Page 1 of 1

Almost impossible for wizards to level? ><

Posted: Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:46 pm
by Dean91
Hmm so yeh... theres hardly any mag mobs to lvl on...i mean you got the nachals... but i always die trying to get through the cave.. so forget that...
karra...are way to low now....im at bone soldiers...but 2 crits im gone...
anyone got any ideas -_-
cus im about to quit this god damn char :@

Re: Almost impossible for wizards to level? ><

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:03 am
by Tasdik
Use invis while running through the caves?

Join a party?

Re: Almost impossible for wizards to level? ><

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:08 am
by penfold1992
black eagles? nachals are the best mobs in the game so uh... wizzies can clear the whole back rooms at 69... your 7x just get +3 gear and a awesome staff! (no1 i knew used bless unless for partys)

Re: Almost impossible for wizards to level? ><

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 3:37 am
by Fauntleroy
Tasdik wrote:Use invis while running through the caves?

use this

Re: Almost impossible for wizards to level? ><

Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:21 pm
by Puma60
Pimp your set with Str/HP. Also maybe buy a Devil Suit if you dont already have one, for the 15% HP increase.

Re: Almost impossible for wizards to level? ><

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:27 am
by Dean91
hmm invis works sometimes i usually get lost in the cave forget to use invis and get raped ><
mehh im going back to bard...that way ive got noise ;)

Re: Almost impossible for wizards to level? ><

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:51 pm
by Taelys
The best defense of a wizzard is his attack, don't go in spots with mobs that require more than 2 hits to kill. Try eventually snipers, they are not aggro, don't spawn giants, don't spawn champs, and are easy to kill. And try the black eagles on roc, their attack is more magical and with robes you can take their damage pretty well. As in between I just see the nachals, you can make it there with invisible. They hit with strong magic (store lots of pills for the zombie) but their attack is slow. The roc mobs are more suited for a wizzard than the takla mobs excepted the niya mages and shamans.

Re: Almost impossible for wizards to level? ><

Posted: Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:56 pm
by Dean91
Taelys wrote:The best defense of a wizzard is his attack, don't go in spots with mobs that require more than 2 hits to kill. Try eventually snipers, they are not aggro, don't spawn giants, don't spawn champs, and are easy to kill. And try the black eagles on roc, their attack is more magical and with robes you can take their damage pretty well. As in between I just see the nachals, you can make it there with invisible. They hit with strong magic (store lots of pills for the zombie) but their attack is slow. The roc mobs are more suited for a wizzard than the takla mobs excepted the niya mages and shamans.


Yeah i can 1 hit snipers...but the only problem is all the party mobs... its just constantly them..so theres no point...
i went to black eagles earlier.. but ended up lagging....got raped by ante's
tried again....got raped by 2 giant ante's...so i give up
im going to nachals asoon as ive farmed 500 more hearts :)
going back to bard for noise + march... hate not having them so much

Re: Almost impossible for wizards to level? ><

Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:42 pm
by marijnz0r
wiz/bard is pussy build imho.
hit - run - hit - run.
pvp -> stink.

wiz/cleric is bigtime gangsta imho.
hit - walk (full hp during walk) - hit - walk (full hp again)
wiz/cleric can even tank giants when their level is lower.
go with LA and Bless Spell and you are a 1337-pwner.

this all imho :)

Re: Almost impossible for wizards to level? ><

Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:21 pm
by Dean91
marijnz0r wrote:wiz/bard is pussy build imho.
hit - run - hit - run.
pvp -> stink.

wiz/cleric is bigtime gangsta imho.
hit - walk (full hp during walk) - hit - walk (full hp again)
wiz/cleric can even tank giants when their level is lower.
go with LA and Bless Spell and you are a 1337-pwner.

this all imho :)


uve give me info which ive read on almost every wizard topic... not a reply