Which would be more "intresting"?
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 4:10 am
Which would be more fun...this will be just for fun so survivability isn't a real factor. Only those two or maybe some sort of dual wield build, int of course.
Silkroad Online Forums
Free Forums for Silkroad Online players.
https://dev.silkroadforums.com/
Which would be more "intresting"?
Page 1 of 1
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 4:27 am
int... get ice for snow shield, or you'll die horribly. So it'd be pach ice light, or pach ice fire, or fire and light mixed...
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:53 am
pach/light/COLD
as an int pach you will need snow shield.
as an int pach you will need snow shield.
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 5:37 pm
Pach, light and fire kicks ass when you pass 40... WHy is it a must with snowshield? He wont die unless he shitalks to people or go pvp vs str or hybrid chars. ~.~
Pve is no problem, with light and fire you kill everything before it reaches you. With this build you have more firepower han you need. And distance will be the key. A gig is an easy kill. Pt mobs require more planning.. with kb, stun and shit it wont be a problem.
Snowshield is overrated and a waste of sp when it comes to pve.
And if the guy dont bot or aint a complete idiot, this will go fine.
Never tried the force build tought...
Pve is no problem, with light and fire you kill everything before it reaches you. With this build you have more firepower han you need. And distance will be the key. A gig is an easy kill. Pt mobs require more planning.. with kb, stun and shit it wont be a problem.
Snowshield is overrated and a waste of sp when it comes to pve.
And if the guy dont bot or aint a complete idiot, this will go fine.
Never tried the force build tought...
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:54 pm
Force makes everything interesting.
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:03 pm
omier44 wrote:Force makes everything interesting.
Cleric > Force.
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:22 am
Cleric is not INTERESTING... at all.
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 8:30 am
omier44 wrote:Cleric is not INTERESTING... at all.
Objection....
Cleric is very interesting, at least for me. I love playing cleric in euro pts, it's one of the more challenging tasks in the pt. Also in group pvp it's a very nice and essential build too. A good cleric is very important in pt pvp.
Just because it's not interesting for you, it doesn't mean that it's not interesting for other people either.
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:34 pm
Well, yea it is interesting in pt, but not in general imo.
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:06 pm
neither would be more fun, youd die before you could do anything
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 6:58 pm
UnbeatableDevil wrote:neither would be more fun, youd die before you could do anything
That is, if u don't know what to do.
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:24 pm
A int bow with no cold is pretty much a wizard/bard with less dmg and no pot delay
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2011 8:34 am
PACH/COLD/LIGHT
Since pacheon dosnt give you that much def, both light and cold are important. You need ice for snow shield, iceberg wall, ice rain, frost nova and the imbue and you need light for the grass and ghost walk and ofc the nukes.
Fire would prolly increase your DMG but what you need is defence.
And a good bow.
Cold imbue makes the pain go away.
Since pacheon dosnt give you that much def, both light and cold are important. You need ice for snow shield, iceberg wall, ice rain, frost nova and the imbue and you need light for the grass and ghost walk and ofc the nukes.
Fire would prolly increase your DMG but what you need is defence.
And a good bow.
Cold imbue makes the pain go away.
Spoiler!