Who is stronger, rogue/warlock or warrior/warlock?

[Rush4Life]

Ive seen alot of pvp vids of warrior/warlocks pwning everybody, and Ive also seen rogue/warlocks pwn everybody, but when you compare both together, who will be the strongest, in attack, defence, etc.. etc..?

Rogues get CB, DD, stealth, very high chance of crits (very important) and a very high attack.
Warrior get iron skin, mana skin, a shield, vital increase, shield trash and some other nice skills.

They both have enough HP, so they are both strong enough. In the warrior pvp vids, I saw them de-buff, than switch to sword, and start hacking away with their sword, but it takes them some time to finish their opponent.
Rogue/warlocks just de-buff and while their opponent sleeps, DD and a strong dagger skill, and crits are fatal. So they use both a different form of attacking, one takes a little more time than the other one.

[SunDark]

Ive seen alot of pvp vids of warrior/warlocks pwning everybody, and Ive also seen rogue/warlocks pwn everybody, but when you compare both together, who will be the strongest, in attack, defence, etc.. etc..?

Rogues get CB, DD, stealth, very high chance of crits (very important) and a very high attack.
Warrior get iron skin, mana skin, a shield, vital increase, shield trash and some other nice skills.

They both have enough HP, so they are both strong enough. In the warrior pvp vids, I saw them de-buff, than switch to sword, and start hacking away with their sword, but it takes them some time to finish their opponent.
Rogue/warlocks just de-buff and while their opponent sleeps, DD and a strong dagger skill, and crits are fatal. So they use both a different form of attacking, one takes a little more time than the other one.

if any build PVP another any build...
it depends on who att first
but i see warrior/warlock is better

[KarmaPolice]

who stuns first wins

[noobert mclagg]

I like warrior/warlock better, rogue are to fragile even with a cleric sub.

[-.-]

warriors almost always kill rogues...
with their screens/skins, rogues wont hit much

[NobleHunter]

Simple, if warlocks stuns first the rogue is dead, if the rogue stuns first the warrior is dead.
Rogues have more attack alternatives than warriors, rogues can use stealth to finish their enemies with a few hits with daggers or from a long distance outside the warlock range. I wouldnt use against a warior/warlock warlock skills, rogue skills should be enough.

[-.-]

um... you cant just go stealth in middle of fight... it doesnt work that way

warriors have sprint assualt too

[NobleHunter]

um... you cant just go stealth in middle of fight... it doesnt work that way

warriors have sprint assualt too

Duh, i know you cant, you dont need to appear in front of your enemy before going stealth....

[weymouthhall]

um... you cant just go stealth in middle of fight... it doesnt work that way

warriors have sprint assualt too

Duh, i know you cant, you dont need to appear in front of your enemy before going stealth....

They both fair out, depend on who get the first stun and first slumber on opponent.
I saw a couple of these pvp videos featuring warlock/ rogue and warrior/ warlock. I agreed they are strong in pvp, but the aspect that holy spell alone from cleric cures most of their curses except stun, slumber , and maybe a couple weaken curses( which will be cured at 90 cap when u can add blues that reduce status and weaken curses onto your acccessories), it just dont appeal to me that much

[ahmedsabry]

actually warrior / warlock is better for a reason.. warriors have massive defence, thier only downside is the low attack of the 1H. so since warlock fixes this, then the build is perfect. on the other hand, rogue already does massive damage.. with warlock on, damage increases even more, but it doesnt solve the fragility problem rogues suffer from.. its all about using a sub that covers ur weak points