Which would be more "intresting"?
Which would be more "intresting"?
Which would be more fun...this will be just for fun so survivability isn't a real factor. Only those two or maybe some sort of dual wield build, int of course.
-
futuresight
- Regular Member
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:53 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: some Pserver
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
int... get ice for snow shield, or you'll die horribly. So it'd be pach ice light, or pach ice fire, or fire and light mixed...
-
CloneZ
- New Member
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 12:49 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Beyond hell, above heaven and then two houses to the left.
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
Pach, light and fire kicks ass when you pass 40... WHy is it a must with snowshield? He wont die unless he shitalks to people or go pvp vs str or hybrid chars. ~.~
Pve is no problem, with light and fire you kill everything before it reaches you. With this build you have more firepower han you need. And distance will be the key. A gig is an easy kill. Pt mobs require more planning.. with kb, stun and shit it wont be a problem.
Snowshield is overrated and a waste of sp when it comes to pve.
And if the guy dont bot or aint a complete idiot, this will go fine.
Never tried the force build tought...
Pve is no problem, with light and fire you kill everything before it reaches you. With this build you have more firepower han you need. And distance will be the key. A gig is an easy kill. Pt mobs require more planning.. with kb, stun and shit it wont be a problem.
Snowshield is overrated and a waste of sp when it comes to pve.
And if the guy dont bot or aint a complete idiot, this will go fine.
Never tried the force build tought...
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
omier44 wrote:Force makes everything interesting.
Cleric > Force.
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
omier44 wrote:Cleric is not INTERESTING... at all.
Objection....
Cleric is very interesting, at least for me. I love playing cleric in euro pts, it's one of the more challenging tasks in the pt. Also in group pvp it's a very nice and essential build too. A good cleric is very important in pt pvp.
Just because it's not interesting for you, it doesn't mean that it's not interesting for other people either.
-
TheDrop
- Forum Legend
- Posts: 7150
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 1:37 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: uefa2012
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
neither would be more fun, youd die before you could do anything
let it gooooo let it gooooOoOooOOOOOO
Let her suck my pistol
She open up her mouth and then I blow her brains out
Let her suck my pistol
She open up her mouth and then I blow her brains out
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
UnbeatableDevil wrote:neither would be more fun, youd die before you could do anything
That is, if u don't know what to do.
-
TheDrop
- Forum Legend
- Posts: 7150
- Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 1:37 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: uefa2012
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
A int bow with no cold is pretty much a wizard/bard with less dmg and no pot delay
let it gooooo let it gooooOoOooOOOOOO
Let her suck my pistol
She open up her mouth and then I blow her brains out
Let her suck my pistol
She open up her mouth and then I blow her brains out
Re: Which would be more "intresting"?
PACH/COLD/LIGHT
Since pacheon dosnt give you that much def, both light and cold are important. You need ice for snow shield, iceberg wall, ice rain, frost nova and the imbue and you need light for the grass and ghost walk and ofc the nukes.
Fire would prolly increase your DMG but what you need is defence.
And a good bow.
Cold imbue makes the pain go away.
Since pacheon dosnt give you that much def, both light and cold are important. You need ice for snow shield, iceberg wall, ice rain, frost nova and the imbue and you need light for the grass and ghost walk and ofc the nukes.
Fire would prolly increase your DMG but what you need is defence.
And a good bow.
Cold imbue makes the pain go away.
Spoiler!
