Page 1 of 1
can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 9:47 pm
by hscorp
can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build?
Re: can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 9:57 pm
by -.-
bard
Re: can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build
Posted: Sat May 24, 2008 10:21 pm
by Chess
If by Wizard you mean as a secondary and jester as main then yes
Re: can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build
Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 1:36 am
by Barotix
Pure Strength with Wizard main is not good; you should not be Pure Strength with Wizard as your main class, sry.
Re: can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build
Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 6:40 pm
by BankaiPwn
DO NOT go pure str wizard. That is actually absolutely useless, because all of your skills rely on int for damage. That's like making a pure int blader without any nukes... xD
Edit: as for second build, either bard or cleric (and if you want to sp farm a lot, warlock). Bard is for speed (moving march / swing march at level 80), Cleric is for recovery divison, bless spell, etc. In the end it's up to you
Bankai
Re: can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 7:32 am
by Skayunor
Yeah full Strength wizard is bad, it's ridiculous, nearly as stupid as making a full int warrior..

Re: can i be wizard with pure str? and what's be second build
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 6:20 pm
by Barotix
Skayunor wrote:Yeah full Strength wizard is bad, it's ridiculous, nearly as stupid as making a full int warrior..

Only if warrior is your main class. If he went (str class) sub wizard, then its good. If he just want to be pure str wizard.... You get it
