Hi,
Union mate told me is was good idea that my STR bower plvl and farm...then laughed. Told me I was wasting my time and I should lvl asap 0 gap and only farm at 90+ or Job Cave!
I'm a lvl 19 with 60k SP and my build is around 2,1M for 110FF.
I was wondering if it was really a good idea to level ASAP with no gap or if I should always keep a small gap. My original idea was to get 100k SP and then level with a 3 gap all the way up... until I find a good weapon to start farming again (around 6D-9D)
So, for a STR bower, which would you recommend? Job Cave ASAP or Farm all the way with a small gap
(BTW : My plvl at lvl 19 is free)
0 Gap All the way?
Re: 0 Gap All the way?
0 gap all the way = just grinding only. You can't pvp or job since you will suck horribly. There is 0 chance you will make it since it will the most boringest shit ever. Instead of a fun game, it will just be a grindfest.
.curve wrote:Unless Silkroad has a hole I can stick it in, I prefer spending money on the girlfriend.


Spoiler!
- firefinal1
- Active Member
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:38 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: The Netherland
Re: 0 Gap All the way?
if you got a free ong pt for a long time. Try to get about 400-500k sp on them.
Than just go 0gap till 91 92.
BUT you have to make sure you will get into a pt.
This way you can farm about 1000sp a hour (or more) without tickets.
And off course you got a decent chance of getting good gold + novas.
Imo this is the new way to go. ^^
Than just go 0gap till 91 92.
BUT you have to make sure you will get into a pt.
This way you can farm about 1000sp a hour (or more) without tickets.
And off course you got a decent chance of getting good gold + novas.
Imo this is the new way to go. ^^
Re: 0 Gap All the way?
0 gap all the way = just grinding only. You can't pvp or job since you will suck horribly. There is 0 chance you will make it since it will the most boringest shit ever. Instead of a fun game, it will just be a grindfest.
why should you start pvp or job below lvl 90? you would be too weak I think
To say since, the being is not or the non-being is, is wrong to say against it, the being is and the non-being is not, is right.



