Page 1 of 1
Prot or Garms..?
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:24 pm
by xKingpinx
So as a hybrid int s/s ...was it a good idea switching to prot from garms? or should i have stayed garms?
Re: Prot or Garms..?
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:28 pm
by Bop
xKingpinx wrote:So as a hybrid int s/s ...was it a good idea switching to prot from garms? or should i have stayed garms?
depends how heavy hybrid u are...and gear doesnt really matter...prot is a good mid line...for any oppositional builds.
Re: Prot or Garms..?
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:33 pm
by xKingpinx
Well with full blue decent gear...mostly str and int 5/6 i think one peice is like str 4.. and int 4 on my shield and sword..but my balance without prem is about 74% phys and 98% mag...so i guess you could say im heavy hybrid also i will try and make some pvp videos at 90 just to show how hybrids do and everything..
Re: Prot or Garms..?
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:35 pm
by Bop
xKingpinx wrote:Well with full blue decent gear...mostly str and int 5/6 i think one peice is like str 4.. and int 4 on my shield and sword..but my balance without prem is about 74% phys and 98% mag...so i guess you could say im heavy hybrid also i will try and make some pvp videos at 90 just to show how hybrids do and everything..
so im guessing ur about 82%~ naked mag bal? u can wear w/e u feel best..wearing armor will give u harder time against wiz and such and garms would give u a tough time against warriors...like said...prot would be a good midline...
Re: Prot or Garms..?
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:36 pm
by xKingpinx
Bop wrote:xKingpinx wrote:Well with full blue decent gear...mostly str and int 5/6 i think one peice is like str 4.. and int 4 on my shield and sword..but my balance without prem is about 74% phys and 98% mag...so i guess you could say im heavy hybrid also i will try and make some pvp videos at 90 just to show how hybrids do and everything..
so im guessing ur about 82%~ naked mag bal? u can wear w/e u feel best..wearing armor will give u harder time against wiz and such and garms would give u a tough time against warriors...like said...prot would be a good midline...
k thx

Re: Prot or Garms..?
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:49 pm
by Amro
cold 90? -> garm
cold 60? -> prot
Re: Prot or Garms..?
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 6:52 pm
by Bop
Amro wrote:cold 90? -> garm
cold 60? -> prot
based on his rev profile..he has fire to atleast 77...
Re: Prot or Garms..?
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:27 pm
by xKingpinx
Bop wrote:Amro wrote:cold 90? -> garm
cold 60? -> prot
based on his rev profile..he has fire to atleast 77...
yea im cold 60 light 60 and fire/bicheon 90
Re: Prot or Garms..?
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:29 pm
by Bop
xKingpinx wrote:Bop wrote:Amro wrote:cold 90? -> garm
cold 60? -> prot
based on his rev profile..he has fire to atleast 77...
yea im cold 60 light 60 and fire/bicheon 90
good choice

...same build i would go for a hybrid nuker
Re: Prot or Garms..?
Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 11:02 pm
by TillTheEnd
All Chinese str: Protector
All Chinese Int: Protector or amor
Why protector for str?
you will do better in pvp against:
A: Glaviers
B: Bowers
C: Bladers
D: Rogue
E: Warriors
If Garms
A: s/s nuker
B: int heuksal
C??
D??
E??
F??
I don't know about you all but if you count all the glaviers/bowers/bladers/rogue/warriors in the server I can assure you there will be more then the combine total of int heuksal or s/s
Prot set +5, Jewels +6, + Snow shield+ purification pills spam and vigors if you want = win vs s/s or int spear