Page 1 of 1

Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 6:17 pm
by Wilkroad
Goodday to all readers,

Warrior vs. Rogue: I have a problem, i can not dicide between a Warrior and a Rogue (both cleric as sub)

It may sound as same old same, but I am hoping that some one wil stil answer to this.
I am farming a char atm, pure str, going for 2 mill sp, got 700k atm.

Rogue: I got one atm but only with crossbow skills and bard as sub.
warrior: I have never played this one before, seems like a much more expanded character than a rogue.
I have read multiple guides of both chars, but still cant make the deccision
I am scared of the fact that I wil get really really bored playing a rogue al the way up to lvl 100 (110). Since a warrior has 3 different weapons and also a job in a party, makes me wonder if I should take it or not.


I hope I made everything clear, questions are always welcome.
Don't treat me like a noob, because I am not xD just need some one to tell me that I really need to take one of the two :P

thank you reading this!!!!

Wilkroad

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:21 pm
by Devilman
Warrior/Rogue... 5 weapons, awesome pvp, and in a party you never use cleric sub anyways.

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:29 pm
by Wilkroad
Never really thought of that xD
thank you very much, any other people who would like to give advice?

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:26 am
by adhdtje
Devilman wrote:Warrior/Rogue... 5 weapons, awesome pvp, and in a party you never use cleric sub anyways.



+1 this way you can take the best of both builds

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 5:21 pm
by Devilman
Wilkroad wrote:Never really thought of that xD
thank you very much, any other people who would like to give advice?

if you decide on that build, this guide is the best there is http://www.silkroadforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=119392

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:30 pm
by inmobile
warrior/cleric- pvp////////////////// rogue/cleric - pvp/pve

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:43 pm
by Wilkroad
TY TY TY,

im going to read the guide and see what I think of it,

thank you so much for replying (dunno how to spell that word:P)

wilkroad

EDIT:

w00t im taking it Warrior/rogue, just gets the most out of a pure str.
if you take another sub it will always be a INT based one, so thats why i chose it.

ty for the advice@@

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 5:36 pm
by Devilman
Wilkroad wrote:TY TY TY,

im going to read the guide and see what I think of it,

thank you so much for replying (dunno how to spell that word:P)

wilkroad

EDIT:

w00t im taking it Warrior/rogue, just gets the most out of a pure str.
if you take another sub it will always be a INT based one, so thats why i chose it.

ty for the advice@@

Good luck :sohappy:

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 2:19 pm
by karimgh
Yes, i am lvl 35 rogue/warrior. 1 hit i kill ongs/2 hit i kill huns !! 3 hit i kill pt mobs!!

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 6:08 am
by Dbett5
i hope you havnt already made that because thats not true about no clericing in partys at level 40 you get rd and u dont need to have your rod on to use it and its rlly a great skill and ressing people and clericing when needed and blessing helps i wudnt go a warrior rogue there boring and partys wont want you

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 9:15 am
by Devilman
Dbett5 wrote:i hope you havnt already made that because thats not true about no clericing in partys at level 40 you get rd and u dont need to have your rod on to use it and its rlly a great skill and ressing people and clericing when needed and blessing helps i wudnt go a warrior rogue there boring and partys wont want you

A warrior is always needed in a party... and please explain the boring part, im interested :roll:

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:17 am
by Dbett5
yeah a warrior is needed but they dont do much better then a rouge an do.. except rouges do as much damage as a wizard at lvl 40

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 11:29 am
by Devilman
A warrior is a tank. Learn some party play before you start talking nonsense please ;)

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:10 pm
by panterr
Ever seen a rogue making Fences, pain?
Have enough hp to tank?
And yeah, you go tank with your CE on, have fun.

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:19 am
by Ownage
I did a lot of pt play on tsro and Warriors are always needed, atleast 1, usually 2. Also if your a good rogue you will be in need too because I noticed Rogue's lured very well if they were good enough, and they do dmg.

Re: Warrior vs. Rogue

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:46 am
by OrangeFeffy
Dbett5 wrote:i hope you havnt already made that because thats not true about no clericing in partys at level 40 you get rd and u dont need to have your rod on to use it and its rlly a great skill and ressing people and clericing when needed and blessing helps i wudnt go a warrior rogue there boring and partys wont want you

fail.. there are ALWAYS clerics in a party. multiple at times really. so unless the squad is fail and everyone but you dies then being a cleric is needed. MORE FAIL, warrior rogue is a really fun and challenging build and any str char that can tank or damage deal is wanted. its called being versatile.