Page 1 of 1
Warrior is not for Rogue!
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:00 pm
by zeldazoo22
Ok, let me EXPLAIN! Most people will get all the skills in Rogue to start I presume, or at least thats what I'm doing, and therefore leaves the mwith two weapons. The Crossbow for range and the daggers for melee. Now, WHY on earth would someone choose warrior as a sub-class? That leaves you with three weapons! Now, all your dagger skills were a waste!
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:15 pm
by pengachu
unless they decide only to get the buffs...but i also find it confusing and not making any sense
Re: Warrior is not for Rogue!
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:16 pm
by Biscuit
zeldazoo22 wrote:[...]
Now, WHY on earth would someone choose warrior as a sub-class?
[...]
Because you might have a hard time getting and keeping monsters attention if you try to tank with a rogue.
Re: Warrior is not for Rogue!
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:26 pm
by Vandall
Biscuit wrote:zeldazoo22 wrote:[...]
Now, WHY on earth would someone choose warrior as a sub-class?
[...]
Because you might have a hard time getting and keeping monsters attention if you try to tank with a rogue.
+1
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:34 pm
by zeldazoo22
Theres plenty of monsters to kill so I don't think I need to be warried about that. If I shoot the guy with a crossbow, they run too me but oops! I turn invisible...now, I stab them with posion dagger....DEAD. What have u got to say to that?! huh? huh?
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:45 pm
by LAki
I think he was talking about your role in the party.
You cant pull monsters, then turn invisible and let the monsters you pulled kill rest of the party.
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:58 pm
by Biscuit
zeldazoo22 wrote:Theres plenty of monsters to kill so I don't think I need to be warried about that. If I shoot the guy with a crossbow, they run too me but oops! I turn invisible...now, I stab them with posion dagger....DEAD. What have u got to say to that?! huh? huh?
Have you actually
tried that strategy?