Page 1 of 1

can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build

Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 9:47 pm
by hscorp
can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build?

Re: can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build

Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 9:57 pm
by -.-
bard

Re: can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build

Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 10:21 pm
by Chess
If by Wizard you mean as a secondary and jester as main then yes

Re: can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build

Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 1:36 am
by Barotix
Pure Strength with Wizard main is not good; you should not be Pure Strength with Wizard as your main class, sry.

Re: can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build

Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 6:40 pm
by BankaiPwn
DO NOT go pure str wizard. That is actually absolutely useless, because all of your skills rely on int for damage. That's like making a pure int blader without any nukes... xD

Edit: as for second build, either bard or cleric (and if you want to sp farm a lot, warlock). Bard is for speed (moving march / swing march at level 80), Cleric is for recovery divison, bless spell, etc. In the end it's up to you

Bankai

Re: can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build

Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 7:32 am
by Skayunor
Yeah full Strength wizard is bad, it's ridiculous, nearly as stupid as making a full int warrior.. :roll:

Re: can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build

Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 6:20 pm
by Barotix
Skayunor wrote:Yeah full Strength wizard is bad, it's ridiculous, nearly as stupid as making a full int warrior.. :roll:


Only if warrior is your main class. If he went (str class) sub wizard, then its good. If he just want to be pure str wizard.... You get it :)