Warrior/Warlock vs. Warlock/Cleric

[Devilman]

Which one does better in pvp and which one would solo train better if no parties are available? Either 1h sword/warlock full str or warlock/cleric pure int. I read both of FugDup's guides and they both seem cool builds Thnx for your answers.

[raphaell666]

Which one does better in pvp
I say warlock/cleric in most situations. Warrior/warlock is excellent at it too. Both are excellent at group pvping, so well, both are good at both, lol.

and which one would solo train better if no parties are available?
Warlock/cleric.

Either 1h sword/warlock full str or warlock/cleric pure int. I read both of FugDup's guides and they both seem cool builds Thnx for your answers.
It's all up to you. Both are simply excellent builds.

[-.-]

one with sub is easier to play and does a bit better in pvp if it fights warrior/warlock... not saying warlock one wouldn't win but it needs more than button pushing

soloing, warlock one would do a bit better i think, it can kill giants faster from debuffs and debuff also makes it hit lower so you wouldn't need healiing as much and pots can do rest

[The Furious Ninja]

for pvp both are good, but warrior is more fun to me at pvp

but solo the int warlock wins hands down

[noobert mclagg]

Warlock/cleric has holy word which makes the warriors debuffs useless, and 1h by itself cant kill for shit. And to add to it the warlock has recovery div, bless, and other healing skills, so imo the warlock would win if it was pvping the warrior. For grinding hands down it would be the warlock, but for general pvp they both will not preform that well against euros because most of them hav a cleric sub which renders the debuffs useless.