which build is better ?

[ZaKnighT]

in my opnion blader fire cold wont die... with a +9 or +8 will pwnz please help me decide TY

[Snazzi]

Yeah, blader with ice, and a good set is the ultimate tank. I would go blader, if you don't have a problem with lvling real slow, otherwise go s/s nuker. Shame they need so many sp though.

[ZaKnighT]

3mil sp xD

[S3by]

If u want blader go bicheon / fire / cold .
If u want nuker go bicheon / light / cold .

[ZaKnighT]

light cold ??

[S3by]

Light for nuker is like CO2 from wather .

[ZaKnighT]

Light for nuker is like CO2 from wather .

but fire gives them more attack damge or im wrong ?

[Fox Mulder]

Cold/Fire blader might be a "Die Hard" build, but it would also be very hard to kill anyone. That can get kind of annoying after some time... And I don't think a +8 or +9 weapon would make a big difference.

To me, Bicheon/Cold/Lightning nuker seems like a nice build. Although I've never played a nuker, I think S3by has a point. The Fire imbue may have a greater mag. atk. pwr. than the Lightning, but I believe that's overcompensated by the mag. dmg. increase buff you can have with Lightning. There are also a bunch of other nice skills under the Lightning tree, like Lion Shout, speed buff, passive and active parry increase buffs... Besides, the skills under the Fire tree are more usefull for a Str. oriented builds and there's nothing particularly interesting there for a nuker.

[ZaKnighT]

we had a blader at my server fire/cold used to be a whole pt vs him he had +5/+6 set +9 weapon /sheild (he had a clric with him ^^ )

[BuDo]

none

[S3by]

Light for nuker is like CO2 from wather .

but fire gives them more attack damge or im wrong ?

fire gives more atk , but from fire u take only 2 nukes , and magical def buff , but from light u take all .

[Ownage]

If you want a special build that def. won't die unless the people's lvl are way higher then yours or its like 10vs1, then go 100hueskal/cold/bicheon ;D lvlings the only hard part.