Page 1 of 1

Warrior question

Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:00 pm
by jarjar75
Hey guys. I wanted to know of a Warrior can kill without the 2h skills. I dont like them so I only want to add dual axe and 1h skills. Will it be okey without 2h skills because I heard that dual axe against 2h is a win for the dual axe. But all the other builds are easy to kill with 2h. But would I be fine without the 2h skills and only level 1h and dual axe.

P.S I like the damm sexy dual axes!! haha

thanks :D

Re: Warrior question

Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:05 pm
by whorelock
jarjar75 wrote:Hey guys. I wanted to know of a Warrior can kill without the 2h skills. I dont like them so I only want to add dual axe and 1h skills. Will it be okey without 2h skills because I heard that dual axe against 2h is a win for the dual axe. But all the other builds are easy to kill with 2h. But would I be fine without the 2h skills and only level 1h and dual axe.

P.S I like the damm sexy dual axes!! haha

thanks :D

it all depends on ur sub class,gear,and fighting tactics

Re: Warrior question

Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:50 pm
by Grimm-.-
If you want to generalize an equal 2h vs duel axe then a duel axe will come out on top most of the time.

Re: Warrior question

Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:27 pm
by willieb3
dual axe pwns with there speed :D

Re: Warrior question

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 12:26 am
by MysticRose
I used to think

2h > Dual Axe > 1H > 2H

Am i wrong ?

PS: Those are what i thought at the 80 cap. Now i'm back to the 90 cap, so things can be a bit different :D

Re: Warrior question

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:40 am
by Grimm-.-
MysticRose wrote:I used to think

2h > Dual Axe > 1H > 2H

Am i wrong ?

PS: Those are what i thought at the 80 cap. Now i'm back to the 90 cap, so things can be a bit different :D

Yes you are wrong.
No warrior build is really dominated over the other... While 1H will usually have the most trouble killing the other two warrior builds... And probably usually wont be able to without a warlock subclass 2H and Axe are for the most part equal, So really it kinda like 1H<Axe~2H
So I guess 1H sucks anyway without warlock lol.

Re: Warrior question

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:03 am
by the_wicked
1H rapes euros. MUCH better tanking, can block a lot, ton of phys def, decent damage. It rapes wizards without getting you killed.

Re: Warrior question

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:11 am
by Grimm-.-
the_wicked wrote:1H rapes euros. MUCH better tanking, can block a lot, ton of phys def, decent damage. It rapes wizards without getting you killed.

Mmmm... I never thought about the fact that ive never even had a +1 1h. when i have a +5 axe and 2H so it probably does better then i thought.

Re: Warrior question

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:09 am
by jay0303
when i fight 1h wr i am never scared they will own me


2h does to high crit sometimes even mana shield not enough
dual axes are straight up annoying stun skills and bleed all that stuff piss me off so i be cheap and kd stab and so on

i personaly think wr tree boring

Re: Warrior question

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:06 am
by Grimm-.-
jay0303 wrote:when i fight 1h wr i am never scared they will own me


2h does to high crit sometimes even mana shield not enough
dual axes are straight up annoying stun skills and bleed all that stuff piss me off so i be cheap and kd stab and so on

i personaly think wr tree boring

Assuming by wr you meant warrior...

The warrior tree is pretty fun to play if you have all of the weapons, and a cleric subclass.
Separately... Boring