Warrior or Rogue?

[NoWhere2hide]

Hey i'm making a nub...it is almost done farming at ongs with 500k+ sp...the things is i really dunno whether to go warrior or rogue, i'll prob have cleric no matter which on i choose, but really stuck with one to choose, so wonder if srf can help me

Srrry if this is wrong section

Thnx

[ShiningBow]

rogue ftw =) rogue with warlock subs just owns too =)

[Nitro]

I say go Warrior .... Much better build ...

[Weirdo]

Rogue FTW

seriously...

[ShiningBow]

Rogue FTW

seriously...

QFT

[iGod]

Warrior + Rogue would be best, warlock is useless at 80

[Chess]

Warlock is useless at 80 ??? um where's that idea come from. Do you want to tank or sneak up on people and have ranged attack

[iGod]

My bad, useless AT 76.

[StuckUP]

My bad, useless AT 76.

Lies. Warlock/Cleric at any lvl owns all.

[SuperTanker]

My bad, useless AT 76.

why will it suck at 76?
to the topic creator: what do you like, being a faster lvler or being able to pwn in pvp? BTW rogues are good in pvp too .

i say go rogue.

[/Pi]

Be the heart of a party. Be a warrior.

[Sylhana]

Be the heart of a party. Be a warrior.

Be the eyes of the party, overseer and scout. Be a ninja.

Edit: I mean uh rogue.

[Anubis Ghost]

both are good but it depends on your playing style
the good side that rogue has is that they can go either melee or long range

Rogue - 1hit or be 1 hitted, rogue in right hands is very deadly, rogue not very needed in euro parties, yes they do good dmg but they only attack single target.
Warrior - head to head fighter,always needed in pt with wizards(at good spot its crazy exp)does good dmg but sometimes it will take you few hits before you kill the target unlike rogue

IMO go rogue, criting like crazy from far is fun, back stabbing can be also fun :]

[jarrod]

there's way too many rogues around....get warrior...

[ShadowReaver]

A straight objective answer is impossible to give.
There isnt a better or worse build, it really depends on your style of play.
if you like to sneak upon ur enemies and deal really high dmg, but suffer from weak defence, no ability to tank without a cleric with you, and on 1v1 your win/lose will more likely depend if you attacked first or not, choose a rouge.
if you wanna be able to tank pretty good, get some neat skills for extra defence, but deal less dmg(more suitable for 1v1 combat).
most people forget this game is BALANCED. if you like your build, you'll probably be good at it. if you choose a build just because it's popular, but dont enjoy it, you'll probably suck on this build, because u dont really "feel" the char, if i can put it that way. i chose a wizard because i like killing fast, and on every game i played always a wizard or a mage just because i liked it, and i was good with all the chars.
so what you need is to think really good what suits YOU better.
good luck.
/end rant

[PiiNoY]

Rouge/bard. I would love that build at 80.

[Grimm-.-]

YEAH!Q

I dunno...I have a warrior currently so i would go for rouge...Cus they are actually pretty damn fun if you have the full tree. They got awesome skillz too GL with your choice...Imo they are both great. Only big differance is in pvp...Rouge kill quick or get killed quick. warrior. have a mildly long fun battle with a glavie usually destrying him with a crit

Ehh...yeah didnt feel like getting involved with the specifics so work with that. hehe:D

[X4rd4S]

Its simple if you want to hunt unique choose rogue, who kills yarkan on new servers, and who will be first to kill shaytan? Rogue xbow offcourse.
But if you want to tank evrything and have nice pvp build choose warrios 2handed.

[the_wicked]

My bad, useless AT 76.

why will it suck at 76?
to the topic creator: what do you like, being a faster lvler or being able to pwn in pvp? BTW rogues are good in pvp too .

i say go rogue.

Holy spell ; 8 lvl status prevention (100%)
Anyway, my fave euro build is warrior cleric. Get at least 1H and 2H sword, 1H is a better tank.

[ShadowReaver]

Its simple if you want to hunt unique choose rogue, who kills yarkan on new servers, and who will be first to kill shaytan? Rogue xbow offcourse.
But if you want to tank evrything and have nice pvp build choose warrios 2handed.

Dunno about the rouges u know, but wizards takes the kill usually.

[X4rd4S]

Its simple if you want to hunt unique choose rogue, who kills yarkan on new servers, and who will be first to kill shaytan? Rogue xbow offcourse.
But if you want to tank evrything and have nice pvp build choose warrios 2handed.

Dunno about the rouges u know, but wizards takes the kill usually.

they die, with rogue you dont die. I dont know many wizards that kll yarkan.

[William-CL]

Warrior + Rogue would be best, warlock is useless at 80

Im making a rogue/warrior But warlock isn't useless.

[Dian Jie]

forget the cleric and take both?

[Deacon]

Ray... 2Handed for the win, rogue is Farking boring xD

[XMoshe]

Warlock is useless at 80 ??? um where's that idea come from. Do you want to tank or sneak up on people and have ranged attack

Clerics get holy spell at lvl 76 which makes the whole pt they are in immune to maxed (lvl 8 ) warlock debuffs...So the debuffs wont work anymore.

But thats just because people cant pvp anymore without help from a cleric. Warlock pwns in a one on one without a cleric helping (except if the guy you are fighting has the cleric class hehe)

About your dilemma...It's what you want. Strong attacks and a bit tanking ability, go warrior..Want very strong attack but you will have to sneak up on people (mostly) to do it, go rogue.

Your choice Not ours

[NoWhere2hide]

Thnx all for your advice, well

Ray... 2Handed for the win, rogue is Farking boring xD

i could of guessed what you would say

Anyways to everyone else, i originally wanted to go warrior but since speaking to a few people, i found ou they may be boring with very few atacks...and Rogues..well they looks cool for one and do insane high crit, and i guess taking cleric would make me more useful in pt.

btw i plan to plvl most of the way to lvl 72 ish...then lvl from there on...i will prob not be pvping either with it until 64+!!!

Thnx

[XMoshe]

Thnx all for your advice, well

Ray... 2Handed for the win, rogue is Farking boring xD

i could of guessed what you would say

Anyways to everyone else, i originally wanted to go warrior but since speaking to a few people, i found ou they may be boring with very few atacks...and Rogues..well they looks cool for one and do insane high crit, and i guess taking cleric would make me more useful in pt.

btw i plan to plvl most of the way to lvl 72 ish...then lvl from there on...i will prob not be pvping either with it until 64+!!!

Thnx

Warrior has as much attacks as rogue so the number of attacks wont matter Its just how you like the attacks.

Also, if you plvl to 72, you can get a good weapon there and pt general to 80 being cleric.

I would prefer warrior over rogue because of the buffs they could give to others =] But I just like to help others so meh

[brentonsbbe359]

do cleric/bard

it owns


rouge is cooler then warrior.

[inky]

Depends which one you think you'll enjoy more. I'm going for Rogue-Cleric since I've always been a fan of daggers and crossbows ever since I started playing MMORPGs

If you're making a character solely for dominating in 1-on-1 pvp or ksing, I would suggest creating a rogue.

[the_wicked]

Depends which one you think you'll enjoy more. I'm going for Rogue-Cleric since I've always been a fan of daggers and crossbows ever since I started playing MMORPGs

If you're making a character solely for dominating in 1-on-1 pvp or ksing, I would suggest creating a rogue.

You mean a build for stealth + one shot pvp.

Warriors are more fun to pvp with (with cleric subclass). If you have holy spell you can block all freeze and other effects (excluding bleed) It will be more of a 1v1 pvp that chinese are used to, not stealth +prick pvp.