Page 1 of 1

Id apreciate some help in here, prot or garms?

Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 12:38 am
by IceCrash
Hey, im a 95 mag bal s/s.. a guildmate of mine is high lvl , hes hybrid and he completely owns.. he used garms all the way till 75 xD, so , im lvl 55 and i dont have any armor/prot 7th degree cause i want to change to garms.. but stil, i dunno if its the best thing. Coment plz

Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 1:32 am
by oktaytheazer
u know garment and pro bonuses ? choise is urs. i personaly think garment saves u money !! garment ftw !! and + to that u get moving bonuse how cool is dat ?!

Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 12:25 pm
by Waisha
Use armor in pvp for all int based chars imo.
Im doing an int hybrid. Ill use protector from lvl 1 - 52 and then ill change to armor.
A int char with garms is the same thing like 1 shot by glaivers.

Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 2:06 pm
by IceCrash
lol, im a hybrid dude-95 mag bal, so this means glaviers arent my prob now, nukers are lol ^^

Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 3:41 pm
by takolin
W3GAN wrote:Use armor in pvp for all int based chars imo.
Im doing an int hybrid. Ill use protector from lvl 1 - 52 and then ill change to armor.
A int char with garms is the same thing like 1 shot by glaivers.


An int in garms has a better survivability vs a glaiver as an int int armour vs an int.
I've seen int in garms own glaivers without ice buff (they went for heuksal passive).

Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:09 pm
by Priam
takolin wrote:
W3GAN wrote:Use armor in pvp for all int based chars imo.
Im doing an int hybrid. Ill use protector from lvl 1 - 52 and then ill change to armor.
A int char with garms is the same thing like 1 shot by glaivers.


An int in garms has a better survivability vs a glaiver as an int int armour vs an int.
I've seen int in garms own glaivers without ice buff (they went for heuksal passive).


shit happens, but the survivability thing? not true

Glaviers are phys, armor has the most phys defense, so think logically now, what would be better vs a glavier, armor with the best phys deff, or garms with the best mag deff?

Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 7:38 pm
by Waisha
Priam wrote:
takolin wrote:
W3GAN wrote:Use armor in pvp for all int based chars imo.
Im doing an int hybrid. Ill use protector from lvl 1 - 52 and then ill change to armor.
A int char with garms is the same thing like 1 shot by glaivers.


An int in garms has a better survivability vs a glaiver as an int int armour vs an int.
I've seen int in garms own glaivers without ice buff (they went for heuksal passive).


shit happens, but the survivability thing? not true

Glaviers are phys, armor has the most phys defense, so think logically now, what would be better vs a glavier, armor with the best phys deff, or garms with the best mag deff?


Lol, just dont mind him.
Im sure hes right.

Who doesnt know a pure int spear shall wear garms? >_>

1203213th time ive said it but here i go again:
Ppl who guess what skills/armor to use shall read Not post.

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:57 am
by takolin
Priam wrote:
takolin wrote:
W3GAN wrote:Use armor in pvp for all int based chars imo.
Im doing an int hybrid. Ill use protector from lvl 1 - 52 and then ill change to armor.
A int char with garms is the same thing like 1 shot by glaivers.


An int in garms has a better survivability vs a glaiver as an int int armour vs an int.
I've seen int in garms own glaivers without ice buff (they went for heuksal passive).


shit happens, but the survivability thing? not true

Glaviers are phys, armor has the most phys defense, so think logically now, what would be better vs a glavier, armor with the best phys deff, or garms with the best mag deff?


True, but what to to wear vs an other nuker.
Nuker in armour vs nuker in garms with same equips = Victory for the one in garms, but an int in garms can win to a glaiver.
You could carry 2 sets, but in wars it would be quite annoying to switch often.

Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:53 pm
by IguanaRampage
Priam wrote:
takolin wrote:
W3GAN wrote:Use armor in pvp for all int based chars imo.
Im doing an int hybrid. Ill use protector from lvl 1 - 52 and then ill change to armor.
A int char with garms is the same thing like 1 shot by glaivers.


An int in garms has a better survivability vs a glaiver as an int int armour vs an int.
I've seen int in garms own glaivers without ice buff (they went for heuksal passive).


shit happens, but the survivability thing? not true

Glaviers are phys, armor has the most phys defense, so think logically now, what would be better vs a glavier, armor with the best phys deff, or garms with the best mag deff?

True, but I've also seen S/S ints in garms 1 or 2 hit S/S ints in armor :wink: