Page 1 of 1
So for 100 cap
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:13 am
by Refurbished
for bower.. people want to go 100 pechon 100 light ? wth? i dont understand that./
Re: So for 100 cap
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:15 am
by loveisintheair
Here is what I don't understand:
Why are you making another thread?
Re: So for 100 cap
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:17 am
by Aisu
Bow is a more hybrid weapon then anything else.If pure str you already complete the physical dmg part. Light adds more mag dmg from buffs.
Edit:
Personally I wouldn't go 100 bow/light.
Re: So for 100 cap
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:20 am
by fckerr
Light pretty useless for bow, u dont have extra hp like glaviers or bonus def like bladers so u need def, 100pach100fire100cold...
Re: So for 100 cap
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:20 am
by kthnxbai
GTFO!
Re: So for 100 cap
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:25 am
by NO_SILK_4_ME
kthnxbai wrote:
GTFO!
+1
MENNS, FACK YARR NABB...
Seriously though, just look at kSRO if you really wanna know...youtube them, get an account, wahtever...don't start so many topics
Re: So for 100 cap
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 5:28 am
by .AWAKE.
loveisintheair wrote:Here is what I don't understand:
Why are you making another thread?
FOR REAL~!
Re: So for 100 cap
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:07 am
by hits98
loveisintheair wrote:Here is what I don't understand:
Why are you making another thread?
his counting POST.. what kind of noob is he..
OT: 100bow/100cold/68fire/32 light
why i pick light?
---->SPEED(only if there's no BARD)
---->the teleport(I dont know what it called XD)
Re: So for 100 cap
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:29 am
by Tig3ress
You and that other idiot 2k9bom get the same response

Re: So for 100 cap
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:48 am
by Swindler
So you should have anything to ask about.
Re: So for 100 cap
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 9:12 am
by Hellraider
The reason why i stuck with 90 light and eventually 100 light is because of my moveability, the phantom walk and speed benefit a bow's range, grinding is awesome, group pvp is awesome, just 1v1 pvp a bit less against str's