Bard vs s/s nuker
- Sir_Nicolas
- Common Member
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:45 pm
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Apollo
Bard vs s/s nuker
whats best for soloing pve, and faster to lvl for a legit (no bot), a Bard. bard as a mian class or a s/s nuker..... tell me
<<Banned For Rules Violation>> - Key-J
not really... muahahahaha
not really... muahahahaha
- phulshof
- Frequent Member
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:36 am
- Quick Reply: Yes
- Location: Troy
- Contact:
Re: Bard vs s/s nuker
Having played both: s/s nuker, hands down. The damage they deal per second is about equal, but the splash, shield and pot delay of the s/s nuker make him more effective in grinding. Btw, I presume you consider taking cleric as a sub, or you'll have a serious HP replenishing issue for your bard.
Having said that though: bard/cleric is fun to play, very welcome at parties, and hardly uses any pots. I can grind several hours on 1 stack of them, just by using mana cycle and recovery division. I also don't have to worry about getting mobbed, since noise makes sure I'm always facing 1 enemy at a time (except when champions/giants are about).
Having said that though: bard/cleric is fun to play, very welcome at parties, and hardly uses any pots. I can grind several hours on 1 stack of them, just by using mana cycle and recovery division. I also don't have to worry about getting mobbed, since noise makes sure I'm always facing 1 enemy at a time (except when champions/giants are about).
[88] Vivace
Pure INT Bard/Cleric, Bard 88, Cleric 88
[83] Pinokkio
Pure INT Force Nuker, Force 83, Cold 83, Lightning 83, Fire 60
[81] Sybian
Pure INT KD Nuker, Bicheon 81, Cold 81, Lightning 81, Fire 60
Pure INT Bard/Cleric, Bard 88, Cleric 88
[83] Pinokkio
Pure INT Force Nuker, Force 83, Cold 83, Lightning 83, Fire 60
[81] Sybian
Pure INT KD Nuker, Bicheon 81, Cold 81, Lightning 81, Fire 60