Page 1 of 1
KB or Stun?
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:24 pm
by shadowman20875
Im wondering y everyone uses stun first instead of KB? i mean KB crit is great and its 35% rather than 20%. yes stun lets u get a 'free' attck but kb is so much faster. Also u can negate the opponents stun/kd (not a typo, kd) or even chain or nuke
So y do ppl use stun 1st instead of KB?
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 12:50 am
by Kuribo
some people use kb first and no stun... i think is depend on the moment.
if ur oponent is casting nuke (or another skills with time to cast) already, kb... if not, stun.
why would be useful kb if ur oponent is not atacking u?
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 1:02 am
by Xeroist
I would use stun-mars-kb-switch-repeat.
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:41 am
by zephyr
mars has a huge post-use delay. if you use mars first and then stun, you opponent will just pot up to full health.
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:47 am
by Ell
Also truth and soul have more than 20% chance to stun.
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 5:22 am
by flexo
well i know it's diffrent because i'm a pure int.. but i always use kb first... especially against bladers.. cause if they ain't near you .. they can't kd you..
so i do nuke, kb, nuke, stun..
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:02 am
by zephyr
just dont forget that there are 2 books of knockback
