Could someone please explain why my friend a bow/fire char does almost twice as much damage as myself glaive/fire were only lv 11 but still..
And i mean for the little more you last as glaive/fire it's not worth it, seems to me.
He would so kill me if we were to fight eachother, i think can someone lighten this up for me?
Also he does more damage and his mana doesn't run out as fast as mine and he is also full str..
I'm seriously doubting to take a bow/fire like him. (i want a good char for pvp/hunter)
Thanks in advance.
Glaive/fire vs Bow/fire
seriously, it's hard to test a build at level 11. your char just isn't built up enough to tell. equipment has a HUGE impact also, so if he's better equipped, that'll do it, especially if he's got any +str equip. since the str is so low at that level, any added would be a huge advantage.
go get to level 20 or so and then test it out. comparably equipped, i'd say you should be able to take him, assuming you know how to pvp.
oh, and try to get close to him as soon as possible. the biggest advantage for bows is that they can knock your life down before you get to them.
go get to level 20 or so and then test it out. comparably equipped, i'd say you should be able to take him, assuming you know how to pvp.
oh, and try to get close to him as soon as possible. the biggest advantage for bows is that they can knock your life down before you get to them.
Nope, no pots or better equipment..
I'm all the way in str, so is he.
(And on our server Troy, almost everyone i see is a warrior, sometimes i see a archer.. why is that i mean, archers sure aren't worse then warriors from what ive seen)
Btw, how mutch mana is my char going to have at lv 50 with no points spend in int?
I'm all the way in str, so is he.
(And on our server Troy, almost everyone i see is a warrior, sometimes i see a archer.. why is that i mean, archers sure aren't worse then warriors from what ive seen)
Btw, how mutch mana is my char going to have at lv 50 with no points spend in int?