i know people say that you shouldnt use dual axes since they are weak but up to now(lvl 21) they have been quite strong
they can do as much dmg as 2H but offensive wise, are they stronger than 1H at lvl 30+
also what would be a good sub for dual axes, im thinking either bard or cleric
this is mainly for pve and soloing but will also be in parties sometimes
which one is better
- aleksandar92
- Casual Member
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 5:28 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Mercury
which one is better
-----///\\-----plz
----///-\\\----put this
---|||---|||---on your
---|||---|||---Signature if
---|||---|||---you know
----\\\-///----someone
-----\\///-----who died
------///\-----of
-----///\\\----cancer
----///-\\\----put this
---|||---|||---on your
---|||---|||---Signature if
---|||---|||---you know
----\\\-///----someone
-----\\///-----who died
------///\-----of
-----///\\\----cancer
- toastedsock
- Casual Member
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Redsea
Re: which one is better
If you really wanna go dual axe, then I would suggest cleric as a sub. Warrior clerics are always good. I still wouldn't suggest DA but it's up to you.

Thanks to Hershey for the freakin awesome sig!!!!

Re: which one is better
they are decent until lvl 70 i think.
Then 1hand sword gets a new skill that rivals dual axe damage.
2hands damage is superior the whole way.
Dual axe bard looks sexy though lol, but cleric sub is always better for warriors unless its a 1handed warrior then you're better off with warlock sub.
Then 1hand sword gets a new skill that rivals dual axe damage.
2hands damage is superior the whole way.
Dual axe bard looks sexy though lol, but cleric sub is always better for warriors unless its a 1handed warrior then you're better off with warlock sub.

- eaglehawk
- Regular Member
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2006 5:05 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Babel
Re: which one is better
each weapon has their benefits but take for instance
if you have ran out of bless spell or iron skin, dual axe is better against rogues than using 2h sword, having no def buffs can land you in hot water, he can possibly one hit/2 hit you as your trying a daredevil, but with dual axe the dagger rogue wont do as much dmg and u can stun and bleed him combo him before he pricks and he is dead as he cant pot quick enough. but ive also noticed its almost impossible to kill a decent lvl 80 chinese with dual axe.
if you have ran out of bless spell or iron skin, dual axe is better against rogues than using 2h sword, having no def buffs can land you in hot water, he can possibly one hit/2 hit you as your trying a daredevil, but with dual axe the dagger rogue wont do as much dmg and u can stun and bleed him combo him before he pricks and he is dead as he cant pot quick enough. but ive also noticed its almost impossible to kill a decent lvl 80 chinese with dual axe.
-
Bounzzer
- Active Member
- Posts: 514
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 3:37 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: pacific
Re: which one is better
eaglehawk wrote:each weapon has their benefits but take for instance
if you have ran out of bless spell or iron skin, dual axe is better against rogues than using 2h sword, having no def buffs can land you in hot water, he can possibly one hit/2 hit you as your trying a daredevil, but with dual axe the dagger rogue wont do as much dmg and u can stun and bleed him combo him before he pricks and he is dead as he cant pot quick enough. but ive also noticed its almost impossible to kill a decent lvl 80 chinese with dual axe.
I think the strongest warrior still is the 2 handed, but I saw some duel axers pwn lvl 80 european pretty fast.
<<banned from SRF for rules violations. -SG>>