Silkroad Online Forums

I hav a rouge and I dont really like it that much. I know they get a lot better a lvl 40 but I think a warrior would be more fun and better. Plz leave reason for your choice.

2handed warrior ftw XD
Good Dmg but lower than rogue .....
Has knockdown , knockback and stun ....
Looks awesome

Great Defense (has iron (+700 phy def.) and mana (+1k mag def.)
skin buffs (last for 45 seconds) ... [You mix it with bless and you
got 1.30 seconds of god mode and chain again after 30 seconds)

Can kill everything in pvp

Take 2h warrior because you cant even spell Rogue.

then would warrior be good for a hunter?

mike456 wrote:then would warrior be good for a hunter?

They look good

@akuji ... is that name from psx game ... Akuji The Heartless?

akuji^ wrote:Take 2h warrior because you cant even spell Rogue.

i agree lol

what about s/s warrior with warlock sub

s/s warrior u shuld forget it its really hard to play.i got a lvl 23 s/s warrior im fightning crabs it took me 3 hits to kill those crabs normal ones. slash , shield crush,stab. i did these to kill every monster. i saw 2 handed warrior 2 hits them.its really sad.

u cant kill a person but u really look cool with those shield.
but u might kill rogue or wiz but rogue and wiz its depend on luck

noobert mclagg wrote:but I think a warrior would be more fun and better.

u think? cause i dont think so

akuji^ wrote:Take 2h warrior because you cant even spell Rogue.

hahahahaa
go warrior coolest euro char*_* armor rox

warrior ftw

s/s is really hard to play but with warlock debuffs wouldnt it make it easier to kill

noobert mclagg wrote:s/s is really hard to play but with warlock debuffs wouldnt it make it easier to kill

wo ho ho, where did you get that idea??
lol

*cough*VforVendetta*cough*

^ because V invented the Warrior/Warlock -_-

OT: imo 2H warrior isn't that exciting, you might as well go be a Glaiver and skip the pot delay, so with axes or 1H(greatest tank)

akuji^ wrote:Take 2h warrior because you cant even spell Rogue.

Hypocrisy much?

XemnasXD wrote:^ because V invented the Warrior/Warlock -_-

OT: imo 2H warrior isn't that exciting, you might as well go be a Glaiver and skip the pot delay, so with axes or 1H(greatest tank)

Axes sux at tanking ... and did you even play 2H?

im going to try a 1h/cleric, in theory it should be an excelent support/tank build. good for uniques, and tanking is such a good feeling

as I was looking at the 1h sword moves and one said you can use this skill while the person is kd. So does 1h sword hav a kd move because I didnt see one on there.

1h hasn't got kd skill

only the 2h skills have it

XemnasXD wrote:^ because V invented the Warrior/Warlock -_-

OT: imo 2H warrior isn't that exciting, you might as well go be a Glaiver and skip the pot delay, so with axes or 1H(greatest tank)

+1 pot delay can get annoying

but 2H does look nice, 2hand sword looks good

and you will almost always be accepted into parties since you are a tanker (provided that you do your job)

Nitrozz wrote:

XemnasXD wrote:^ because V invented the Warrior/Warlock -_-

OT: imo 2H warrior isn't that exciting, you might as well go be a Glaiver and skip the pot delay, so with axes or 1H(greatest tank)

Axes sux at tanking ... and did you even play 2H?

actually i have so take a minute and feel stupid....



done yet?


anyway i was calling 1H the greatest tank not axes and it is so that not even debatable, good forbid 1H warrior has a warlock or Cleric sub then your in for a fight.....And i like the way axes reminded me of my rogue + those axe moves look amazing so IMO (in case you missed it the first time) Axes or 1H warrior would be more fun to play.....

thanks guys I think im going 1h warrior/warlock