Page 1 of 1

Attack Rate Increase V.S. Increase Phy Damage

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:17 pm
by xMoDx
Attack Rate Increase V.S. Increase Phy Damage....




PS: i cant find this post on search so ill just post it,



to admin: if this post is already been posted and feel annoying, moderators feel free to delete this, thanks

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:26 pm
by 3DoorsDown
i think its ATT cuz... bowers needs to be fast..faster dmg...faster kill :P

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 6:54 pm
by Dark_Force
blue hawk ftw :wink:

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:24 pm
by Sekkaigan
well i would go phys because looks are EVERYTHING :P

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:30 pm
by xMoDx
hmmmm but technically which would be advisable for pvp and pve? phy dmg for pvp and attrate for pve? yes? no? :?

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:18 pm
by glavie
Depends on your weapon.

Good weapon you want blue hawk to take advantage of weapon.

Crappy weapon you want an independent damage increase.



I don't think anyone has actually tested it though :( so I can't say 100% sure.

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:52 pm
by tomiotar
I would suggest lightning for pve and blue for pvp because against a good defence (player defence) the bird damage is too low, but it can be usefull against mobs that have lower defence and maybe save 1 arrow.


PS: I use just blue and didnt farm the lighting.

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:27 pm
by xMoDx
if going with attack rate for pvp and your opponent has high parry it will null the damage and makes the blue hawk useless... right? so if using increase physical its a positive damage? correct me if im wrong.....

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 9:51 pm
by elnawawi
tomiotar wrote:I would suggest lightning for pve and blue for pvp because against a good defence (player defence) the bird damage is too low, but it can be usefull against mobs that have lower defence and maybe save 1 arrow.




if going with attack rate for pvp and your opponent has high parry it will null the damage and makes the blue hawk useless... right? so if using increase physical its a positive damage? correct me if im wrong.....


Both are right

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:06 am
by glavie
xMoDx wrote:if going with attack rate for pvp and your opponent has high parry it will null the damage and makes the blue hawk useless... right? so if using increase physical its a positive damage? correct me if im wrong.....


If your opponent has high parry it will just balance things. Its not useless, you will still hit harder more often then if you werent using any bird.

Anyone have the lighting bird?

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:15 am
by lynette
hmmm, i think attk rating will be much better for pvp,
whereas when farming, use the phy damage hawk.

Main reason i think that the phy damage dealt on human players is not going to be significant , there will be damage, but not significant
compared to when you use attk rating, there is higher chances for u to do your max range of damage ( is there higher chance to deal status too? i m not sure, but it seems does, need confirmation though) , and , that, is significant damage.

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 6:27 am
by tomiotar
glavie wrote:
xMoDx wrote:if going with attack rate for pvp and your opponent has high parry it will null the damage and makes the blue hawk useless... right? so if using increase physical its a positive damage? correct me if im wrong.....


If your opponent has high parry it will just balance things. Its not useless, you will still hit harder more often then if you werent using any bird.

Anyone have the lighting bird?



I dont have it but Ive fought people that have it and it did on me like 100 dmg and didnt hit really often :roll: .

Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 7:53 am
by lynette
ya....thats y i think attk rating is better from what i stated above