s/s warrior vs 2h

[Artanis]

can you guys tells me the difference and which you prefer and why?

[Mousetrap]

1H warrior (or s/s warrior) is usually just for party play, as you can't do much damage on your own so you become the body of other party members, taking hits for them.

With 2H you have a large damage output but less defense.
Both are needed to be a true warrior.. but at the bare minimum get 2H. (unless you are warlock sub, that changes a lot; unless the opponent has holyword.. blah)
Get both.

[Grimm-.-]

Two handed warriors deal a much greater attack with less damage, in pvp you have to kill quickly or be killed without skins or cleric subclass, If you are using skins or cleric subclass it will be a very strong pvp class, It can tank very well while dealing great damage.
solo grinding is faster... Should take 1-2 skills to bring down a monster but you have to stick to 1-3 mobs or else you can easily get raped. party play is decent. The party play i am referring to is the party with a few wizards, a rouge, a cleric, a bard, and one warrior.
The rouges lure the mobs from a far distance with fast shot, as the mobs get closer the warrior uses howling shout of taunting target. This will lure the mobs on to him, If you are a 2 hander you need to be very careful when doing this... Make sure your wizards are efficient at killing or you will die easy.

One handed warriors deal much less damage with more defense, in pvp it is more difficult to kill Chinese without a warlock subclass, so dont even think about cleric subclass because the only thing you are going to be able to do is tank and deal somewhat good damage, if you are against s.s Chinese... good luck. Solo grinding is very slow as the s.s warrior deal lower damage but you can tank more mobs at once. Party play... Pretty much what i said for 2 handed warriors except the once handed warriors wont die as easy and can probably lure more mobs if the wiz'z are slow killers..

~Summery.

Two Handed Warrior.
~ Much higher damage output
~ Does not have to much of a problem killing anything in pvp.
~ Less defense, But still has tanking ability of course
~ Cleric subclass will benefit more
~ Decent for party play but cannot act as the lurer as well as the s.s

One Handed Warrior.
~ Less Damage output.
~ Difficulty killing Chinese in pvp
~ High defense, Better ability to tank
~ Better for party play
~ Warlock subclass benefits much more then cleric.

[OTG]

2h | cleric

1h | Warlock

Or get 2h | 1h | cleric, if they pvp against each other at 90 FF +5 set and +5 wep, then 2h will win.

[Grimm-.-]

2h | cleric

1h | Warlock

Or get 2h | 1h | cleric, if they pvp against each other at 90 FF +5 set and +5 wep, then 2h will win.

If who pvps who the 2hander will win?
Can you restate that?

[aishsharma]

right now im making a dual axe warrior/warlok and i thnk its best fr both (only a noob at lvl 20 so cud b rong )

but i generally take aggro more than 1h or 2h my lvl AND in solo i kill almost as fast as a 2h.