Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class

Discuss building Silkroad characters and learning skill trees. Ask for advice and opinions, or help others.
Post Reply
User avatar
Coooolo70
Hi, I'm New Here
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:45 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: United Kingdom

Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class

Post by Coooolo70 »

This is what I'm doing right now.

I've read up good and bad points on this, but would like to see what new things people could add about having a rogue with warlock as a second.

Currently I'm level 11, and have all rogue/warlock stuff up as much as I can, and am going full str.

Please give me any tips you can ^^

User avatar
Rumai
Valued Member
Posts: 369
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 7:49 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: ;)

Re: Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class

Post by Rumai »

imo lock is only good for pvp. i should go cleric
<< banned for being a constant problem. -cin >>

User avatar
Shadowfox542
Active Member
Posts: 914
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:16 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Olympus

Re: Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class

Post by Shadowfox542 »

IMO, bad build.
Rouge:
Massive damage
Low defense

Warlock:
Deal more damage, no extra defense

Bard:
Faster, and noise helps for grinding with DD/CE on

Cleric:
A ton of defense for 45 seconds, and if you get the passives and the phy/mag buffs you have a lot more defense if your running away with a cleric rod in hand.

Also, the only problem a rouge should have is defense, and if the rouge can't deal enough damage to kill someone, then they are probably like 6 levels above you, and will resist most debuffs. At cap, a lot of debuffs will resist on enemies with holy spell, cept' for the lv10 ones, which division/decay are not.

User avatar
Stress
Ex-Staff
Posts: 4599
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:42 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Studying Computer Science, Vienna

Re: Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class

Post by Stress »

Shadowfox542 wrote:IMO, bad build.
Rouge:
Massive damage
Low defense

Warlock:
Deal more damage, no extra defense

Bard:
Faster, and noise helps for grinding with DD/CE on

Cleric:
A ton of defense for 45 seconds, and if you get the passives and the phy/mag buffs you have a lot more defense if your running away with a cleric rod in hand.

Also, the only problem a rouge should have is defense, and if the rouge can't deal enough damage to kill someone, then they are probably like 6 levels above you, and will resist most debuffs. At cap, a lot of debuffs will resist on enemies with holy spell, cept' for the lv10 ones, which division/decay are not.


Sleep / Stun -> Debuff -> sleep/stun again -> DD -> Prick.

'nuff said.
Carry your cross, and I'll carry mine.

User avatar
Shadowfox542
Active Member
Posts: 914
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:16 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Olympus

Re: Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class

Post by Shadowfox542 »

Stress wrote:
Shadowfox542 wrote:IMO, bad build.
Rouge:
Massive damage
Low defense

Warlock:
Deal more damage, no extra defense

Bard:
Faster, and noise helps for grinding with DD/CE on

Cleric:
A ton of defense for 45 seconds, and if you get the passives and the phy/mag buffs you have a lot more defense if your running away with a cleric rod in hand.

Also, the only problem a rouge should have is defense, and if the rouge can't deal enough damage to kill someone, then they are probably like 6 levels above you, and will resist most debuffs. At cap, a lot of debuffs will resist on enemies with holy spell, cept' for the lv10 ones, which division/decay are not.


Sleep / Stun -> Debuff -> sleep/stun again -> DD -> Prick.

'nuff said.


Bless->DD->Stealth->Prick.

I suppose they are both good builds, but I think cleric is a lot better for group pvp/jobbing, as bless applies to party, without being any worse in 1v1. Ress has saved my trader and fellow hunters a whole lot.

User avatar
Ash
Active Member
Posts: 585
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:47 pm
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Earth

Re: Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class

Post by Ash »

IMO i prefer speed over defense . i won't be buying horses any more . i won't spend 100k every time i go grind for speed scroll .

+ there are already plenty of clerics around like 80% of wizards has cleric as a sup & 80% of the warriors are the same .

though it's very rare to find a full bard .

-----------------------------------------

anyway warlock sub is a pure pvp build
+ it needs a lot of farming

------------------------------------

@ topic starter if you are not getting
pfarmed go pure rogue (only 1 weapon) with gap 0 till cap
Image

User avatar
Shadowfox542
Active Member
Posts: 914
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:16 am
Quick Reply: Yes
Location: Olympus

Re: Going for Rogue with Warlock sub class

Post by Shadowfox542 »

Ash wrote:IMO i prefer speed over defense . i won't be buying horses any more . i won't spend 100k every time i go grind for speed scroll .

+ there are already plenty of clerics around like 80% of wizards has cleric as a sup & 80% of the warriors are the same .

though it's very rare to find a full bard .

-----------------------------------------

anyway warlock sub is a pure pvp build
+ it needs a lot of farming

------------------------------------

@ topic starter if you are not getting
pfarmed go pure rogue (only 1 weapon) with gap 0 till cap


Yea, Bard is certainly helpful sub, but with xbow the range is enough that moving march isn't THAT useful, though noise helps when using CE.
Warlock/xbow/dags
Enjoy your farming, good in pvp/pve

Cleric/xbow/dags
Slightly less farming, slightly better in PvE, about the same in pvp (Imo)

Bard/Xbow/dags
Not a lot of farming, bard is useless in pvp, and excellent in pve.

bard/xbow
Little farming, levels quickly, not great in pvp

Post Reply

Return to “Characters and Skills”