Page 1 of 1
wizard/bard or bard/cleric
Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 10:41 am
by becquaert
I'm now farming at the ongs and first I was going to make a wizard/bard for the speed and u can't get killed by aggresive mobs and party's and giant because the noise

but now I read other topics and they say you will get killed easy with bard and u can beter take cleric as sub??

if thats true than I gonna make a battle bard/cleric. because most of the times when I join a LTP there is always 1 wizard in it probably boting in cave and they die a lot with cleric as sub!
Re: wizard/bard or bard/cleric
Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 11:36 am
by Vinyl
A bard/cleric is too dependent on a party, but once in a party, you shine like the sun. in group pvp, your a master healer too.
a wizard/bard just has extra speed and noise and no def. buffs so basically, on a party mob or giant, your gonna die. if a champion crits you, your gonna die. but that's just solo. in a group, youll be fine and in jobbing the speed is beneficial. but there aren't 24/7 groups. so decide what you wanna do.
Re: wizard/bard or bard/cleric
Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 12:43 pm
by Nitro
If you're making Wizard as your primary and only character, sub Cleric is a must ...
Bard is for screwing around and using it for powerleveling etc.
Re: wizard/bard or bard/cleric
Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 6:38 pm
by dutchleader
Vinyl wrote:A bard/cleric is too dependent on a party, but once in a party, you shine like the sun. in group pvp, your a master healer too.
a wizard/bard just has extra speed and noise and no def. buffs so basically, on a party mob or giant, your gonna die. if a champion crits you, your gonna die. but that's just solo. in a group, youll be fine and in jobbing the speed is beneficial. but there aren't 24/7 groups. so decide what you wanna do.
I disagree here. First off all a bard/cleric doesnt shine in a party. It makes other builds shine. In particular wizards. Full buffed wizzys with LT are beasts.
When you have wiz / bard ( which I would choose) you can have 2 different roles in partys. A dmging role and a supporting role. Battle barding is fun and so is wizzing in group pvp. Cleric/bard is just really passive in my opinion. Also dont think about soloing to much, you are a europe go grouping ;D. Seriously all pure int europes sxck in group pvp when they are not in a party. As for solo lvling wiz/bard does a really good job. Just take a wolf with you for the giants.
Re: wizard/bard or bard/cleric
Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 6:39 pm
by Brago
I'm now farming at the ongs and first I was going to make a wizard/bard for the speed and u can't get killed by aggresive mobs and party's and because the noi[b]giantse but now I read other topics and they say you will get killed easy with bard and u can beter take cleric as sub?? if thats true than I gonna make a battle bard/cleric. because most of the times when I join a LTP there is always 1 wizard in it probably boting in cave and they die a lot with cleric as sub!
Noise doesnt save you from giants/champs
Re: wizard/bard or bard/cleric
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 4:42 pm
by becquaert
oky ty people...
for the helpfull information

Re: wizard/bard or bard/cleric
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 8:31 am
by Kori0129
becquaert wrote:oky ty people...
for the helpfull information

and now ? You will go 70:70 warlock/warrior ? Or what?

Re: wizard/bard or bard/cleric
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 6:10 pm
by becquaert
nah xD onMaybe I will stay playing my lvl67 69%_70% char or on my wizard/cleric lvl26(still farming at ongs) because I need the same sp for the 2builds(only the skills I want) to lvl91 so I don't know what to choose
