1H Warrior/Bard

[Grim_Soul]

You guys think this would be OK? Seeing that the 1H Warrior can tank pretty well anyway, I think it may be decent. Im not looking to PvP much, though I will prolly Job with it as a Hunter,

I figure the speed boost from the Marches would come in handy (I know u can buy the speed pots but imo that gets pretty expensive over time). On top of that it would be quite a bit cheaper SP-wise then going with a Cleric or 'Lock sub.

[MrFudge]

its a good build to have in parties but only for the buffs.
the damage is terrible. In jobbing u wont be able to kill anyone, and it'll take you 3 or so hits just to kill a single monster.

[Domination]

its a good build to have in parties but only for the buffs.
the damage is terrible. In jobbing u wont be able to kill anyone, and it'll take you 3 or so hits just to kill a single monster.

no, 1H can in fact fight. They might do less damage but if used correctly, they can kill.

@Grim_Soul
I honestly think that bard is useless for a warrior. Before other classes got bard for 2 reasons: MM and Noise. A warrior will only get the benifit of having MM. (moving march)
As a warrior your job is to bring mobs to you, not make them run away. If you are in a party, have the bard give you speed. If you just want to get around fast...horse *unless you are in a fight*

[Rozelady]

u always have friends who are bards they can give u the speed 2

[raysisfenix]

i think its ok to go 1H warriot/ bard. I would probably do the same thing too if i am creating a new character. i hate walking slow and buying those expensive speed drugs.