Has nobody thought of this?
- Blindfire
- Site Contributor
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 9:36 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: ...
Has nobody thought of this?
Why aren't people taking Bicheon to 30 for the br increase from the passive? Paired with a shield with a good blocking ratio Daredevil and Knockdown would hit less thus increasing a person's survivability. Yeah snowshield reduces damage but a block stops it.
- The Furious Ninja
- Valued Member
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:25 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Phoenix
Re: Has nobody thought of this?
some 3 element nukers do
Joymax puts the F U back in fun
42 Warrior /Warlock- FuriousNinja
I can't really call it grinding, more like tanking for gold bots.
Raamroc "So many people to kill so little time"
Xao "But you're immortal"
Raamroc "So much time"
42 Warrior /Warlock- FuriousNinja
I can't really call it grinding, more like tanking for gold bots.
Raamroc "So many people to kill so little time"
Xao "But you're immortal"
Raamroc "So much time"
- raphaell666
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 4:59 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Anywhere.
Re: Has nobody thought of this?
It's only 4% though, but do as you wish. And blocking depends on luck where snow shield does not.
<< banned for remaking a banned account. -cin >>
- Shadowfox542
- Active Member
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:16 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Olympus
Re: Has nobody thought of this?
You get hit 100 times. For 100 damage each, makes math mad easy.
Br 18 shield+4 passive=7800 damage done to you.
Snow Shield (lv20, again to make math easy =D) 20%.
Total damage=8000
Yes, snow shield is timed, but you can still attack (for the most part) when you use it. Unlike shield if your not s/s, and if you are s/s it should be 90.
Sorry for the mathfail, no excuses >.<
Br 18 shield+4 passive=7800 damage done to you.
Snow Shield (lv20, again to make math easy =D) 20%.
Total damage=8000
Yes, snow shield is timed, but you can still attack (for the most part) when you use it. Unlike shield if your not s/s, and if you are s/s it should be 90.
Sorry for the mathfail, no excuses >.<
Last edited by Shadowfox542 on Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
- wolfster
- Casual Member
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: VIP ecSRO
Re: Has nobody thought of this?
Shadowfox542 wrote:You get hit 100 times. For 100 damage each, makes math mad easy.
Br 18 shield+4 passive=8800 damage done to you.
Snow Shield (lv20, again to make math easy =D) 20%.
Total damage=8000
Yes, snow shield is timed, but you can still attack (for the most part) when you use it. Unlike shield if your not s/s, and if you are s/s it should be 90.
10000 - 2200 = 7800
Re: Has nobody thought of this?
wolfster wrote:Shadowfox542 wrote:You get hit 100 times. For 100 damage each, makes math mad easy.
Br 18 shield+4 passive=8800 damage done to you.
Snow Shield (lv20, again to make math easy =D) 20%.
Total damage=8000
Yes, snow shield is timed, but you can still attack (for the most part) when you use it. Unlike shield if your not s/s, and if you are s/s it should be 90.
10000 - 2200 = 7800
lol @ math
OT: block > absorb; but the thing is block doesnt always work while snowshield will always reduce the damage. also that br 18+4 passive example, its like saying you will block a daredevil 22 times out of 100 if the warrior were to hit you 100 times. that is pretty bad rate lol. fortunately it doesnt work that way. its a 22% chance to block. so it could block the 1st hit or never block any of the next 100 hit. May be you have noticed sometimes a block 10 shield would block more than a block 14 or 15 shield.
- Bobby
- Active Member
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:43 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Australia
Re: Has nobody thought of this?
well i'd much rather get a low snow shield than 4% block passive. If u get get snow shield, u still get to use a shield (no passive) , getting passive means u lose snow shield.
Wish the best for raphaell666


- OTG
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1060
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 6:15 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Off Topic
Re: Has nobody thought of this?
I believe at level 30 you have the first knockdown. Glaviers can equip themselves with a balde or sword and knockdown a warrior or use the Iron Shield. Which will probably increase your phy def by like 50 phy def + whatever your shield def is.
Re: Has nobody thought of this?
OTG wrote:I believe at level 30 you have the first knockdown. Glaviers can equip themselves with a balde or sword and knockdown a warrior or use the Iron Shield. Which will probably increase your phy def by like 50 phy def + whatever your shield def is.
Maybe the iron shield idea would work, but I believe that KD ratio had a correlation to the KD level, so to say the lvl 30 KD would have a 50% chance to knockdown a lvl 30 enemy, and a very low chance of knocking down a 8d-9d opponent.

- _Dutchy_
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:57 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Has nobody thought of this?
OTG wrote:I believe at level 30 you have the first knockdown. Glaviers can equip themselves with a balde or sword and knockdown a warrior or use the Iron Shield. Which will probably increase your phy def by like 50 phy def + whatever your shield def is.
having that only lasts 15 seconds.
while snowshield lasts almost what 1-2 mins ? i rather have the snowshield then and using firewall.
i have yet to meet a warrior that can kill me or can kill me easly
the KD would be a decent ideea but sometimes you won't get and KD's you can't really count on them. like you can't count on the Stuns or Blocks either when you switch to shield.
- Thomas42
- Active Member
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:30 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
Re: Has nobody thought of this?
A lv30 KD would work with next to nothing efficiency, simply because it is level-based. The lv30 iron shield would be equally worthless.
OT: I would rather absorb 23% of all damage, than block 14% of all hits (100% block ratio blue on the enemy's weapon gives you br10+bicheon passive).
OT: I would rather absorb 23% of all damage, than block 14% of all hits (100% block ratio blue on the enemy's weapon gives you br10+bicheon passive).

The best way out - is through.
- Shadowfox542
- Active Member
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:16 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Olympus
Re: Has nobody thought of this?
Haha, math fail.
Also, super low level KD wouldn't work.
Also, super low level KD wouldn't work.
- Thomas42
- Active Member
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:30 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Budapest, Hungary
Re: Has nobody thought of this?
Please tell me, where did I math fail?

The best way out - is through.


