD
if only warrior iron/mana skin stays aft weap change, i would hv gone for warlock/1H for sure
but meh....warlock/cleric will be final for me xD
Mercury Blader 5X
9 gap farming lvl 60 @ yeti
Guild: Death_Note
Very keen in making another build:
Warlock/Cleric
9 gap farming lvl 60 @ yeti
Guild: Death_Note
Very keen in making another build:
Warlock/Cleric
-
Sylhana
- Veteran Member
- Posts: 3467
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 8:05 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Babel
juntakashi wrote:okie...was thinking "hey no 1 mention warlock/1H before so maybe its a novel idea" and pure int warlock in heavy armour will look awesome (at least nv seen any 1 doing that yet)
if only warrior iron/mana skin stays aft weap change, i would hv gone for warlock/1H for sure![]()
but meh....warlock/cleric will be final for me xD
Theres a char on Hercules, 1h warrior/warlock int 2:1. Seems decent in pvp, but the char is only 6x. Theres also a vid about a 1h warrior/warlock hybrid somewhere (you've probably seen it).
If iron/mana skin stayed after weapon switch, more builds would have warrior as a subclass