1h/lock or 2h/cleric??

[willieb3]

which is better ??

[Bop]

2 total different styles of play...if all you wanna do is rape in solo pvp then go anything xxxx/lock

[willieb3]

well like i wanna be good solo pvping jobbing and solo pve so .. yea

[RedBlueGreen]

well like i wanna be good solo pvping jobbing and solo pve so .. yea

1h/lock.. u can also get 2hand skills and play as a 2hander

[MooMooMoo]

well like i wanna be good solo pvping jobbing and solo pve so .. yea

1h/lock.. u can also get 2hand skills and play as a 2hander

yep

[Aaron777]

2h/cleric
my opinion

[Fauntleroy]

I think warrior/cleric

[!G4!]

i Say 1h/lock ^_^

[Jaapii]

You may select up to 2 options lol.
OnT: i would choose 1h/lock, cuz almost everybody already has 2h/cleric.

[OTG]

They both are good but I find it to be:

1H/Warlock - Great for 1v1 pvp vs Chinese and builds without Cleric subclass.

2H/Cleric - Great for teamplay and pvp if you know how to switch properly and heal yourself.

[XMoshe]

Go both and take axe too!

[OTG]

Go both and take axe too!

+1

Whatever sub class you take. I'd take all 3 warrior weapons to take the most advantage and fully use the build to it's max potential.

[in2ition]

2hand/cleric is nice in party and solo too
I have a +5 weapon and with 1 hit I kill mobs same level than me, I do 5000 damage without critical
at cap it will be fun when you job, on Rome if you're a 2hand/cleric you will get in many thief parties

[vanHohenheim]

1h lock is great for both pve and pvp, but its just that with holy spell its nearly impossible to properly debuff an opponent and defeating them... as almost any party you encounter has a build with cleric as a main or sub casting holy spell all the time

i'd go with 2h cleric, is more fun to play with in pvp and pve

[Bl4nk]

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=105858&start=0
wtf y did you post this twice cant you wait a day for an answer