this is my idea for pacific... seriously dont copy ... i was thinking of somwthing truly original... maybe a 2:1 strength nuker.... or a blader thats main is that long distance sword force thing... just a thought... i like the first one the most... its opposite of everyone else but would be more hearty rather then easily breakable... even though it sacrifices a stronger attack it may lay long enough to win... (either that or a 70:70 nuker build)
thoughts comments?
some odd new builds... just some thoughts
-
Noodlesareyummy
- Regular Member
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:56 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Greece
-
MastaChiefX
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:18 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Life.
-
IguanaRampage
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:37 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Changing
nukes are based on INT. A strength-based nuker would do next to no damage. If you want to go strength, use weapon skills. If you want to go INT, use a combination of nukes and weapon skills.
McCain, he (Barack Obama) said, will soon "be accusing me of being a secret communist because I shared my toys in kindergarten."
bowner wrote:what does that mean lol ... well if it does suk can i get some pros and cons so i can make a more educated guess on whether to try or not try this build?
also.....i just want an original build so help me out eh?
dont bother trying to do this. a str hybrid nuker is not a good build. the nukes will hardly do damage, and it wont be able to tank. any kind of str hybrid isnt really worth your time.
nowadays you really cant come up with a new build thatll be strong. theres just too many people playing the game.
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>
i have reached brilliance...no 1 hardly ever does the ice nuke ne more right? how about 5:1 or something like that (int) and use fire and ice
why fire and ice you might ask... well ice for the slowing or freezing nuke, fire bicheon for filling attacks and fire nuke. tell me if ne good (pros and cons) or i might just go full int bicheon nuker(fire) (and ice)
why fire and ice you might ask... well ice for the slowing or freezing nuke, fire bicheon for filling attacks and fire nuke. tell me if ne good (pros and cons) or i might just go full int bicheon nuker(fire) (and ice)
-
Mr_Pubes
- Common Member
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:31 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Lurking
bowner wrote:i have reached brilliance...no 1 hardly ever does the ice nuke ne more right? how about 5:1 or something like that (int) and use fire and ice
why fire and ice you might ask... well ice for the slowing or freezing nuke, fire bicheon for filling attacks and fire nuke. tell me if ne good (pros and cons) or i might just go full int bicheon nuker(fire) (and ice)
Immunity towards ice. Meaning ice will not freeze or cause status ailments. This is due to the alchemy. Fire on the other hand is pretty good.
Spoiler!
bowner wrote:i have reached brilliance...no 1 hardly ever does the ice nuke ne more right? how about 5:1 or something like that (int) and use fire and ice
why fire and ice you might ask... well ice for the slowing or freezing nuke, fire bicheon for filling attacks and fire nuke. tell me if ne good (pros and cons) or i might just go full int bicheon nuker(fire) (and ice)
as a nuker u need light for magical damage increase and speed certainly does help run since u dont tank
<<banned from SRF for bot supporting. -SG>>
takolin wrote:Ice771x wrote:lol thatd be an awful build. why get 69 pacheon AND 69 bicheon
im assuming it was sarcasm
69 pacheon => maxed AR+ bow skills for PvE.
69 bicheon => KD/stab for PvP.
No sarcasm.
69 masteries is kind of a lot to spend just for a little bit of an upgrade on damage. and you said 72 for bicheon.
itd make more sense to put sp into spear to get the hp passive. plus what weapon would this player use? itd cose way too much sp to do both, and one wouldnt be high enough to do as much damage as someone the same lvl with a normal build.
im not tryin to shoot your idea down. im just givin some constructive criticism and tryin to get a better idea of what youre trying to accomplish with this char
<<banned from SRF for bot admission. -SG>>
-
MastaChiefX
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:18 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Life.
-
Fat_Smurf
- Elite Member
- Posts: 5887
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:57 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: www.youporn.com
Ice771x wrote:takolin wrote:Ice771x wrote:lol thatd be an awful build. why get 69 pacheon AND 69 bicheon
im assuming it was sarcasm
69 pacheon => maxed AR+ bow skills for PvE.
69 bicheon => KD/stab for PvP.
No sarcasm.
69 masteries is kind of a lot to spend just for a little bit of an upgrade on damage. and you said 72 for bicheon.
itd make more sense to put sp into spear to get the hp passive. plus what weapon would this player use? itd cose way too much sp to do both, and one wouldnt be high enough to do as much damage as someone the same lvl with a normal build.
im not tryin to shoot your idea down. im just givin some constructive criticism and tryin to get a better idea of what youre trying to accomplish with this char
The 69 in Pacheon is for devil arrow in PvE.
The 69 minimum bicheon is for KD+double stab in PvP.
The 69 in light is for buffs.
Fire is for damage.
But then there's 3 more points to spend.
A full int won't suffer much damage if he doesn't upgrade his weapon tree.
But farming will be a b*tch.
