I'm a level 31 FF rogue/cleric atm. I've been looking at some rogue/warlock pvp videos lately, and they seem to be extremely strong. So I'm arguing against myself about whether to go rogue/cleric or rouge/warlock. de-leveling my cleric build wouldn't be to hard, so it isn't much trouble.
Any advice?
Thanks,
TsterT
Rouge/cleric vs. Rogue/warlock
Re: Rouge/cleric vs. Rogue/warlock
on what version of sro do you play? if on isro, i recommend staying cleric 
Re: Rouge/cleric vs. Rogue/warlock
put simply?
rogue/cleric good all rounder..
rogue/lock awesome pvp and okay pve
rogue/cleric good all rounder..
rogue/lock awesome pvp and okay pve
- Ningyotsukai-san
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1515
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:42 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Wherever my mind makes it to be
Re: Rouge/cleric vs. Rogue/warlock
Eh ...
The Cleric subbed one'll have a higher physical / magical defense (w/ cleric rod out), recovery division / healing cycle (orbit) for healing, and good absolute damage skills
Warlock subbed one'll be more suited for PvP (Unless you Lure / Str Lock in 8/8's). Not as immune as the cleric sub and more dependent on the use of grains. Probably has the most ease at dealing with builds that don't use the cleric mastery
I have both a rogue / cleric & rogue / warlock and can say ...I like the cleric one for group pvp (especially if most of my team are idiots (ctf / ba)) and like my warlock one for 1vs1, PvE, and in some instances, group pvp, if, and only if, there are some players that know what they're doing
The Cleric subbed one'll have a higher physical / magical defense (w/ cleric rod out), recovery division / healing cycle (orbit) for healing, and good absolute damage skills
Warlock subbed one'll be more suited for PvP (Unless you Lure / Str Lock in 8/8's). Not as immune as the cleric sub and more dependent on the use of grains. Probably has the most ease at dealing with builds that don't use the cleric mastery
I have both a rogue / cleric & rogue / warlock and can say ...I like the cleric one for group pvp (especially if most of my team are idiots (ctf / ba)) and like my warlock one for 1vs1, PvE, and in some instances, group pvp, if, and only if, there are some players that know what they're doing

"To gain that which is worth having, it may be necessary to lose everything else."
Re: Rouge/cleric vs. Rogue/warlock
I never really thought about the group pvp part. The main reason why I am making a rouge is for pvp, and as you said, rogue/cleric is better for group pvp, and rogue/warlock is better for 1v1 pvp. I came to a conclusion of rogue/cleric, but where I get second thoughts, is where I remember I like support classes quite a bit. When I was watching pvp videos of the two builds, I noticed, the warlock isn't really necessary in 1v1 pvp, and the majority of the damage comes from the daggers. So I decided to go with rogue/cleric.
Thanks for the help guys,
TsterT
Thanks for the help guys,
TsterT

- Ningyotsukai-san
- Loyal Member
- Posts: 1515
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:42 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Wherever my mind makes it to be
Re: Rouge/cleric vs. Rogue/warlock
TsterT wrote:I never really thought about the group pvp part. The main reason why I am making a rouge is for pvp, and as you said, rogue/cleric is better for group pvp, and rogue/warlock is better for 1v1 pvp. I came to a conclusion of rogue/cleric, but where I get second thoughts, is where I remember I like support classes quite a bit. When I was watching pvp videos of the two builds, I noticed, the warlock isn't really necessary in 1v1 pvp, and the majority of the damage comes from the daggers. So I decided to go with rogue/cleric.
Thanks for the help guys,
TsterT
Yea, the warlock sub is nice for the "interruptions" (stun & sleep), since Rogues already don't require the debuffs to kill, they just make it faster ...lol

"To gain that which is worth having, it may be necessary to lose everything else."
Re: Rouge/cleric vs. Rogue/warlock
Offence is the best form of Defence